BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment without dementia (CIND) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are prevalent in older adults; however, the association of CIND with outcomes after AMI is unknown. METHODS: We used a multicenter registry to study 772 patients ≥65 years with AMI, enrolled between April 2005 and December 2008, who underwent cognitive function assessment with the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-modified (TICS-m) 1 month after AMI. Patients were categorized by cognitive status to describe characteristics and in-hospital treatment, including quality of life and survival 1 year after AMI. RESULTS: Mean age was 73.2 ± 6.3 years; 58.5% were men, and 78.2% were white. Normal cognitive function (TICS-m >22) was present in 44.4%; mild CIND (TICS-m 19-22) in 29.8%; and moderate/severe CIND (TICS-m <19) in 25.8% of patients. Rates of hypertension (72.6%, 77.4%, and 81.9%), cerebrovascular accidents (3.5%, 7.0%, and 9.0%), and myocardial infarction (20.1%, 22.2%, and 29.6%) were higher in those with lower TICS-m scores (P < .05 for comparisons). AMI medications were similar by cognitive status; however, CIND was associated with lower cardiac catheterization rates (P = .002) and cardiac rehabilitation referrals (P < .001). Patients with moderate/severe CIND had higher risk-adjusted 1-year mortality that was nonstatistically significant (adjusted hazard ratio 1.97, 95% CI 0.99-3.94, P = .054; referent normal, TICS-m >22). Quality of life across cognitive status was similar at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Most older patients surviving AMI have measurable CIND. Cognitive impairment without dementia was associated with less invasive care, less referral and participation in cardiac rehabilitation, and worse risk-adjusted 1-year survival in those with moderate/severe CIND, making it an important condition to consider in optimizing AMI care.
BACKGROUND:Cognitive impairment without dementia (CIND) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are prevalent in older adults; however, the association of CIND with outcomes after AMI is unknown. METHODS: We used a multicenter registry to study 772 patients ≥65 years with AMI, enrolled between April 2005 and December 2008, who underwent cognitive function assessment with the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-modified (TICS-m) 1 month after AMI. Patients were categorized by cognitive status to describe characteristics and in-hospital treatment, including quality of life and survival 1 year after AMI. RESULTS: Mean age was 73.2 ± 6.3 years; 58.5% were men, and 78.2% were white. Normal cognitive function (TICS-m >22) was present in 44.4%; mild CIND (TICS-m 19-22) in 29.8%; and moderate/severe CIND (TICS-m <19) in 25.8% of patients. Rates of hypertension (72.6%, 77.4%, and 81.9%), cerebrovascular accidents (3.5%, 7.0%, and 9.0%), and myocardial infarction (20.1%, 22.2%, and 29.6%) were higher in those with lower TICS-m scores (P < .05 for comparisons). AMI medications were similar by cognitive status; however, CIND was associated with lower cardiac catheterization rates (P = .002) and cardiac rehabilitation referrals (P < .001). Patients with moderate/severe CIND had higher risk-adjusted 1-year mortality that was nonstatistically significant (adjusted hazard ratio 1.97, 95% CI 0.99-3.94, P = .054; referent normal, TICS-m >22). Quality of life across cognitive status was similar at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Most older patients surviving AMI have measurable CIND. Cognitive impairment without dementia was associated with less invasive care, less referral and participation in cardiac rehabilitation, and worse risk-adjusted 1-year survival in those with moderate/severe CIND, making it an important condition to consider in optimizing AMI care.
Authors: David A Dorr; Spencer S Jones; Laurie Burns; Steven M Donnelly; Cherie P Brunker; Adam Wilcox; Paul D Clayton Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: M H Tabert; S M Albert; L Borukhova-Milov; Y Camacho; G Pelton; X Liu; Y Stern; D P Devanand Journal: Neurology Date: 2002-03-12 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Rosebud O Roberts; David S Knopman; Yonas E Geda; Ruth H Cha; Véronique L Roger; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2008-12-16 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Laura D Baker; Laura L Frank; Karen Foster-Schubert; Pattie S Green; Charles W Wilkinson; Anne McTiernan; Stephen R Plymate; Mark A Fishel; G Stennis Watson; Brenna A Cholerton; Glen E Duncan; Pankaj D Mehta; Suzanne Craft Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2010-01
Authors: Mark Y Chan; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Lena J Sun; Karen S Pieper; Harvey D White; Philip E Aylward; James J Ferguson; Robert M Califf; Matthew T Roe Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Jose A Suaya; William B Stason; Philip A Ades; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Donald S Shepard Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-06-30 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Kevin C Floyd; Jorge Yarzebski; Frederick A Spencer; Darleen Lessard; James E Dalen; Joseph S Alpert; Joel M Gore; Robert J Goldberg Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2009-03-05
Authors: Suzanne V Arnold; David A Morrow; Yang Lei; David J Cohen; Elizabeth M Mahoney; Eugene Braunwald; Paul S Chan Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2009-06-02
Authors: Molly E Waring; David D McManus; Stephenie C Lemon; Joel M Gore; Milena D Anatchkova; Richard H McManus; Arlene S Ash; Robert J Goldberg; Catarina I Kiefe; Jane S Saczynski Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2015-10-23
Authors: John A Dodson; Alexandra M Hajduk; Mary Geda; Harlan M Krumholz; Terrence E Murphy; Sui Tsang; Mary E Tinetti; Michael G Nanna; Richard McNamara; Thomas M Gill; Sarwat I Chaudhry Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2019-12-10 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Jane S Saczynski; David D McManus; Molly E Waring; Darleen Lessard; Milena D Anatchkova; Jerry H Gurwitz; Jeroan Allison; Arlene S Ash; Richard H McManus; David C Parish; Robert J Goldberg; Catarina I Kiefe Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2017-12
Authors: Deborah A Levine; Kenneth M Langa; Andrzej Galecki; Mohammed Kabeto; Lewis B Morgenstern; Darin B Zahuranec; Bruno Giordani; Lynda D Lisabeth; Brahmajee K Nallamothu Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-08-13 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Mary D Naylor; Karen B Hirschman; Alexandra L Hanlon; Katherine M Abbott; Kathryn H Bowles; Janice Foust; Shivani Shah; Cynthia Zubritsky Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2015-09-26 Impact factor: 4.669