OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the type and prevalence of incidental findings from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) of the maxillofacial region. Findings are divided into those that require (i) intervention/referral, (ii) monitoring, and (iii) no further evaluation. METHODS: Three hundred consecutive CBCT scans conducted in the University of North Carolina School of Dentistry Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Clinic from January 1 to August 31, 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. Findings were categorized into airway, soft tissue calcifications, bone, temporomandibular joint (TMJ), endodontic, dental developmental, and pathological findings. RESULTS: A total of 272 scans revealed 881 incidental findings (3.2 findings/scan). The most prevalent was airway findings (35%) followed by soft tissue calcifications (20%), bone (17.5%), TMJ (15.4%), endodontic (11.3%), dental developmental (0.7%), and pathological (0.1%). 16.1% required intervention/referral, 15.6% required monitoring, and the remainder (68.3%) required neither. CONCLUSION: This study underscores the need to thoroughly examine all CBCT volumes for clinically significant findings within and beyond the region of interest.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the type and prevalence of incidental findings from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) of the maxillofacial region. Findings are divided into those that require (i) intervention/referral, (ii) monitoring, and (iii) no further evaluation. METHODS: Three hundred consecutive CBCT scans conducted in the University of North Carolina School of Dentistry Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Clinic from January 1 to August 31, 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. Findings were categorized into airway, soft tissue calcifications, bone, temporomandibular joint (TMJ), endodontic, dental developmental, and pathological findings. RESULTS: A total of 272 scans revealed 881 incidental findings (3.2 findings/scan). The most prevalent was airway findings (35%) followed by soft tissue calcifications (20%), bone (17.5%), TMJ (15.4%), endodontic (11.3%), dental developmental (0.7%), and pathological (0.1%). 16.1% required intervention/referral, 15.6% required monitoring, and the remainder (68.3%) required neither. CONCLUSION: This study underscores the need to thoroughly examine all CBCT volumes for clinically significant findings within and beyond the region of interest.
Authors: J P Tchorz; P J Poxleitner; S Stampf; S B M Patzelt; D Rottke; E Hellwig; M J Altenburger Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2013-07-30 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Ivna A Lopes; Rosana M A Tucunduva; Roberta H Handem; Ana Lucia A Capelozza Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2016-10-05 Impact factor: 2.419