Literature DB >> 22092911

Comparative evaluation of different calcium phosphate-based bone graft granules - an in vitro study with osteoblast-like cells.

Anne Bernhardt1, Anja Lode, Fabian Peters, Michael Gelinsky.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Granule-shaped calcium phosphate-based bone graft materials are often required for bone regeneration especially in implant dentistry. Two newly developed bone graft materials are Ceracell(®) , an open-celled highly porous bioceramic from β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) under addition of bioglass and Osseolive(®) , an open porous glass ceramic with the general formula Ca2 KNa(PO4 )2 . The goal of this study was to characterize different modifications of the two bone graft materials in vitro in comparison to already established ceramic bone grafts Cerasorb M(®) , NanoBone(®) and BONIT Matrix(®) .
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adhesion and proliferation of SaOS-2 osteoblast-like cells were evaluated quantitatively by determining DNA content and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity and qualitatively by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In addition, MTT cell-vitality staining was applied to confirm the attachment of viable cells to the different materials. Osteogenic differentiation was evaluated by measurement of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity as well as gene expression analysis of osteogenic markers using reverse transcriptase PCR.
RESULTS: DNA content and LDH activity revealed good cell attachment and proliferation for Ceracell and Cerasorb M. When pre-incubated with cell-culture medium, also Osseolive showed good cell attachment and proliferation. Attachment and proliferation of osteoblast-like cells on NanoBone and BONIT Matrix was very low, even after pre-incubation with cell-culture medium. Specific ALP activity on Ceracell(®) , Osseolive (®) and Cerasorb M(®) increased with time and expression of bone-related genes ALP, osteonectin, osteopontin and bone sialoprotein II was demonstrated.
CONCLUSIONS: Ceracell as well as Osseolive granules support proliferation and osteogenic differentiation in vitro and may be promising candidates for in vivo applications.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22092911     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02350.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  9 in total

1.  Transportation conditions for prompt use of ex vivo expanded and freshly harvested clinical-grade bone marrow mesenchymal stromal/stem cells for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Elena Veronesi; Alba Murgia; Anna Caselli; Giulia Grisendi; Maria Serena Piccinno; Valeria Rasini; Rosaria Giordano; Tiziana Montemurro; Philippe Bourin; Luc Sensebé; Markus T Rojewski; Hubert Schrezenmeier; Pierre Layrolle; Maria Pau Ginebra; Carmen Bunu Panaitescu; Enrique Gómez-Barrena; Fabio Catani; Paolo Paolucci; Jorge S Burns; Massimo Dominici
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 3.056

2.  Nanocrystalline spherical hydroxyapatite granules for bone repair: in vitro evaluation with osteoblast-like cells and osteoclasts.

Authors:  A Bernhardt; R Dittrich; A Lode; F Despang; M Gelinsky
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Carbon-centered radicals in γ-irradiated bone substituting biomaterials based on hydroxyapatite.

Authors:  Jaroslaw Sadlo; Grazyna Strzelczak; Malgorzata Lewandowska-Szumiel; Marcin Sterniczuk; Lukasz Pajchel; Jacek Michalik
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in 3-D Zr-Si organic-inorganic scaffolds produced by two-photon polymerization technique.

Authors:  Anastasia Koroleva; Andrea Deiwick; Alexander Nguyen; Sabrina Schlie-Wolter; Roger Narayan; Peter Timashev; Vladimir Popov; Viktor Bagratashvili; Boris Chichkov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effects of BMP-2 Delivery in Calcium Phosphate Bone Graft Materials with Different Compositions on Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Jin-Chul Park; Eun-Bin Bae; Se-Eun Kim; So-Yun Kim; Kyung-Hee Choi; Jae-Won Choi; Ji-Hyeon Bae; Jae-Jun Ryu; Jung-Bo Huh
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  The Effect of Bisphasic Calcium Phosphate Block Bone Graft Materials with Polysaccharides on Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Hyun-Sang Yoo; Ji-Hyeon Bae; Se-Eun Kim; Eun-Bin Bae; So-Yeun Kim; Kyung-Hee Choi; Keum-Ok Moon; Chang-Mo Jeong; Jung-Bo Huh
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Release of Antibiotics Out of a Moldable Collagen-β-Tricalciumphosphate-Composite Compared to Two Calcium Phosphate Granules.

Authors:  Klaus Edgar Roth; Gerrit Steffen Maier; Irene Schmidtmann; Ulrich Eigner; Wolf Dietrich Hübner; Fabian Peters; Philipp Drees; Uwe Maus
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Effects of apatite particle size in two apatite/collagen composites on the osteogenic differentiation profile of osteoblastic cells.

Authors:  Wataru Hatakeyama; Masayuki Taira; Naoyuki Chosa; Hidemichi Kihara; Akira Ishisaki; Hisatomo Kondo
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 4.101

9.  Bone regeneration of a polymeric sponge technique-Alloplastic bone substitute materials compared with a commercial synthetic bone material (MBCP+TM technology): A histomorphometric study in porcine skull.

Authors:  Punyada Intapibool; Naruporn Monmaturapoj; Katanchalee Nampuksa; Kriangkrai Thongkorn; Pathawee Khongkhunthian
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2021-01-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.