Literature DB >> 22092885

Atlas-based versus individual-based fiber tracking of the corpus callosum in patients with multiple sclerosis: reliability and clinical correlations.

Maria Marcella Laganà1, Antonia Ceccarelli, Maria Giulia Preti, Chiara Venturelli, Maria Pia Sormani, Rosella Cavarretta, Giuseppe Baselli, Pietro Cecconi, Domenico Caputo, Marco Rovaris.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: In multiple sclerosis (MS), the presence of lesions and normal-appearing white matter damage may affect the reliability of diffusion tensor (DT) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based tractography. We compared the performance of an individual-based method for corpus callosum (CC) fiber tracking in MS with those of two atlas-based methods.
METHODS: Brain DT MRI scans were acquired from 35 patients with MS and 18 age-matched healthy volunteers (HV). DT-derived metrics from the CC-the mean diffusivity (MD) and fractional anisotropy (FA)-were calculated using an individual-based and two atlas-based methods with different types of subject registration (linear and nonlinear) to a CC atlas. Customized termination criteria were applied to stop the tracking algorithm when using the individual-based method.
RESULTS: All the methods were able to distinguish between MS patients and HV. Using the individual-based method, stronger relationships were found between CC DT-derived metrics and the subjects' clinical condition.
CONCLUSION: CC DT tractography using an individual-based method is more sensitive than the atlas-based ones to tract-specific alterations related to MS disability. An atlas-based method with nonlinear registration can be a valid alternative when an automated postprocessing is warranted, such as in the case of high volumes of data.
Copyright © 2011 by the American Society of Neuroimaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22092885     DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2011.00650.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neuroimaging        ISSN: 1051-2284            Impact factor:   2.486


  3 in total

1.  Tractography in the presence of multiple sclerosis lesions.

Authors:  Ilona Lipp; Greg D Parker; Emma C Tallantyre; Alex Goodall; Steluta Grama; Eleonora Patitucci; Phoebe Heveron; Valentina Tomassini; Derek K Jones
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 7.400

2.  Determinants of disability in multiple sclerosis: an immunological and MRI study.

Authors:  Paola Tortorella; Maria Marcella Laganà; Marina Saresella; Eleonora Tavazzi; Maria Giulia Preti; Cristian Ricci; Francesca Baglio; Ivana Marventano; Federica Piancone; Giuseppe Baselli; Pietro Cecconi; Domenico Caputo; Mario Clerici; Marco Rovaris
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  White matter tract-specific quantitative analysis in multiple sclerosis: Comparison of optic radiation reconstruction techniques.

Authors:  Chenyu Wang; Alexander Klistorner; Linda Ly; Michael H Barnett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.