Literature DB >> 22092539

Stem cell treatments in China: rethinking the patient role in the global bio-economy.

Haidan Chen1, Herbert Gottweis.   

Abstract

The paper looks in detail at patients that were treated at one of the most discussed companies operating in the field of untried stem cell treatments, Beike Biotech of Shenzhen, China. Our data show that patients who had been treated at Beike Biotech view themselves as proactively pursuing treatment choices that are not available in their home countries. These patients typically come from a broad variety of countries: China, the United Kingdom, the United States, South Africa and Australia. Among the patients we interviewed there seemed to be both an awareness of the general risks involved in such experimental treatments and a readiness to accept those risks weighed against the possible benefits. We interpret this evidence as possibly reflecting the emergence of risk-taking patients as 'consumers' of medical options as well as the drive of patients to seek treatment options in the global arena, rather than being hindered by the ethical and regulatory constraints of their home countries. Further, we found that these patients tend to operate in more or less stable networks and groups in which they interact and cooperate closely and develop opinions and assessments of available treatment options for their ailments. These patients also perform a multiple role as patients, research subjects, and research funders because they are required to pay their way into treatment and research activities. This new social dynamics of patienthood has important implications for the ethical governance of stem cell treatments.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22092539     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01929.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioethics        ISSN: 0269-9702            Impact factor:   1.898


  7 in total

1.  Chinese newspaper coverage of (unproven) stem cell therapies and their providers.

Authors:  Ubaka Ogbogu; Li Du; Christen Rachul; Lisa Bélanger; Timothy Caulfield
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.739

2.  Challenging misinformation and engaging patients: characterizing a regenerative medicine consult service.

Authors:  Cambray Smith; Charlene Martin-Lillie; Jennifer Dens Higano; Leigh Turner; Sydney Phu; Jennifer Arthurs; Timothy J Nelson; Shane Shapiro; Zubin Master
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.806

3.  A Dichotomy of Information-Seeking and Information-Trusting: Stem Cell Interventions and Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders.

Authors:  Kimberly Sharpe; Nina Di Pietro; Karen J Jacob; Judy Illes
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.739

4.  Regulatory brokerage: Competitive advantage and regulation in the field of regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Margaret Sleeboom-Faulkner
Journal:  Soc Stud Sci       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.885

5.  Analysis of the Circular Economic Production Models and Their Approach in Agriculture and Agricultural Waste Biomass Management.

Authors:  Mónica Duque-Acevedo; Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña; Natalia Yakovleva; Francisco Camacho-Ferre
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-20       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Marketing Experimental Stem Cell Therapies in the UK: Biomedical Lifestyle Products and the Promise of Regenerative Medicine in the Digital Era.

Authors:  Sonja Erikainen; Anna Couturier; Sarah Chan
Journal:  Sci Cult (Lond)       Date:  2019-09-24

7.  Current and emerging global themes in the bioethics of regenerative medicine: the tangled web of stem cell translation.

Authors:  Sarah Chan
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.806

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.