Literature DB >> 22092491

Influence of implants with different sizes and configurations installed immediately into extraction sockets on peri-implant hard and soft tissues: an experimental study in dogs.

Marco Caneva1, Daniele Botticelli, Fabio Rossi, Leandro Carvalho Cardoso, Fabio Pantani, Niklaus P Lang.   

Abstract

AIM: To study the influence on the healing of soft and hard peri-implant tissues when implants of different sizes and configurations were installed into sockets immediately after tooth extraction.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Transmucosal cylindrical implants, 3.3 mm in diameter in the control sites, and conical 5 mm in diameter in the test sites, were installed into the distal socket of the fourth mandibular premolars in dogs immediately after tooth extraction. After 4 months, the hard and soft tissue healing was evaluated histologically.
RESULTS: All implants were integrated in mineralized mature bone. Both at the test and control sites, the alveolar crest underwent resorption. The buccal bony surface at the implant test sites (conical; 3.8 mm) was more resorbed compared with the control sites (cylindrical; 1.6 mm). The soft tissue dimensions were similar in both groups. However, in relation to the implant shoulder, the peri-implant mucosa was located more apically at the test compared with the control sites.
CONCLUSION: The present study confirmed that the distance between the implant surface and the outer contour of the buccal alveolar bony crest influenced the degree of resorption of the buccal bone plate. Consequently, in relation to the implant shoulder, the peri-implant mucosa will be established at a more apical level, if the distance between the implant surface and the outer contour of the alveolar crest is small.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22092491     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02310.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  6 in total

Review 1.  Clinical and esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placement compared to alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Santiago Mareque; Pablo Castelo-Baz; Joaquín López-Malla; Juan Blanco; José Nart; Cristina Vallés
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Postextraction alveolar ridge preservation: biological basis and treatments.

Authors:  Giorgio Pagni; Gaia Pellegrini; William V Giannobile; Giulio Rasperini
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-06-12

3.  Thickness of the buccal bone wall and root angulation in the maxilla and mandible: an approach to cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  P López-Jarana; C M Díaz-Castro; A Falcão; C Falcão; J V Ríos-Santos; M Herrero-Climent
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  Peri-implant tissue alteration around tissue-level and bone-level implants in fresh extraction sockets: a histomorphometric study in dogs.

Authors:  Chunan Zhang; Xu Zhao; Shichong Qiao; Xiaomeng Zhang; Hongchang Lai; Yingxin Gu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-02

5.  Narrow- versus mini-implants at crestal and subcrestal bone levels. Experimental study in beagle dogs at three months.

Authors:  José Luis Calvo-Guirado; Carlos Pérez-Albacete; Antonio Aguilar-Salvatierra; José E de Val Maté-Sánchez; Rafael A Delgado-Ruiz; Marcus Abboud; Eugenio Velasco; Gerardo Gómez-Moreno; Georgios E Romanos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Immediate Nonfunctional Loading of Two Single-Maxillary Postextractive Implants: 6-Year Postloading Results of Two Case Reports.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ariano; Manuele Mancini; Andrea Cardi; Roberta Condò; Loredana Cerroni; Guido Pasquantonio
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2016-05-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.