Literature DB >> 22092485

Clinical, histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of socket preservation using a synthetic nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite in comparison with a bovine xenograft: a randomized clinical trial.

Gholam Ali Gholami1, Babak Najafi, Fatemeh Mashhadiabbas, Werner Goetz, Siamak Najafi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare a nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (NCHA), NanoBone(®) and a deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM), Bio-Oss(®) with a collagen membrane on the horizontal ridge width alterations following tooth extraction, in addition to histologic aspects of the grafted extraction sockets.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial, 28 symmetrical, non-molar, extraction sockets using a split-mouth design in 12 patients (eight women and four men; aged 21-60; mean 44.6 ± 11.4 years), were randomly selected in the first group to be grafted with DBBM granules covered with a collagen membrane and in the other group grafted with NCHA covered with a collagen membrane. Following extraction horizontal ridge width was measured using caliper and was blindly compared to the dimensions measured prior to implant placement, at the 6- to 8-month follow-up. Subsequently, a 2 × 6 mm trephine core was obtained with aid of acrylic stent and routine histologic preparation was performed on the specimens.
RESULTS: The width of the DBBM group decreased from 7.75 ± 1.55 to 6.68 ± 1.85 mm (P < 0.05), whereas the width of the NCHA group decreased from 7.36 ± 1.94 to 6.43 ± 2.08 mm (P < 0.05). The mean between-group difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.62). Furthermore, histologic and histomorphometric analyses revealed 28.63 ± 12.53% vital bone in NCHA group vs. 27.35 ± 12.39% in DBBM group, and no statistically significant difference between the groups (P = 0.68).
CONCLUSION: Socket preservation using either NCHA or DBBM in combination with collagen membrane, results in similar, limited horizontal ridge width alterations following tooth extraction.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22092485     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02288.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  17 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development.

Authors:  Momen A Atieh; Nabeel H M Alsabeeha; Alan G T Payne; Warwick Duncan; Clovis M Faggion; Marco Esposito
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-05-28

2.  Carbon-centered radicals in γ-irradiated bone substituting biomaterials based on hydroxyapatite.

Authors:  Jaroslaw Sadlo; Grazyna Strzelczak; Malgorzata Lewandowska-Szumiel; Marcin Sterniczuk; Lukasz Pajchel; Jacek Michalik
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 3.  A comparison between anorganic bone and collagen-preserving bone xenografts for alveolar ridge preservation: systematic review and future perspectives.

Authors:  Danilo Alessio Di Stefano; Francesco Orlando; Marco Ottobelli; Davide Fiori; Umberto Garagiola
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2022-07-12

Review 4.  Dimensional and histomorphometric evaluation of biomaterials used for alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  L Canullo; M Del Fabbro; S Khijmatgar; S Panda; A Ravidà; G Tommasato; A Sculean; P Pesce
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.606

5.  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development.

Authors:  Momen A Atieh; Nabeel Hm Alsabeeha; Alan Gt Payne; Sara Ali; Clovis M Jr Faggion; Marco Esposito
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-26

6.  Conservative Socket Regeneration with Buccal Wall Defect Using Guided Tissue.

Authors:  Mohammed Jasim Al-Juboori
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2016-10-31

7.  Localized ridge augmentation in the anterior maxilla using titanium mesh, an alloplast, and a nano-bone graft: a case report.

Authors:  Adel S Alagl; Marwa Madi
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 1.671

8.  Efficacy of Alveolar Ridge Preservation after Maxillary Molar Extraction in Reducing Crestal Bone Resorption and Sinus Pneumatization: A Multicenter Prospective Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Teresa Lombardi; Fabio Bernardello; Federico Berton; Davide Porrelli; Antonio Rapani; Alvise Camurri Piloni; Luca Fiorillo; Roberto Di Lenarda; Claudio Stacchi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-11-04       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  A randomized controlled evaluation of alveolar ridge preservation following tooth extraction using deproteinized bovine bone mineral and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft.

Authors:  Rokhsareh Sadeghi; Maryam Babaei; S Asghar Miremadi; Fatemeh Mashadi Abbas
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr

10.  Assessment of dehydrothermally cross-linked collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration around peri-implant dehiscence defects: a randomized single-blinded clinical trial.

Authors:  Jae-Hong Lee; Jung-Seok Lee; Won-Sun Baek; Hyun-Chang Lim; Jae-Kook Cha; Seong-Ho Choi; Ui-Won Jung
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 2.614

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.