Literature DB >> 22092476

A phase IIa randomized controlled clinical and histological pilot study evaluating rhGDF-5/β-TCP for periodontal regeneration.

Andreas Stavropoulos1, Peter Windisch, Istvan Gera, Björn Capsius, Anton Sculean, Ulf M E Wikesjö.   

Abstract

AIM: The primary objective of this study was to clinically and histologically evaluate periodontal wound healing/regeneration following surgical implantation of recombinant human growth/differentiation factor-5 (rhGDF-5) adsorbed onto a particulate β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) carrier rhGDF-5/β-TCP into periodontal defects in man. MATERIAL &
METHODS: Twenty chronic periodontitis patients, each with at least one tooth scheduled for extraction exhibiting a probing depth ≥6 mm and an associated intra-bony defect ≥4 mm participated in the study upon written informed consent. Subjects (one defect/patient) were randomized to receive open flap debridement (OFD) + rhGDF-5/β-TCP (n = 10) or OFD alone (control; n = 10). Block biopsies of the defect sites were collected at 6 months post-surgery and prepared for the histological evaluation. Two masked examiners evaluated the deepest aspect of each defect site relative to bone (height/area), periodontal ligament (PDL) and cementum regeneration, and residual β-TCP.
RESULTS: Sites receiving rhGDF-5/β-TCP showed numerically greater PD reduction (3.7 ± 1.2 versus 3.1 ± 1.8 mm; p = 0.26), less gingival recession (0.5 ± 0.8 versus 1.4 ± 1.0 mm; p < 0.05) and greater clinical attachment level (CAL) gain (3.2 ± 1.7 versus 1.7 ± 2.2 mm; p = 0.14) at the deepest aspect of the defect compared with OFD alone. One biopsy in the rhGDF-5/β-TCP and four biopsies in the OFD group were deemed as not evaluable. Histologically, bone regeneration height was almost threefold greater for the rhGDF-5/β-TCP treatment compared with OFD alone (2.19 ± 1.59 versus 0.81 ± 1.02 mm; p = 0.08). Similarly an almost twofold increase was observed for PDL (2.16 ± 1.43 versus 1.23 ± 1.07 mm; p = 0.26), cementum (2.16 ± 1.43 versus 1.23 ± 1.07 mm; p = 0.26) and bone regeneration area (0.74 ± 0.69 versus 0.32 ± 0.47 mm(2) ; p = 0.14). Root resorption/ankylosis was not observed. Residual β-TCP occupied 8.4 ± 11.5% of the area of interest in biopsies of patients receiving rhGDF-5/β-TCP. Five biopsies (one rhGDF-5/β-TCP, four OFD) were deemed unsuitable to allow a meaningful histological or histometrical evaluation.
CONCLUSIONS: Descriptive statistics showed greater PD reduction and CAL gain, and greater alveolar bone regeneration and periodontal regeneration at sites that received rhGDF-5/β-TCP compared to control. However, these differences were not statistically significant. Future studies with larger sample sizes will have to be conducted to verify these findings.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22092476     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01778.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Periodontol        ISSN: 0303-6979            Impact factor:   8.728


  8 in total

1.  A phase IIa randomized controlled pilot study evaluating the safety and clinical outcomes following the use of rhGDF-5/β-TCP in regenerative periodontal therapy.

Authors:  Péter Windisch; Andreas Stavropoulos; Bálint Molnár; Dóra Szendröi-Kiss; Emese Szilágyi; Péter Rosta; Attila Horváth; Björn Capsius; Ulf M E Wikesjö; Anton Sculean
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Platelet-derived growth factor promotes periodontal regeneration in localized osseous defects: 36-month extension results from a randomized, controlled, double-masked clinical trial.

Authors:  Myron Nevins; Richard T Kao; Michael K McGuire; Pamela K McClain; James E Hinrichs; Bradley S McAllister; Michael S Reddy; Marc L Nevins; Robert J Genco; Samuel E Lynch; William V Giannobile
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 6.993

3.  Optimized cell survival and seeding efficiency for craniofacial tissue engineering using clinical stem cell therapy.

Authors:  Archana Rajan; Emily Eubanks; Sean Edwards; Sharon Aronovich; Suncica Travan; Ivan Rudek; Feng Wang; Alejandro Lanis; Darnell Kaigler
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 6.940

4.  Current and future trends in periodontal tissue engineering and bone regeneration.

Authors:  Matthew Galli; Yao Yao; William V Giannobile; Hom-Lay Wang
Journal:  Plast Aesthet Res       Date:  2021-01-08

5.  Bone morphogenetic proteins: periodontal regeneration.

Authors:  Subramaniam M Rao; Gauri M Ugale; Shivaraj B Warad
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2013-03

6.  β-TCP/HA with or without enamel matrix proteins for maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a histomorphometric analysis of human biopsies.

Authors:  James Carlos Nery; Luís Antônio Violin Dias Pereira; George Furtado Guimarães; Cassio Rocha Scardueli; Fabiana Mantovani Gomes França; Rubens Spin-Neto; Andreas Stavropoulos
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2017-05-04

7.  Medium- and long-term clinical benefits of periodontal regenerative/reconstructive procedures in intrabony defects: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical studies.

Authors:  Andreas Stavropoulos; Kristina Bertl; Loukia M Spineli; Anton Sculean; Pierpaolo Cortellini; Maurizio Tonetti
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 8.728

8.  Recent advances in periodontal regeneration: A biomaterial perspective.

Authors:  Yongxi Liang; Xianghong Luan; Xiaohua Liu
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2020-02-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.