Literature DB >> 22092377

Comparative histological results of different biomaterials used in sinus augmentation procedures: a human study at 6 months.

Giovanna Iezzi1, Marco Degidi, Adriano Piattelli, Carlo Mangano, Antonio Scarano, Jamil A Shibli, Vittoria Perrotti.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Various grafts or combination of graft materials have been used in sinus floor augmentations, and human histological reports on their performance are available, although limited in number. Histological analysis of the regenerated tissues will provide useful information regarding the nature and amount of newly formed bone. Aim of the present study was a histological and histomorphometric evaluation, in humans, of specimens retrieved from sinuses augmented with phycogene hydroxyapatite, biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics, calcium carbonate, porcine bone and anorganic bovine bone, after a healing period of 6 months.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 15 patients, undergoing 30 sinus augmentation procedures with five different biomaterials, participated in this study. A total of 82 titanium dental implants were inserted in the augmented sinuses after a healing period of 6 months. A total of 60 bone cores, 2 for each augmented sinus, 12 for every biomaterial, were retrieved and all were stored immediately in 10% buffered formalin and processed to obtain thin ground sections.
RESULTS: In all biomaterials, many grafted particles were lined and, sometimes, bridged by newly formed bone. Some biomaterials particles appeared to be partially resorbed and substituted by newly formed bone. Histomorphometry showed that, in all biomaterials, newly formed bone and residual grafted material particles represented about 30%.
CONCLUSIONS: Longer term histological and histomorphometric studies will be necessary to understand better the resorption times of all these biomaterials. The high interconnecting microporosity allowed, in all the present biomaterials, the ingrowth of newly formed bone and vessels in the pores of the partially resorbed particles. In conclusion, within the limitations of the present study, the data provided support the fact that all these biomaterials can be used, successfully, in sinus augmentation procedures.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22092377     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02308.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  16 in total

1.  Tissue reactions after simultaneous alveolar ridge augmentation with biphasic calcium phosphate and implant insertion--histological and immunohistochemical evaluation in humans.

Authors:  Anton Friedmann; Kirsten Gissel; Anna Konermann; Werner Götz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Histological and Biological Response to Different Types of Biomaterials: A Narrative Single Research Center Experience over Three Decades.

Authors:  Margherita Tumedei; Eitan Mijiritsky; Carlos Fernando Mourão; Adriano Piattelli; Marco Degidi; Carlo Mangano; Giovanna Iezzi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Histological and Histomorphometric Human Results of HA-Beta-TCP 30/70 Compared to Three Different Biomaterials in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation at 6 Months: A Preliminary Report.

Authors:  Susanna Annibali; Giovanna Iezzi; Gian Luca Sfasciotti; Maria Paola Cristalli; Iole Vozza; Carlo Mangano; Gerardo La Monaca; Antonella Polimeni
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Case presentation of two patients using diagonal platform-switched double implants for maxillary single-first-molar replacement as the alternative of a single-tooth implant.

Authors:  Yasunori Hotta; Koji Ito; Shinichi Komatsu; Takashi Saito
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2015-11-12

5.  The use of hydroxyapatite bone substitute grafting for alveolar ridge preservation, sinus augmentation, and periodontal bone defect: A systematic review.

Authors:  Anne Handrini Dewi; Ika Dewi Ana
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2018-11-02

6.  A retrospective preliminary histomorphometric and clinical investigation on sinus augmentation using enzyme-deantigenic, collagen-preserving equine bone granules and plasma rich in growth factors.

Authors:  Danilo Alessio Di Stefano; Raffaele Vinci; Paolo Capparè; Enrico Felice Gherlone
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-06-11

Review 7.  Bone Grafts and Substitutes in Dentistry: A Review of Current Trends and Developments.

Authors:  Rusin Zhao; Ruijia Yang; Paul R Cooper; Zohaib Khurshid; Amin Shavandi; Jithendra Ratnayake
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  Space maintenance in autogenous fresh demineralized tooth blocks with platelet-rich plasma for maxillary sinus bone formation: a prospective study.

Authors:  Eun-Suk Kim; Ji-Yeon Kang; Jae-Jin Kim; Kyoung-Won Kim; Eun-Young Lee
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-03-07

9.  Three-Dimensional Assessment of Volumetric Changes in Sinuses Augmented with Two Different Bone Substitutes.

Authors:  B Alper Gultekin; Oguz Borahan; Ali Sirali; Z Cuneyt Karabuda; Eitan Mijiritsky
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Comparative Histological and Histomorphometric Results of Six Biomaterials Used in Two-Stage Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Model after 6-Month Healing.

Authors:  Gerardo La Monaca; Giovanna Iezzi; Maria Paola Cristalli; Nicola Pranno; Gian Luca Sfasciotti; Iole Vozza
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.