Literature DB >> 22092206

GlideScope videolaryngoscope vs. Macintosh direct laryngoscope for intubation of morbidly obese patients: a randomized trial.

L H Andersen1, L Rovsing, K S Olsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Morbidly obese patients are at increased risk of hypoxemia during tracheal intubation because of increased frequency of difficult and impossible intubation and a decreased apnea tolerance. In this study, intubation with the GlideScope videolaryngoscope (GS) was compared with the Macintosh direct laryngoscope (DL) in a group of morbidly obese patients.
METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients (body mass index ≥ 35 kg/m(2) ) scheduled for bariatric surgery were randomized 1 : 1 to intubation with GS (group GS) or DL (group DL). The primary outcome was intubation time. Secondary outcomes were number of attempts, Cormack-Lehane grade, intubation difficulty scale score (IDS), subjective difficulty of intubation, desaturation, airway bleeding, postoperative sore throat, and hoarseness. Group assignment was not blinded.
RESULTS: Intubation in group GS and group DL lasted 48 (22-148) and 32 s (17-209), respectively (median (range); P = 0.0001); median difference 11 s (95% confidence interval 6-17). Laryngoscopic views were better in group GS with Cormack-Lehane grades 1/2/3/4 distributed as 35/13/2/0 vs. 23/13/10/4 in group DL (P = 0.003). IDS scores were significantly lower with GS than with DL. No other statistically significant differences were found. Two cases of failed intubation occurred in group DL vs. none in group GS (non-significant). Both patients were intubated with the GlideScope without problems.
CONCLUSION: Intubation of morbidly obese patients with GS was slightly slower than with DL. The increased intubation time was of no clinical consequence as no patients became hypoxemic. Both devices generally performed well in the studied population, but the GS provided better laryngoscopic views and decreased IDS scores. 2011 The Authors Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2011 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22092206     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02498.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  23 in total

1.  Comparison of GlideScope video laryngoscopy and Macintosh laryngoscope in ear-nose and throat surgery.

Authors:  G Misirlioglu; O Sen
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 2.  [Video laryngoscopy olé! Time to say good bye to direct and flexible intubation?].

Authors:  S G Russo; M Weiss; C Eich
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation.

Authors:  Jan Hansel; Andrew M Rogers; Sharon R Lewis; Tim M Cook; Andrew F Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-04-04

Review 4.  GlideScope video laryngoscopy use tracheal intubation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a series of four cases and literature review.

Authors:  Vahap Saricicek; Ayse Mizrak; Rauf Gul; Sitki Goksu; Mehmet Cesur
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  A comparison of the GlideScope video laryngoscope to the C-MAC video laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department.

Authors:  Jarrod Mosier; Stephen Chiu; Asad E Patanwala; John C Sakles
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 6.  Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Andrew R Butler; Joshua Parker; Tim M Cook; Andrew F Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-15

7.  Post operative sore throat: Comparison between Macintosh versus Video Laryngoscope in patients intubated by trainee anaesthetists - A Randomised Control Trial.

Authors:  Amin Ahmed Kapadia; Faraz Shafiq; Amir Raza
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2021 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.088

8.  Evaluation of the GlideScope Direct: A New Video Laryngoscope for Teaching Direct Laryngoscopy.

Authors:  Darwin Viernes; Allan J Goldman; Richard E Galgon; Aaron M Joffe
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-06-24

9.  The difficult airway with recommendations for management--part 1--difficult tracheal intubation encountered in an unconscious/induced patient.

Authors:  J Adam Law; Natasha Broemling; Richard M Cooper; Pierre Drolet; Laura V Duggan; Donald E Griesdale; Orlando R Hung; Philip M Jones; George Kovacs; Simon Massey; Ian R Morris; Timothy Mullen; Michael F Murphy; Roanne Preston; Viren N Naik; Jeanette Scott; Shean Stacey; Timothy P Turkstra; David T Wong
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 5.063

10.  A comparison of performance of endotracheal intubation using the Levitan FPS optical stylet or Lary-Flex videolaryngoscope in morbidly obese patients.

Authors:  Tomasz Gaszynski; Monika Pietrzyk; Tomasz Szewczyk; Ewelina Gaszynska
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-05-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.