Literature DB >> 22092150

Patient participation in medical and social decisions in Alzheimer's disease.

Johannes Hamann1, Katharina Bronner, Julia Margull, Rosmarie Mendel, Janine Diehl-Schmid, Markus Bühner, Reinhold Klein, Antonius Schneider, Alexander Kurz, Robert Perneczky.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the preferences of people with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and mild dementia in Alzheimer's disease (AD) regarding different aspects of healthcare-related decisions, to correlate these findings with different measures of decision-making capacity, and to explore the views of relatives and referring physicians.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey.
SETTING: University-based memory clinic in Munich, Germany. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred people with aMCI or mild AD, their relatives (N = 99), and their referring physicians (N = 93). MEASUREMENTS: Participation preferences and decisional capacity and assessment of these measures according to relatives and physicians.
RESULTS: Patients had a preference for participation in healthcare-related decisions, especially in social ones. Overall, individuals wanted their relatives to play a secondary role in decision-making. Relatives and referring physicians performed poorly in predicting the individuals' participation preferences, and relatives wanted to attribute less decision-making power to patients than the patients did themselves. Patients refrained from participation if they had lower Mini-Mental State Examination scores or were unsure about their decisional capacity. There were deficits in decision-making capacity, which mostly related to understanding of the information presented. There was only weak correlation between the different measures (patient's, relative's, and physician's estimate, MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment) of the patients' decisional capacity.
CONCLUSION: The combination of marked participation preferences and impairments in the decisional capacity of individuals with aMCI and early AD constitute an ethical and practical challenge. A thorough implementation of structured probes of the patients' decisional capacity combined with interventions that aid patients in their decision-making capability might help to overcome some of these challenges.
© 2011, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2011, The American Geriatrics Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22092150     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03661.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  19 in total

Review 1.  Decision-Making Competence in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Fanny Gaubert; Hanna Chainay
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 7.444

2.  Informed consent, participation in research, and the Alzheimer's patient.

Authors:  Edmund Howe
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2012-05

3.  Shared decision making in mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Andrea M Mejia; Glenn E Smith; Meredith Wicklund; Melissa J Armstrong
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2019-04

Review 4.  Urgent care for patients with dementia: a scoping review of associated factors and stakeholder experiences.

Authors:  Jemima Dooley; Matthew Booker; Rebecca Barnes; Penny Xanthopoulou
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  [Acceptance of dementia diagnostics by getriatric hospital patients : Comparison of various investigation methods with emphasis on FDG-PET imaging].

Authors:  Melanie Estrella; Anna Roberts; Anja Mäurer; Jochen Fiebach; Ralph Buchert; Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen; Oliver Peters; Herlind Megges
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 1.281

6.  Patient values in healthcare decision making among diverse older adults.

Authors:  Andrea M Kurasz; Glenn E Smith; Rosie E Curiel; Warren W Barker; Raquel C Behar; Alexandra Ramirez; Melissa J Armstrong
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2021-08-28

Review 7.  Determining medical decision-making capacity in brain tumor patients: why and how?

Authors:  Andrea Pace; Johan A F Koekkoek; Martin J van den Bent; Helen J Bulbeck; Jane Fleming; Robin Grant; Heidrun Golla; Roger Henriksson; Simon Kerrigan; Christine Marosi; Ingela Oberg; Stefan Oberndorfer; Kathy Oliver; H Roeline W Pasman; Emilie Le Rhun; Alasdair G Rooney; Roberta Rudà; Simone Veronese; Tobias Walbert; Michael Weller; Wolfgang Wick; Martin J B Taphoorn; Linda Dirven
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2020-07-16

8.  Decisional capacity: toward an inclusionary approach.

Authors:  Carmelle Peisah; Oluwatoyin A Sorinmade; Leander Mitchell; Cees M P M Hertogh
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.878

9.  Involvement of people with dementia in making decisions about their lives: a qualitative study that appraises shared decision-making concerning daycare.

Authors:  Leontine Groen-van de Ven; Carolien Smits; Fuusje de Graaff; Marijke Span; Jan Eefsting; Jan Jukema; Myrra Vernooij-Dassen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-12       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Which medical and social decision topics are important after early diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease from the perspectives of people with Alzheimer's Disease, spouses and professionals?

Authors:  Katharina Bronner; Robert Perneczky; Rose McCabe; Alexander Kurz; Johannes Hamann
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2016-03-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.