Literature DB >> 22091929

The introduction of a choice to learn pre-symptomatic DNA test results for BRCA or Lynch syndrome either face-to-face or by letter.

J S Voorwinden1, J P C Jaspers, J G ter Beest, Y Kievit, R H Sijmons, J C Oosterwijk.   

Abstract

In predictive DNA testing for hereditary cancer, test results should traditionally be disclosed face-to-face. Increasingly, however, counselees ask to receive their test result at home by letter. To compare the quality of genetic counselling in the traditional way to a procedure in which counselees are offered a choice on how to get their test result. Counselees from families with a known BRCA1/2 or Lynch syndrome mutation were randomised into two groups. The control group was given the DNA test result in a face-to-face consultation. In the intervention group people could choose to learn their test result face-to-face or by letter. The quality of genetic counselling was assessed through questionnaires at three different moments. Data of 198 counselees were analysed. The quality of genetic counselling and psychological functioning were equally good in both groups. The majority of cases chose for disclosure by letter. The counselees with a good test result in the intervention group were the most satisfied. Our results indicate that in predictive DNA testing for BRCA1/2 and Lynch syndrome, a choice protocol is equally safe and more satisfying. Moreover, it is more efficient for both counsellor and counselee.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22091929     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01811.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  5 in total

Review 1.  A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials to Assess Outcomes of Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Barbara A Athens; Samantha L Caldwell; Kendall L Umstead; Philip D Connors; Ethan Brenna; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  More breast cancer patients prefer BRCA-mutation testing without prior face-to-face genetic counseling.

Authors:  Aisha S Sie; Wendy A G van Zelst-Stams; Liesbeth Spruijt; Arjen R Mensenkamp; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Han G Brunner; Judith B Prins; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Prognostic Factors for Distress After Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer.

Authors:  Jan S Voorwinden; Jan P C Jaspers
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  High Satisfaction and Low Distress in Breast Cancer Patients One Year after BRCA-Mutation Testing without Prior Face-to-Face Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Aisha S Sie; Liesbeth Spruijt; Wendy A G van Zelst-Stams; Arjen R Mensenkamp; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Han G Brunner; Judith B Prins; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  BRCAsearch: written pre-test information and BRCA1/2 germline mutation testing in unselected patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  Martin P Nilsson; Therese Törngren; Karin Henriksson; Ulf Kristoffersson; Anders Kvist; Barbro Silfverberg; Åke Borg; Niklas Loman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 4.872

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.