Literature DB >> 22091642

Methodology of photic stimulation revisited: updated European algorithm for visual stimulation in the EEG laboratory.

Dorothée Kasteleijn-Nolst Trenité1, Guido Rubboli, Edouard Hirsch, Antonio Martins da Silva, Stefano Seri, Arnold Wilkins, Jaime Parra, Athanasios Covanis, Maurizio Elia, Giuseppe Capovilla, Ulrich Stephani, Graham Harding.   

Abstract

Intermittent photic stimulation (IPS) is a common procedure performed in the electroencephalography (EEG) laboratory in children and adults to detect abnormal epileptogenic sensitivity to flickering light (i.e., photosensitivity). In practice, substantial variability in outcome is anecdotally found due to the many different methods used per laboratory and country. We believe that standardization of procedure, based on scientific and clinical data, should permit reproducible identification and quantification of photosensitivity. We hope that the use of our new algorithm will help in standardizing the IPS procedure, which in turn may more clearly identify and assist monitoring of patients with epilepsy and photosensitivity. Our algorithm goes far beyond that published in 1999 (Epilepsia, 1999a, 40, 75; Neurophysiol Clin, 1999b, 29, 318): it has substantially increased content, detailing technical and logistical aspects of IPS testing and the rationale for many of the steps in the IPS procedure. Furthermore, our latest algorithm incorporates the consensus of repeated scientific meetings of European experts in this field over a period of 6 years with feedback from general neurologists and epileptologists to improve its validity and utility. Accordingly, our European group has provided herein updated algorithms for two different levels of methodology: (1) requirements for defining photosensitivity in patients and in family members of known photosensitive patients and (2) requirements for tailored studies in patients with a clear history of visually induced seizures or complaints, and in those already known to be photosensitive. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
© 2011 International League Against Epilepsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22091642     DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03319.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsia        ISSN: 0013-9580            Impact factor:   5.864


  14 in total

1.  Seizure precipitants in a community-based epilepsy cohort.

Authors:  Merel Wassenaar; Dorothée G A Kasteleijn-Nolst Trenité; Gerrit-Jan de Haan; Johannes A Carpay; Frans S S Leijten
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  A commercially available device suppresses photic driving: implications for EEG recording.

Authors:  Sara Gasparini; Chiara Sueri; Tiziana D'Agostino; Vittoria Cianci; Cinzia Grazia Leonardi; Umberto Aguglia; Edoardo Ferlazzo
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2017-12-30       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  Extreme value theory inspires explainable machine learning approach for seizure detection.

Authors:  Oleg E Karpov; Vadim V Grubov; Vladimir A Maksimenko; Semen A Kurkin; Nikita M Smirnov; Nikita P Utyashev; Denis A Andrikov; Natalia N Shusharina; Alexander E Hramov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  CHD2 variants are a risk factor for photosensitivity in epilepsy.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Galizia; Candace T Myers; Costin Leu; Carolien G F de Kovel; Tatiana Afrikanova; Maria Lorena Cordero-Maldonado; Teresa G Martins; Maxime Jacmin; Suzanne Drury; V Krishna Chinthapalli; Hiltrud Muhle; Manuela Pendziwiat; Thomas Sander; Ann-Kathrin Ruppert; Rikke S Møller; Holger Thiele; Roland Krause; Julian Schubert; Anna-Elina Lehesjoki; Peter Nürnberg; Holger Lerche; Aarno Palotie; Antonietta Coppola; Salvatore Striano; Luigi Del Gaudio; Christopher Boustred; Amy L Schneider; Nicholas Lench; Bosanka Jocic-Jakubi; Athanasios Covanis; Giuseppe Capovilla; Pierangelo Veggiotti; Marta Piccioli; Pasquale Parisi; Laura Cantonetti; Lynette G Sadleir; Saul A Mullen; Samuel F Berkovic; Ulrich Stephani; Ingo Helbig; Alexander D Crawford; Camila V Esguerra; Dorothee G A Kasteleijn-Nolst Trenité; Bobby P C Koeleman; Heather C Mefford; Ingrid E Scheffer; Sanjay M Sisodiya
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 5.  Reorganization of Visual Callosal Connections Following Alterations of Retinal Input and Brain Damage.

Authors:  Laura Restani; Matteo Caleo
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-14

6.  Electroencephalographic Abnormalities in the Screening for Pilot Applicants in Korea.

Authors:  Dan A Oh; Hyeyun Kim; Eun Kee Bae
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.077

7.  Comparison of electroencephalographic findings with hippocampal magnetic resonance imaging volumetry in dogs with idiopathic epilepsy.

Authors:  Adriana Czerwik; Marta Płonek; Przemyslaw Podgórski; Marcin Wrzosek
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.333

8.  Rapidity of CNS Effect on Photoparoxysmal Response for Brivaracetam vs. Levetiracetam: A Randomized, Double-blind, Crossover Trial in Photosensitive Epilepsy Patients.

Authors:  Ronald C Reed; William E Rosenfeld; Susan M Lippmann; Rene M J C Eijkemans; Dorothee G A Kasteleijn-Nolst Trenité
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 5.749

9.  Kv7 potassium channel activation with ICA-105665 reduces photoparoxysmal EEG responses in patients with epilepsy.

Authors:  Dorotheé G A Kasteleijn-Nolst Trenité; Victor Biton; Jacqueline A French; Bassel Abou-Khalil; William E Rosenfeld; Bree Diventura; Elizabeth L Moore; Seth V Hetherington; Greg C Rigdon
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 5.864

10.  Neurostimulation stabilizes spiking neural networks by disrupting seizure-like oscillatory transitions.

Authors:  Scott Rich; Axel Hutt; Frances K Skinner; Taufik A Valiante; Jérémie Lefebvre
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.