Literature DB >> 22090972

3,8-Dimethyl-quinazoline-2,4(1H,3H)-dione.

Wei-Yan Qin1, Bo Liu, Cong-Wen Duan, Qing-Xiu Yin.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(10)H(10)N(2)O(2), all non-n class="Disease">H atoms are approximately co-planar with an r.m.s. deviation of 0.016 Å. In the crystal, mol-ecules are linked into inversion dimers by pairs of N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds. Chains along [010] are buiilt up by π-π inter-actions [centroid-centroid distance = 3.602 (1) Å] between the benzene and piperazine rings of adjacent mol-ecules.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22090972      PMCID: PMC3212315          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811025232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the synthesis and background to the title compound, see Feng et al. (2010 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C10H10N2O2 M = 190.20 Monoclinic, a = 8.3604 (17) Å b = 4.8599 (10) Å c = 22.288 (5) Å β = 92.09 (3)° V = 905.0 (3) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.10 mm−1 T = 295 K 0.29 × 0.23 × 0.19 mm

Data collection

Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995 ▶) T min = 0.972, T max = 0.981 8373 measured reflections 2085 independent reflections 1497 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.030

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.043 wR(F 2) = 0.143 S = 1.10 2085 reflections 133 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.22 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.18 e Å−3 Data collection: RAPID-AUTO (Rigaku, 1998 ▶); cell refinement: RAPID-AUTO; data reduction: CrystalStructure (Rigaku/MSC, 2002) ▶; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811025232/ng5192sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811025232/ng5192Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811025232/ng5192Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C10H10N2O2F(000) = 400
Mr = 190.20Dx = 1.396 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 6086 reflections
a = 8.3604 (17) Åθ = 3.0–27.5°
b = 4.8599 (10) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
c = 22.288 (5) ÅT = 295 K
β = 92.09 (3)°Block, colorless
V = 905.0 (3) Å30.29 × 0.23 × 0.19 mm
Z = 4
Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID diffractometer2085 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1497 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.030
ω scanθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.0°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995)h = −10→10
Tmin = 0.972, Tmax = 0.981k = −6→6
8373 measured reflectionsl = −28→28
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.043Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.143H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.10w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0833P)2 + 0.0221P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2085 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
133 parametersΔρmax = 0.22 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.18 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.36317 (16)0.6713 (2)0.37609 (6)0.0319 (3)
C20.47592 (17)0.4802 (3)0.35641 (6)0.0378 (3)
C30.43348 (19)0.3256 (3)0.30632 (7)0.0436 (4)
H30.50580.19650.29270.052*
C40.2866 (2)0.3552 (3)0.27525 (7)0.0459 (4)
H40.26250.24810.24150.055*
C50.17879 (18)0.5421 (3)0.29463 (6)0.0420 (4)
H50.08070.56330.27410.050*
C60.21521 (16)0.7020 (3)0.34530 (6)0.0343 (3)
C70.09745 (16)0.8962 (3)0.36722 (6)0.0371 (3)
C80.29243 (17)1.0222 (3)0.44833 (6)0.0359 (3)
C90.03023 (19)1.2458 (4)0.44098 (7)0.0499 (4)
H9A0.07861.34290.47450.075*
H9B−0.06321.15020.45360.075*
H9C0.00021.37430.40990.075*
C100.63640 (19)0.4454 (4)0.38882 (8)0.0536 (4)
H10A0.69560.30270.36980.080*
H10B0.62060.39630.42990.080*
H10C0.69500.61500.38740.080*
N10.14501 (13)1.0469 (2)0.41799 (5)0.0374 (3)
H10.486 (2)0.829 (3)0.4482 (8)0.056 (5)*
N20.39514 (14)0.8334 (2)0.42650 (5)0.0368 (3)
O1−0.03642 (13)0.9286 (3)0.34450 (5)0.0551 (4)
O20.32575 (13)1.1631 (2)0.49285 (5)0.0510 (3)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0322 (7)0.0340 (6)0.0292 (6)−0.0020 (5)−0.0025 (5)0.0018 (5)
C20.0353 (7)0.0401 (7)0.0378 (7)0.0022 (6)0.0001 (6)0.0014 (6)
C30.0483 (9)0.0425 (8)0.0404 (8)0.0021 (7)0.0063 (6)−0.0053 (6)
C40.0548 (9)0.0472 (8)0.0354 (7)−0.0065 (7)−0.0019 (7)−0.0077 (6)
C50.0393 (8)0.0504 (8)0.0355 (7)−0.0073 (7)−0.0088 (6)0.0019 (6)
C60.0329 (7)0.0372 (7)0.0324 (7)−0.0013 (6)−0.0040 (5)0.0042 (5)
C70.0321 (7)0.0425 (7)0.0361 (7)−0.0007 (6)−0.0069 (5)0.0052 (6)
C80.0321 (7)0.0410 (7)0.0343 (7)0.0042 (6)−0.0046 (5)−0.0005 (6)
C90.0401 (8)0.0572 (9)0.0522 (9)0.0160 (7)0.0007 (7)−0.0022 (8)
C100.0378 (8)0.0624 (10)0.0599 (10)0.0144 (8)−0.0063 (7)−0.0102 (8)
N10.0291 (6)0.0434 (6)0.0393 (6)0.0069 (5)−0.0045 (5)0.0007 (5)
N20.0306 (6)0.0436 (6)0.0356 (6)0.0068 (5)−0.0081 (5)−0.0050 (5)
O10.0362 (6)0.0710 (8)0.0566 (7)0.0086 (5)−0.0182 (5)−0.0021 (6)
O20.0438 (6)0.0614 (7)0.0467 (6)0.0140 (5)−0.0139 (5)−0.0198 (5)
C1—N21.3901 (17)C7—N11.3938 (17)
C1—C61.4005 (18)C8—O21.2291 (17)
C1—C21.4049 (19)C8—N21.3588 (18)
C2—C31.381 (2)C8—N11.3891 (17)
C2—C101.5099 (19)C9—N11.4675 (19)
C3—C41.395 (2)C9—H9A0.9600
C3—H30.9300C9—H9B0.9600
C4—C51.361 (2)C9—H9C0.9600
C4—H40.9300C10—H10A0.9600
C5—C61.395 (2)C10—H10B0.9600
C5—H50.9300C10—H10C0.9600
C6—C71.461 (2)N2—H10.888 (19)
C7—O11.2217 (16)
N2—C1—C6118.44 (12)O2—C8—N2122.52 (12)
N2—C1—C2121.04 (11)O2—C8—N1121.05 (13)
C6—C1—C2120.52 (12)N2—C8—N1116.43 (11)
C3—C2—C1117.16 (13)N1—C9—H9A109.5
C3—C2—C10121.54 (13)N1—C9—H9B109.5
C1—C2—C10121.29 (12)H9A—C9—H9B109.5
C2—C3—C4122.73 (14)N1—C9—H9C109.5
C2—C3—H3118.6H9A—C9—H9C109.5
C4—C3—H3118.6H9B—C9—H9C109.5
C5—C4—C3119.49 (13)C2—C10—H10A109.5
C5—C4—H4120.3C2—C10—H10B109.5
C3—C4—H4120.3H10A—C10—H10B109.5
C4—C5—C6120.07 (13)C2—C10—H10C109.5
C4—C5—H5120.0H10A—C10—H10C109.5
C6—C5—H5120.0H10B—C10—H10C109.5
C5—C6—C1120.02 (13)C8—N1—C7124.86 (11)
C5—C6—C7120.04 (12)C8—N1—C9117.83 (12)
C1—C6—C7119.92 (12)C7—N1—C9117.31 (11)
O1—C7—N1119.92 (13)C8—N2—C1124.52 (11)
O1—C7—C6124.26 (13)C8—N2—H1111.4 (11)
N1—C7—C6115.81 (11)C1—N2—H1124.1 (11)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H1···O2i0.888 (19)2.011 (19)2.8931 (17)171.8 (17)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N2—H1⋯O2i0.888 (19)2.011 (19)2.8931 (17)171.8 (17)

Symmetry code: (i) .

  2 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Synthesis and insecticidal activities of novel anthranilic diamides containing modified N-pyridylpyrazoles.

Authors:  Qi Feng; Zhi-Li Liu; Li-Xia Xiong; Ming-Zhong Wang; Yong-Qiang Li; Zheng-Ming Li
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.279

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.