Literature DB >> 22090933

2-Amino-anilinium 2-carb-oxy-acetate.

Li-Ping Feng1, Liang Zhao.   

Abstract

In the crystal structure of the title compound, C(6)H(9)N(2) (+)·C(3)H(3)O(4) (-), all the amino H atoms are involved in inter-molecular N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds, which link the ions into double chains parallel to [101]. In the anion, an intra-molecular O-H⋯O hydrogen bond is observed.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22090933      PMCID: PMC3212276          DOI: 10.1107/S160053681102544X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For background to pharmaceutical applications and growth of co-crystals, see: Almarsson & Zaworotko (2004 ▶); Blagden et al. (2008 ▶); Vishweshwar et al. (2006 ▶); Kapildev et al. (2011 ▶); Schultheiss & Newman (2009 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C6H9N2 +·C3H3O4 M = 212.21 Monoclinic, a = 12.735 (3) Å b = 5.7448 (11) Å c = 14.429 (3) Å β = 107.38 (3)° V = 1007.4 (3) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.11 mm−1 T = 298 K 0.30 × 0.25 × 0.15 mm

Data collection

Rigaku Mercury2 diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005 ▶) T min = 0.910, T max = 1.000 10297 measured reflections 2310 independent reflections 2027 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.026

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.040 wR(F 2) = 0.129 S = 1.14 2310 reflections 137 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.29 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.25 e Å−3 Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL . Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681102544X/rz2617sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681102544X/rz2617Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681102544X/rz2617Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C6H9N2+·C3H3O4F(000) = 448
Mr = 212.21Dx = 1.399 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 2310 reflections
a = 12.735 (3) Åθ = 1.9–27.5°
b = 5.7448 (11) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
c = 14.429 (3) ÅT = 298 K
β = 107.38 (3)°Block, colourless
V = 1007.4 (3) Å30.30 × 0.25 × 0.15 mm
Z = 4
Rigaku Mercury2 diffractometer2310 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2027 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.026
Detector resolution: 13.6612 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 1.9°
CCD profile fitting scansh = −16→16
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)k = −7→7
Tmin = 0.910, Tmax = 1.000l = −18→18
10297 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.129H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.14w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0733P)2 + 0.1065P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2310 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
137 parametersΔρmax = 0.29 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.25 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O20.61965 (7)0.52957 (17)0.59590 (7)0.0380 (3)
N10.58132 (8)0.80154 (19)0.41942 (8)0.0318 (3)
H1A0.53360.83760.36230.048*
H1B0.59970.92970.45520.048*
H1C0.55060.69980.45000.048*
O40.78587 (8)0.72834 (17)0.69666 (7)0.0407 (3)
H40.72310.68620.66700.061*
O30.94464 (8)0.5435 (2)0.74114 (7)0.0458 (3)
O10.62897 (9)0.1692 (2)0.54632 (9)0.0538 (3)
C10.67983 (9)0.6987 (2)0.40414 (8)0.0286 (3)
C90.84796 (9)0.5516 (2)0.69323 (8)0.0303 (3)
C70.67270 (10)0.3478 (2)0.58610 (8)0.0320 (3)
C80.79755 (9)0.3559 (2)0.62487 (9)0.0307 (3)
H8A0.82260.21010.65800.037*
H8B0.82630.36410.56980.037*
C60.77981 (11)0.8061 (3)0.44260 (10)0.0390 (3)
H6A0.78450.94350.47770.047*
N20.56773 (12)0.3929 (3)0.31118 (11)0.0569 (4)
H2A0.56010.25180.28280.068*
H2B0.50780.42220.33030.068*
C20.66864 (11)0.4931 (2)0.35095 (9)0.0342 (3)
C30.76464 (13)0.3975 (3)0.33892 (10)0.0436 (4)
H3A0.76070.25960.30430.052*
C40.86492 (13)0.5041 (3)0.37757 (12)0.0515 (4)
H4A0.92770.43690.36880.062*
C50.87378 (12)0.7085 (3)0.42893 (12)0.0513 (4)
H5A0.94180.78040.45420.062*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O20.0268 (4)0.0449 (5)0.0408 (5)0.0064 (4)0.0079 (4)0.0038 (4)
N10.0269 (5)0.0348 (6)0.0329 (5)0.0024 (4)0.0074 (4)−0.0021 (4)
O40.0355 (5)0.0373 (5)0.0450 (5)0.0022 (4)0.0055 (4)−0.0112 (4)
O30.0282 (5)0.0568 (6)0.0444 (6)−0.0005 (4)−0.0012 (4)−0.0073 (5)
O10.0412 (6)0.0616 (7)0.0592 (7)−0.0177 (5)0.0160 (5)−0.0293 (6)
C10.0259 (6)0.0320 (6)0.0282 (6)0.0026 (4)0.0085 (4)0.0031 (4)
C90.0265 (6)0.0365 (6)0.0275 (6)−0.0006 (5)0.0075 (4)0.0004 (5)
C70.0277 (6)0.0421 (7)0.0262 (5)−0.0027 (5)0.0082 (4)−0.0023 (5)
C80.0274 (6)0.0325 (6)0.0324 (6)0.0012 (5)0.0092 (5)−0.0031 (5)
C60.0319 (6)0.0423 (7)0.0414 (7)−0.0037 (5)0.0088 (5)−0.0007 (6)
N20.0508 (8)0.0546 (8)0.0686 (9)−0.0159 (6)0.0229 (7)−0.0303 (7)
C20.0384 (7)0.0349 (7)0.0314 (6)0.0004 (5)0.0134 (5)0.0004 (5)
C30.0542 (9)0.0426 (8)0.0409 (7)0.0124 (7)0.0246 (6)0.0031 (6)
C40.0425 (8)0.0685 (11)0.0513 (9)0.0203 (7)0.0259 (7)0.0154 (8)
C50.0279 (7)0.0690 (11)0.0571 (9)−0.0014 (7)0.0128 (6)0.0069 (8)
O2—C71.2742 (16)C8—H8A0.9700
N1—C11.4618 (15)C8—H8B0.9700
N1—H1A0.8900C6—C51.388 (2)
N1—H1B0.8900C6—H6A0.9300
N1—H1C0.8900N2—C21.3679 (19)
O4—C91.2969 (16)N2—H2A0.9003
O4—H40.8221N2—H2B0.9008
O3—C91.2195 (15)C2—C31.3978 (19)
O1—C71.2253 (17)C3—C41.375 (2)
C1—C61.3737 (18)C3—H3A0.9300
C1—C21.3924 (18)C4—C51.375 (3)
C9—C81.5069 (17)C4—H4A0.9300
C7—C81.5205 (17)C5—H5A0.9300
C1—N1—H1A109.5C7—C8—H8B108.0
C1—N1—H1B109.5H8A—C8—H8B107.2
H1A—N1—H1B109.5C1—C6—C5119.72 (14)
C1—N1—H1C109.5C1—C6—H6A120.1
H1A—N1—H1C109.5C5—C6—H6A120.1
H1B—N1—H1C109.5C2—N2—H2A122.0
C9—O4—H4105.0C2—N2—H2B124.6
C6—C1—C2122.23 (12)H2A—N2—H2B108.7
C6—C1—N1119.42 (12)N2—C2—C1121.12 (12)
C2—C1—N1118.34 (11)N2—C2—C3121.96 (13)
O3—C9—O4122.15 (12)C1—C2—C3116.91 (13)
O3—C9—C8120.19 (12)C4—C3—C2121.01 (14)
O4—C9—C8117.62 (10)C4—C3—H3A119.5
O1—C7—O2123.81 (12)C2—C3—H3A119.5
O1—C7—C8118.48 (12)C5—C4—C3121.04 (13)
O2—C7—C8117.71 (11)C5—C4—H4A119.5
C9—C8—C7117.25 (10)C3—C4—H4A119.5
C9—C8—H8A108.0C4—C5—C6119.08 (14)
C7—C8—H8A108.0C4—C5—H5A120.5
C9—C8—H8B108.0C6—C5—H5A120.5
O3—C9—C8—C7165.75 (12)C6—C1—C2—C30.67 (19)
O4—C9—C8—C7−16.10 (16)N1—C1—C2—C3−179.06 (11)
O1—C7—C8—C9−165.98 (12)N2—C2—C3—C4178.41 (14)
O2—C7—C8—C914.93 (16)C1—C2—C3—C4−0.5 (2)
C2—C1—C6—C5−0.2 (2)C2—C3—C4—C5−0.2 (2)
N1—C1—C6—C5179.56 (12)C3—C4—C5—C60.8 (2)
C6—C1—C2—N2−178.23 (14)C1—C6—C5—C4−0.6 (2)
N1—C1—C2—N22.05 (19)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O3i0.891.902.7865 (17)171
N1—H1B···O1ii0.891.862.7420 (15)170
N2—H2A···O3iii0.902.212.9693 (18)142
N2—H2B···O2iv0.902.213.0988 (18)169
N1—H1C···O20.892.252.9019 (15)130
O4—H4···O20.821.672.4616 (15)161
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯O3i0.891.902.7865 (17)171
N1—H1B⋯O1ii0.891.862.7420 (15)170
N2—H2A⋯O3iii0.902.212.9693 (18)142
N2—H2B⋯O2iv0.902.213.0988 (18)169
N1—H1C⋯O20.892.252.9019 (15)130
O4—H4⋯O20.821.672.4616 (15)161

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) .

  5 in total

1.  Crystal engineering of the composition of pharmaceutical phases. Do pharmaceutical co-crystals represent a new path to improved medicines?

Authors:  Orn Almarsson; Michael J Zaworotko
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Unintended water mediated cocrystal formation in carbamazepine and aspirin tablets.

Authors:  Kapildev K Arora; Nitin G Tayade; Raj Suryanarayanan
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 4.  Pharmaceutical co-crystals.

Authors:  Peddy Vishweshwar; Jennifer A McMahon; Joanna A Bis; Michael J Zaworotko
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.534

5.  Pharmaceutical Cocrystals and Their Physicochemical Properties.

Authors:  Nate Schultheiss; Ann Newman
Journal:  Cryst Growth Des       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 4.076

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.