Literature DB >> 22090897

catena-Poly[[(3-methyl-pyridine)-copper(I)]-μ-cyanido-copper(I)-μ-cyanido].

Jin-Biao Cai1, Ting-Ting Chen, Ze-Ying Xie, Hong Deng.   

Abstract

In the title complex, [Cu(2)(CN)(2)(C(6)H(7)N)](n), there are two copper atoms with different coordination environments. One Cu atom (Cu1) is linked to the two cyanide ligands, one N atom from a pyridine ring while the other (Cu2) is coordinated by the two cyanide ligands in a slightly distorted tetra-hedral geometry and linked to Cu1, forming a triangular coordination environment. The Cu atoms are bridged by bidentate cyanide ligands, forming an infinite Cu-CN chain. One cyanide ligand is equally disordered over two sets of sites, exchanging C and N atoms coordinated to both metal atoms. However, one cyanide group is not disordered and it coordinates to Cu1 via the N atom whereas its C-atom counterpart coordinates Cu2. The 3-methyl-pyridine (3MP) ligand coordinates through the N atom to Cu1 as a terminal ligand, which originates from decyanation of 3-pyridyl-acetonitrile under hydro-thermal conditions. Adjacent Cu-CN chains are inter-connected through CuCu inter-actions [2.8364 (10) Å], forming a three-dimensional framework.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22090897      PMCID: PMC3212195          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811028509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For applications of coordination polymers, see: Gu & Xue (2007 ▶); Cheng et al. (2007 ▶); Ley et al. (2010 ▶); Etaiw et al. (2009 ▶); Li et al. (2009 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

[Cu2(CN)2(C6H7N)] M = 272.27 Monoclinic, a = 9.3027 (18) Å b = 12.090 (2) Å c = 8.8738 (17) Å β = 105.927 (2)° V = 959.7 (3) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 4.38 mm−1 T = 296 K 0.15 × 0.12 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEX CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2004 ▶) T min = 0.559, T max = 0.668 4802 measured reflections 1725 independent reflections 1396 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.035

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.042 wR(F 2) = 0.118 S = 1.03 1725 reflections 107 parameters 2 restraints H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.76 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.77 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2004 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2004 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811028509/kp2324sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811028509/kp2324Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[Cu2(CN)2(C6H7N)]F(000) = 536
Mr = 272.27Dx = 1.884 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 1725 reflections
a = 9.3027 (18) Åθ = 2.3–25.2°
b = 12.090 (2) ŵ = 4.38 mm1
c = 8.8738 (17) ÅT = 296 K
β = 105.927 (2)°Block, yellow
V = 959.7 (3) Å30.15 × 0.12 × 0.10 mm
Z = 4
Bruker SMART APEX CCD diffractometer1725 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1396 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.035
ω scansθmax = 25.2°, θmin = 2.3°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2004)h = −10→11
Tmin = 0.559, Tmax = 0.668k = −13→14
4802 measured reflectionsl = −10→10
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.042Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.118H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.03w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0603P)2 + 1.271P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1725 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
107 parametersΔρmax = 0.76 e Å3
2 restraintsΔρmin = −0.77 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
C10.3796 (8)0.8237 (6)−0.1465 (8)0.085 (2)
H1A0.48150.8216−0.08320.127*
H1B0.36950.8783−0.22730.127*
H1C0.35200.7525−0.19330.127*
C20.2797 (3)0.8529 (3)−0.0463 (4)0.0574 (13)
C30.1740 (4)0.7751 (2)−0.0325 (3)0.0514 (12)
H30.16770.7076−0.08430.062*
N10.0778 (3)0.7981 (2)0.0587 (3)0.0464 (9)
C40.0872 (3)0.8990 (2)0.1361 (4)0.0539 (12)
H40.02280.91440.19710.065*
C50.1929 (4)0.9768 (2)0.1222 (4)0.0705 (16)
H50.19921.04420.17400.085*
C60.2891 (4)0.9537 (3)0.0310 (5)0.0703 (16)
H60.35991.00570.02180.084*
C7−0.2726 (5)0.7996 (4)0.2481 (5)0.0447 (11)
C8−0.0191 (5)0.5420 (3)0.0191 (5)0.0479 (10)0.50
C9−0.4653 (6)0.9731 (5)0.4697 (6)0.0674 (14)0.50
Cu1−0.07682 (7)0.68136 (4)0.07839 (7)0.0473 (2)
Cu2−0.35513 (8)0.88478 (6)0.37450 (8)0.0680 (3)
N2−0.2093 (5)0.7508 (4)0.1768 (5)0.0576 (11)
N3−0.0191 (5)0.5420 (3)0.0191 (5)0.0479 (10)0.50
N4−0.4653 (6)0.9731 (5)0.4697 (6)0.0674 (14)0.50
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.069 (4)0.102 (5)0.097 (5)−0.027 (4)0.045 (4)−0.012 (4)
C20.052 (3)0.061 (3)0.058 (3)−0.013 (3)0.012 (3)−0.001 (3)
C30.057 (3)0.051 (3)0.050 (3)−0.010 (2)0.020 (2)−0.008 (2)
N10.056 (2)0.040 (2)0.047 (2)−0.0042 (18)0.0218 (18)−0.0066 (17)
C40.066 (3)0.040 (3)0.052 (3)0.010 (2)0.012 (2)−0.004 (2)
C50.071 (4)0.043 (3)0.089 (4)−0.005 (3)0.008 (3)−0.015 (3)
C60.066 (4)0.046 (3)0.093 (4)−0.017 (3)0.011 (3)0.000 (3)
C70.052 (3)0.038 (3)0.050 (2)0.0047 (19)0.025 (2)−0.0047 (19)
C80.059 (3)0.038 (2)0.057 (2)0.0056 (19)0.034 (2)−0.0012 (19)
C90.073 (3)0.069 (3)0.066 (3)0.026 (3)0.029 (3)−0.009 (3)
Cu10.0561 (4)0.0377 (4)0.0583 (4)0.0040 (2)0.0328 (3)−0.0070 (2)
Cu20.0727 (5)0.0675 (5)0.0772 (5)0.0212 (4)0.0429 (4)−0.0155 (4)
N20.067 (3)0.050 (3)0.068 (3)0.007 (2)0.038 (2)−0.008 (2)
N30.059 (3)0.038 (2)0.057 (2)0.0056 (19)0.034 (2)−0.0012 (19)
N40.073 (3)0.069 (3)0.066 (3)0.026 (3)0.029 (3)−0.009 (3)
C1—C21.493 (6)C5—H50.9300
C1—H1A0.9600C6—H60.9300
C1—H1B0.9600C7—N21.140 (5)
C1—H1C0.9600C7—Cu21.839 (4)
C2—C31.3900C8—N3i1.158 (8)
C2—C61.3900C8—C8i1.158 (8)
C3—N11.3900C8—Cu11.886 (4)
C3—H30.9300C9—N4ii1.150 (9)
N1—C41.3900C9—C9ii1.150 (9)
N1—Cu12.057 (2)C9—Cu21.838 (5)
C4—C51.3900Cu1—N21.891 (4)
C4—H40.9300Cu1—Cu2iii2.8364 (10)
C5—C61.3900Cu2—Cu1iv2.8364 (10)
C2—C1—H1A109.5C5—C6—C2120.0
C2—C1—H1B109.5C5—C6—H6120.0
H1A—C1—H1B109.5C2—C6—H6120.0
C2—C1—H1C109.5N2—C7—Cu2173.8 (5)
H1A—C1—H1C109.5N3i—C8—C8i0.0 (5)
H1B—C1—H1C109.5N3i—C8—Cu1178.1 (5)
C3—C2—C6120.0C8i—C8—Cu1178.1 (5)
C3—C2—C1117.6 (3)N4ii—C9—C9ii0.0 (5)
C6—C2—C1122.4 (3)N4ii—C9—Cu2178.9 (8)
C2—C3—N1120.0C9ii—C9—Cu2178.9 (8)
C2—C3—H3120.0C8—Cu1—N2142.80 (19)
N1—C3—H3120.0C8—Cu1—N1109.28 (15)
C4—N1—C3120.0N2—Cu1—N1107.10 (16)
C4—N1—Cu1120.73 (15)C8—Cu1—Cu2iii81.38 (15)
C3—N1—Cu1119.27 (15)N2—Cu1—Cu2iii79.83 (14)
N1—C4—C5120.0N1—Cu1—Cu2iii132.57 (9)
N1—C4—H4120.0C9—Cu2—C7169.9 (2)
C5—C4—H4120.0C9—Cu2—Cu1iv113.40 (17)
C6—C5—C4120.0C7—Cu2—Cu1iv76.72 (15)
C6—C5—H5120.0C7—N2—Cu1170.8 (5)
C4—C5—H5120.0
Table 1

Selected bond lengths (Å)

N1—Cu12.057 (2)
C7—Cu21.839 (4)
C8—Cu11.886 (4)
C9—Cu21.838 (5)
Cu1—N21.891 (4)
  3 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Reversible luminescent reaction of amines with copper(I) cyanide.

Authors:  Amanda N Ley; Lars E Dunaway; Timothy P Brewster; Matthew D Dembo; T David Harris; François Baril-Robert; Xiaobo Li; Howard H Patterson; Robert D Pike
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 6.222

3.  {Ln(III)[mu(5)-kappa(2),kappa(1),kappa(1),kappa(1),kappa(1)-1,2-(CO2)(2)C6H4][isonicotine][H2O]}(2)Cu(I) x X (Ln = Eu, Sm, Nd; X = ClO4-, Cl-): a new pillared-layer approach to heterobimetallic 3d-4f 3d-network solids.

Authors:  Jian-Wen Cheng; Shou-Tian Zheng; En Ma; Guo-Yu Yang
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 5.165

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Crystal structures of two mixed-valence copper cyanide complexes with N-methyl-ethylenedi-amine.

Authors:  Peter W R Corfield; Alexander Sabatino
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun       Date:  2017-01-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.