Literature DB >> 22090246

Foam pore size is a critical interface parameter of suction-based wound healing devices.

Yvonne I Heit1, Pouya Dastouri, Douglas L Helm, Giorgio Pietramaggiori, George Younan, Paolo Erba, Stefan Münster, Dennis P Orgill, Sandra S Scherer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Suction-based wound healing devices with open-pore foam interfaces are widely used to treat complex tissue defects. The impact of changes in physicochemical parameters of the wound interfaces has not been investigated.
METHODS: Full-thickness wounds in diabetic mice were treated with occlusive dressing or a suction device with a polyurethane foam interface varying in mean pore size diameter. Wound surface deformation on day 2 was measured on fixed tissues. Histologic cross-sections were analyzed for granulation tissue thickness (hematoxylin and eosin), myofibroblast density (α-smooth muscle actin), blood vessel density (platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1), and cell proliferation (Ki67) on day 7.
RESULTS: Polyurethane foam-induced wound surface deformation increased with polyurethane foam pore diameter: 15 percent (small pore size), 60 percent (medium pore size), and 150 percent (large pore size). The extent of wound strain correlated with granulation tissue thickness that increased 1.7-fold in small pore size foam-treated wounds, 2.5-fold in medium pore size foam-treated wounds, and 4.9-fold in large pore size foam-treated wounds (p < 0.05) compared with wounds treated with an occlusive dressing. All polyurethane foams increased the number of myofibroblasts over occlusive dressing, with maximal presence in large pore size foam-treated wounds compared with all other groups (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The pore size of the interface material of suction devices has a significant impact on the wound healing response. Larger pores increased wound surface strain, tissue growth, and transformation of contractile cells. Modification of the pore size is a powerful approach for meeting biological needs of specific wounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22090246     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182402c89

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  6 in total

Review 1.  Mechanoregulation of Angiogenesis in Wound Healing.

Authors:  Luca Lancerotto; Dennis P Orgill
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  A Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Cost-effectiveness of a Novel, Simple Modification to the Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System.

Authors:  Waleed K Albayati; Sarah Al Youha; Ali A Ali; Zainab Fakhra
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-08-25

3.  CASE REPORT Management of Periauricular and Auricular Necrotizing Wound From Brown Recluse Spider Bite Using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and Wound Interface Modulation.

Authors:  Mark Chariker; Rachel Ford; Erik Rasmussen; Elaine Schotter
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2012-06-07

4.  Physical, morphological, and wound healing properties of a polyurethane foam-film dressing.

Authors:  Seung Moon Lee; Il Kyu Park; Yong Soo Kim; Hyun Jung Kim; Hanlim Moon; Stefan Mueller; Young-Il Jeong
Journal:  Biomater Res       Date:  2016-06-04

Review 5.  Nanomaterial-Based Therapy for Wound Healing.

Authors:  Anamika Kushwaha; Lalit Goswami; Beom Soo Kim
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 6.  Insights into the Design of Polyurethane Dressings Suitable for the Stages of Skin Wound-Healing: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Maria Morales-González; Luis Eduardo Díaz; Carlos Dominguez-Paz; Manuel F Valero
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-24       Impact factor: 4.967

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.