Literature DB >> 22089822

Olfactory experience modifies semiochemical responses in a bark beetle predator.

Arnaud Costa1, John D Reeve.   

Abstract

A typical feature of forest insect pests is their tendency to undergo large fluctuations in abundance, which can jeopardize the persistence of their predaceous natural enemies. One strategy that these predators may adopt to cope with these fluctuations would be to respond to sensory cues for multiple prey species. Another possible adaptation to temporal variation in the prey community could involve the learning of prey cues and switching behavior. We conducted three experiments to investigate the ability of the generalist bark beetle predator Thanasimus dubius (F.) (Coleoptera: Cleridae) to respond to different prey signals and to investigate the effect of olfactory experience. We first conducted a field choice test and a wind tunnel experiment to examine the kairomonal response of individual predators toward prey pheromone components (frontalin, ipsenol, ipsdienol, sulcatol) along with the pine monoterpene α-pinene, which is a volatile compound from the host of the prey. We also presented semiochemically naive predators with two prey pheromone components, frontalin and ipsenol, alone or associated with a reward. Our results showed that T. dubius populations are composed of generalists that can respond to a broad range of kairomonal signals. Naive T. dubius also were more attracted to ipsenol following its association with a reward. This work constitutes the first evidence that the behavior of a predatory insect involved in bark beetle population dynamics is influenced by previous olfactory experience, and provides a potential explanation for the pattern of prey switching observed in field studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22089822     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-011-0027-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  14 in total

1.  Learning, odour preference and flower foraging in moths.

Authors:  John Paul Cunningham; Chris J Moore; Myron P Zalucki; Stuart A West
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  High light intensity: a critical factor in the wind-tunnel flight of two scarabs, the rose chafer and Japanese beetle.

Authors:  J J Heath; R N Williams; P L Phelan
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Insect predator-prey coevolution via enantiomeric specificity in a kairomone-pheromone system.

Authors:  T L Payne; J C Dickens; J V Richerson
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Flight and landing behavior ofTrypodendron lineatum (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in response to different semiochemicals.

Authors:  S M Salom; J A McLean
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 5.  Evolutionary biology of insect learning.

Authors:  Reuven Dukas
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 19.686

6.  Optimal Foraging and Predator-Prey Dynamics

Authors: 
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.570

7.  Aggregation pheromones in the ambrosia beetle Platypus flavicornis.

Authors:  J A Renwick
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1977-04

8.  Variation in semiochemical-mediated prey-predator interaction:Ips pini (Scolytidae) andThanasimus dubius (Cleridae).

Authors:  D A Herms; R A Haack; B D Ayres
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Response of the clerid predatorThanasimus dubius (F.) to bark beetle pheromones and tree volatiles in a wind tunnel.

Authors:  R F Mizell; J L Frazier; T E Nebeker
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Host specialization in habitat specialists and generalists.

Authors:  Didier Stilmant; Cécile Van Bellinghen; Thierry Hance; Guy Boivin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.