Literature DB >> 22089467

Proposed severity and response criteria for Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID3): results for categories of disease activity and response criteria in abatacept clinical trials.

Theodore Pincus1, Patricia Hines, Martin J Bergman, Yusuf Yazici, Lisa C Rosenblatt, Ross MacLean.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An index is needed to assess the status of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), as none of the existing measures are applicable to all individual patients. The 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) is the most specific and widely used index. Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID3) is an index containing only the 3 patient self-report core dataset measures, without a laboratory test or formal joint count, and with simple scoring. RAPID3 is correlated significantly with DAS28, but calculated in 5-10 seconds on a Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ), compared to 114 seconds for DAS28.
METHODS: DAS28 (0-10 scale) categories for high, moderate, and low activity, and remission (≤ 2.6, 2.6-3.2, 3.21-5.1, and > 5.1, respectively) and proposed RAPID3 (0-30 scale) categories for severity (0 ≤ 3, 3.1-6, 6.1-12, and > 12) were compared in patients taking abatacept and control-treated patients at the endpoint of the Abatacept in Inadequate Response to Methotrexate (AIM) and the Abatacept Trial in Treatment of Anti-TNF INadequate Responders (ATTAIN) clinical trials, using cross-tabulations and kappa statistics.
RESULTS: Overall, 92%-99% of patients classified as having high DAS28 activity had high or moderate RAPID3 severity, while 64%-83% in DAS28 remission had RAPID3 low severity or remission; 50%-82% of patients with good or poor EULAR responses had good or poor RAPID3 responses. Kappa values ranged from 0.25 to 0.48, and weighted kappas from 0.32 to 0.52, indicating fair to moderate agreement for the 2 indices.
CONCLUSION: Proposed RAPID3 severity and response categories yield comparable results to DAS28 and EULAR criteria in AIM and ATTAIN. DAS28 is more specific for clinical trials. RAPID3 does not preclude also scoring DAS28, and may be informative in the infrastructure of routine care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22089467     DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.110262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  10 in total

1.  Changes in Alcohol Use and Associations With Disease Activity, Health Status, and Mortality in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Joshua F Baker; Bryant R England; Ted R Mikuls; Jesse Y Hsu; Michael D George; Sofia Pedro; Harlan Sayles; Kaleb Michaud
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 4.794

2.  Minimal Clinically Important Improvement of Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Michael M Ward; Isabel Castrejon; Martin J Bergman; Maria I Alba; Lori C Guthrie; Theodore Pincus
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.666

3.  Impact of assessing patient-reported outcomes with mobile apps on patient-provider interaction.

Authors:  Yomei Shaw; Delphine S Courvoisier; Almut Scherer; Adrian Ciurea; Thomas Lehmann; Veronika K Jaeger; Ulrich A Walker; Axel Finckh
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2021-04

4.  Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity: a systematic review following COSMIN guidelines.

Authors:  Tim Pickles; Rhiannon Macefield; Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi; Claire Beecher; Mike Horton; Karl Bang Christensen; Rhiannon Phillips; David Gillespie; Ernest Choy
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2022-03

5.  Evaluating patient reported outcomes in routine practice of patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biological disease modifying anti rheumatic drugs (b-DMARDs).

Authors:  Niels W Boone; Patty Teeuwisse; Paul-Hugo van der Kuy; Rob Janknegt; Robert B M Landewé
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-08-28

6.  Reductions in disease activity in the AMPLE trial: clinical response by baseline disease duration.

Authors:  Michael Schiff; Michael E Weinblatt; Robert Valente; Gustavo Citera; Michael Maldonado; Elena Massarotti; Yusuf Yazici; Roy Fleischmann
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2016-04-19

7.  Systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for assessing disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Jos Hendrikx; Marieke J de Jonge; Jaap Fransen; Wietske Kievit; Piet Lcm van Riel
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2016-08-18

8.  Impact of certolizumab pegol on patient-reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis and correlation with clinical measures of disease activity.

Authors:  Janet Pope; Clifton O Bingham; Roy M Fleischmann; Maxime Dougados; Elena M Massarotti; Jürgen Wollenhaupt; Benjamin Duncan; Geoffroy Coteur; Michael E Weinblatt
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 5.156

9.  Comparative Effectiveness of Etanercept and Adalimumab in Patient Reported Outcomes and Injection-Related Tolerability.

Authors:  Iris Navarro-Millán; Lisa J Herrinton; Lang Chen; Leslie Harrold; Liyan Liu; Jeffrey R Curtis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A somatization comorbidity phenotype impacts response to therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: post-hoc results from the certolizumab pegol phase 4 PREDICT trial.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Curtis; Christopher Herrem; 'Matladi N Ndlovu; Cathy O'Brien; Yusuf Yazici
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 5.156

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.