OBJECTIVE: To explore the association of frailty according to questionnaire data (modified Fried criteria) with important endpoints in older men. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective cohort study (the Helsinki Businessmen Study) in Finland. PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS: In 1974, clinically healthy men (born 1919-1934, n=1815) of similar socioeconomic status were identified. After a 26-year follow-up in 2000 (mean age 73 years), disease prevalence, mobility-disability, and frailty status (80.9% of survivors, n=1125) were appraised using a postal questionnaire including RAND-36. Four criteria were used for definition: 1) >5% weight loss from midlife, or body mass index (BMI) <21 kg/m2; 2) reported physical inactivity; 3) low vitality (RAND-36); 4) physical weakness (RAND-36). Responders with 3-4, 1-2, and zero criteria were classified as frail (n=108), prefrail (n=567), and nonfrail (n=450), respectively. Eight-year mortality was assessed from registers, and in 2007, survivors were re-assessed with questionnaires. RESULTS: Nonfrail as referent and adjusted for age, BMI and smoking, both prefrail (HR 2.26; 95% CI, 1.57-3.26), and frail status (4.09; 95% CI, 2.60-6.44) were significant predictors of mortality. Nonfrailty predicted better survival independently of the frailty components, diseases, and disability, and also predicted faster walking speed and less disability 7 years later. CONCLUSIONS: Frailty, and also prefrailty, as defined using questionnaire data (RAND-36) independently predicted important endpoints in older men.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the association of frailty according to questionnaire data (modified Fried criteria) with important endpoints in older men. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective cohort study (the Helsinki Businessmen Study) in Finland. PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS: In 1974, clinically healthy men (born 1919-1934, n=1815) of similar socioeconomic status were identified. After a 26-year follow-up in 2000 (mean age 73 years), disease prevalence, mobility-disability, and frailty status (80.9% of survivors, n=1125) were appraised using a postal questionnaire including RAND-36. Four criteria were used for definition: 1) >5% weight loss from midlife, or body mass index (BMI) <21 kg/m2; 2) reported physical inactivity; 3) low vitality (RAND-36); 4) physical weakness (RAND-36). Responders with 3-4, 1-2, and zero criteria were classified as frail (n=108), prefrail (n=567), and nonfrail (n=450), respectively. Eight-year mortality was assessed from registers, and in 2007, survivors were re-assessed with questionnaires. RESULTS: Nonfrail as referent and adjusted for age, BMI and smoking, both prefrail (HR 2.26; 95% CI, 1.57-3.26), and frail status (4.09; 95% CI, 2.60-6.44) were significant predictors of mortality. Nonfrailty predicted better survival independently of the frailty components, diseases, and disability, and also predicted faster walking speed and less disability 7 years later. CONCLUSIONS: Frailty, and also prefrailty, as defined using questionnaire data (RAND-36) independently predicted important endpoints in older men.
Authors: Stuart G Parker; Dorothea Bechinger-English; Carol Jagger; Nicola Spiers; James Lindesay Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2006-04-25 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Howard Bergman; Luigi Ferrucci; Jack Guralnik; David B Hogan; Silvia Hummel; Sathya Karunananthan; Christina Wolfson Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: L P Fried; C M Tangen; J Walston; A B Newman; C Hirsch; J Gottdiener; T Seeman; R Tracy; W J Kop; G Burke; M A McBurnie Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Kenneth Rockwood; Susan E Howlett; Chris MacKnight; B Lynn Beattie; Howard Bergman; Réjean Hébert; David B Hogan; Christina Wolfson; Ian McDowell Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Patricia A Boyle; Aron S Buchman; Robert S Wilson; Sue E Leurgans; David A Bennett Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2010-01-08 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: G Abellan van Kan; Y Rolland; S Andrieu; J Bauer; O Beauchet; M Bonnefoy; M Cesari; L M Donini; S Gillette Guyonnet; M Inzitari; F Nourhashemi; G Onder; P Ritz; A Salva; M Visser; B Vellas Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Kari Luotola; Satu Jyväkorpi; Annele Urtamo; Kaisu H Pitkälä; Mika Kivimäki; Timo E Strandberg Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2020-02-27 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Timo E Strandberg; Linda Lindström; Satu Jyväkorpi; Annele Urtamo; Kaisu H Pitkälä; Mika Kivimäki Journal: Eur Geriatr Med Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 1.710