Literature DB >> 22088897

Attitudes of women in their forties toward the 2009 USPSTF mammogram guidelines: a randomized trial on the effects of media exposure.

AuTumn S Davidson1, Xun Liao, B Dale Magee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to assess women's attitudes toward 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force mammography screening guideline changes and evaluate the role of media in shaping opinions. STUDY
DESIGN: Two hundred forty-nine women, aged 39-49 years, presenting for annual examinations randomized to read 1 of 2 articles, and survey completion comprised the design of the study.
RESULTS: Eighty-eight percent overestimated the lifetime breast cancer (BrCa) risk. Eighty-nine percent want yearly mammograms in their 40s. Eighty-six percent felt the changes were unsafe, and even if the changes were doctor recommended, 84% would not delay screening until age 50 years. Those with a friend/relative with BrCa were more likely to want annual mammography in their forties (92% vs 77%, P = .001), and feel changes unsafe (91% vs 69%, P ≤ .0001). Participants with previous false-positive mammograms were less likely to accept doctor-recommended screening delay until age 50 years (8% vs 21%, P = .01).
CONCLUSION: Women overestimate BrCa risk. Skepticism of new mammogram guidelines exists, and is increased by exposure to negative media. Those with prior false-positive mammograms are less likely to accept changes.
Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22088897     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  12 in total

1.  Exploring Explanatory Models of Risk in Breast Cancer Risk Counseling Discussions: NSABP/NRG Oncology Decision-Making Project 1.

Authors:  Christine M Gunn; Barbara Bokhour; Victoria A Parker; Patricia A Parker; Sarah Blakeslee; Hanna Bandos; Christine Holmberg
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2019 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 2.592

2.  Beyond the mammography debate: a moderate perspective.

Authors:  C Kaniklidis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Mammography use among women ages 40-49 after the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation.

Authors:  Lauren D Block; Marian P Jarlenski; Albert W Wu; Wendy L Bennett
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Effects of Media Exposure to Conflicting Information About Mammography: Results From a Population-based Survey Experiment.

Authors:  Rebekah H Nagler; Marco C Yzer; Alexander J Rothman
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2019-08-29

5.  Women's responses to changes in U.S. Preventive Task Force's mammography screening guidelines: results of focus groups with ethnically diverse women.

Authors:  Jennifer D Allen; Shirley Morrison Bluethmann; Margaret Sheets; Kelly Morrison Opdyke; Kathryn Gates-Ferris; Marc Hurlbert; Elizabeth Harden
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Using mammograms to predict preventive health services behavior and mortality in women.

Authors:  Bilikisu Elewonibi; Patricia Y Miranda
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2016-10-26

7.  Breast cancer policy in Latin America: account of achievements and challenges in five countries.

Authors:  Gustavo Nigenda; Maria Cecilia Gonzalez-Robledo; Luz Maria Gonzalez-Robledo; Rosa Maria Bejarano-Arias
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.185

8.  Facilitating informed decisions about breast cancer screening: development and evaluation of a web-based decision aid for women in their 40s.

Authors:  Elena B Elkin; Valerie H Pocus; Alvin I Mushlin; Tessa Cigler; Coral L Atoria; Margaret M Polaneczky
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  "The ultimate decision is yours": exploring patients' attitudes about the overuse of medical interventions.

Authors:  David Schleifer; David J Rothman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Awareness of and reactions to mammography controversy among immigrant women.

Authors:  Rebekah H Nagler; Jennifer A Lueck; Lauren S Gray
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.