Literature DB >> 22088045

Communication: limitations of the stochastic quasi-steady-state approximation in open biochemical reaction networks.

Philipp Thomas1, Arthur V Straube, Ramon Grima.   

Abstract

It is commonly believed that, whenever timescale separation holds, the predictions of reduced chemical master equations obtained using the stochastic quasi-steady-state approximation are in very good agreement with the predictions of the full master equations. We use the linear noise approximation to obtain a simple formula for the relative error between the predictions of the two master equations for the Michaelis-Menten reaction with substrate input. The reduced approach is predicted to overestimate the variance of the substrate concentration fluctuations by as much as 30%. The theoretical results are validated by stochastic simulations using experimental parameter values for enzymes involved in proteolysis, gluconeogenesis, and fermentation.
© 2011 American Institute of Physics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22088045     DOI: 10.1063/1.3661156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  22 in total

1.  Note: Parameter-independent bounding of the stochastic Michaelis-Menten steady-state intrinsic noise variance.

Authors:  L A Widmer; J Stelling; F J Doyle
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Adaptive deployment of model reductions for tau-leaping simulation.

Authors:  Sheng Wu; Jin Fu; Linda R Petzold
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Accuracy of the Michaelis-Menten approximation when analysing effects of molecular noise.

Authors:  Michael J Lawson; Linda Petzold; Andreas Hellander
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Quantifying Dynamic Regulation in Metabolic Pathways with Nonparametric Flux Inference.

Authors:  Fei He; Michael P H Stumpf
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  GillesPy: A Python Package for Stochastic Model Building and Simulation.

Authors:  John H Abel; Brian Drawert; Andreas Hellander; Linda R Petzold
Journal:  IEEE Life Sci Lett       Date:  2016-09

6.  On the precision of quasi steady state assumptions in stochastic dynamics.

Authors:  Animesh Agarwal; Rhys Adams; Gastone C Castellani; Harel Z Shouval
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  The validity of quasi-steady-state approximations in discrete stochastic simulations.

Authors:  Jae Kyoung Kim; Krešimir Josić; Matthew R Bennett
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Late-Arriving Signals Contribute Less to Cell-Fate Decisions.

Authors:  Michael G Cortes; Jimmy T Trinh; Lanying Zeng; Gábor Balázsi
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Revisiting the Reduction of Stochastic Models of Genetic Feedback Loops with Fast Promoter Switching.

Authors:  James Holehouse; Ramon Grima
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  A multi-time-scale analysis of chemical reaction networks: II. Stochastic systems.

Authors:  Xingye Kan; Chang Hyeong Lee; Hans G Othmer
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 2.259

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.