Literature DB >> 22087937

Source level reduction and sonar beam aiming in landing big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus).

Jens C Koblitz1, Peter Stilz, Wiebke Pflästerer, Mariana L Melcón, Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler.   

Abstract

Reduction of echolocation call source levels in bats has previously been studied using set-ups with one microphone. By using a 16 microphone array, sound pressure level (SPL) variations, possibly caused by the scanning movements of the bat, can be excluded and the sonar beam aiming can be studied. During the last two meters of approach flights to a landing platform in a large flight room, five big brown bats aimed sonar beams at the landing site and reduced the source level on average by 7 dB per halving of distance. Considerable variation was found among the five individuals in the amount of source level reduction ranging from 4 to 9 dB per halving of distance. These results are discussed with respect to automatic gain control and intensity compensation and the combination of the two effects. It is argued that the two effects together do not lead to a stable echo level at the cochlea. This excludes a tightly coupled closed loop feed back control system as an explanation for the observed reduction of signal SPL in landing big brown bats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22087937     DOI: 10.1121/1.3628345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Echo feedback mediates noise-induced vocal modifications in flying bats.

Authors:  Jinhong Luo; Manman Lu; Jie Luo; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 2.389

2.  Echolocating bats rely on an innate speed-of-sound reference.

Authors:  Eran Amichai; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Bats pre-adapt sensory acquisition according to target distance prior to takeoff even in the presence of closer background objects.

Authors:  Eran Amichai; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Hunting bats adjust their echolocation to receive weak prey echoes for clutter reduction.

Authors:  Laura Stidsholt; Stefan Greif; Holger R Goerlitz; Kristian Beedholm; Jamie Macaulay; Mark Johnson; Peter Teglberg Madsen
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 14.136

5.  Scanning behavior in echolocating common pipistrelle bats (Pipistrellus pipistrellus).

Authors:  Anna-Maria Seibert; Jens C Koblitz; Annette Denzinger; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Intensity and directionality of bat echolocation signals.

Authors:  Lasse Jakobsen; Signe Brinkløv; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Acoustic behavior of melon-headed whales varies on a diel cycle.

Authors:  Simone Baumann-Pickering; Marie A Roch; Sean M Wiggins; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler; John A Hildebrand
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  How Nectar-Feeding Bats Localize their Food: Echolocation Behavior of Leptonycteris yerbabuenae Approaching Cactus Flowers.

Authors:  Tania P Gonzalez-Terrazas; Jens C Koblitz; Theodore H Fleming; Rodrigo A Medellín; Elisabeth K V Kalko; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler; Marco Tschapka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Reduction of emission level in approach signals of greater mouse-eared bats (Myotis myotis): No evidence for a closed loop control system for intensity compensation.

Authors:  Tobias Budenz; Annette Denzinger; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.