BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:Bortezomib, an antineoplastic agent with proteasome inhibitory activity, is extensively metabolized by the hepatic microsomal cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes CYP3A4 and CYP2C19. Drugs that affect these enzymes may therefore have an impact on the pharmacological profile of bortezomib. This study evaluated the effects of co-administration of a potent CYP3A4 inducer (rifampicin [rifampin]) and a weak CYP3A4 inducer (dexamethasone) on the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety profiles of bortezomib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receivedintravenous bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2, administered on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of a 21-day cycle, for 3 cycles. In stage 1, patients were randomized (1 : 1) to receive bortezomib alone or in combination with oral rifampicin 600 mg once daily on days 4-10 during cycle 3 only. If the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of bortezomib was reduced by ≥30% during rifampicin co-administration, then stage 2 was initiated, in which patients received bortezomib with dexamethasone 40 mg once daily on days 1-4 and days 9-12 during cycle 3 only. Blood samples were collected on days 11 through 14 of cycles 2 and 3 before and after bortezomib administration, at prespecified time points, for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (proteasome inhibition) assessments. RESULTS:Twelve patients in the bortezomib-alone arm, six patients in thebortezomib plus rifampicin arm and seven patients in the bortezomib plus dexamethasone arm were included in the pharmacokinetics-evaluable set. Rifampicin reduced the mean AUC from 0 to 72 hours (AUC(72h)) of bortezomib by approximately 45% (223 ng · h/mL in cycle 2 vs 123 ng · h/mL in cycle 3), while dexamethasone had no effect (mean AUC(72h): 179 ng · h/mL in cycle 2 vs 170 ng · h/mL in cycle 3). Proteasome inhibition parameters in peripheral blood were unaffected by rifampicin or dexamethasone. Safety profiles were similar across the treatment arms and consistent with previous experience of bortezomib. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, co-administration of rifampicin decreased the exposure to bortezomib but did not affect the proteasome inhibition or safety profiles; co-administration of dexamethasone did not affect the exposure to bortezomib, proteasome inhibition or safety profiles. Concomitant administration of bortezomib with strong CYP3A4 inducers such as rifampicin is not recommended, as it may result in a reduction of the clinical effect, whereas concomitant administration of weak CYP3A4 inducers such as dexamethasone does not affect the pharmacological profile of bortezomib.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:Bortezomib, an antineoplastic agent with proteasome inhibitory activity, is extensively metabolized by the hepatic microsomal cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes CYP3A4 and CYP2C19. Drugs that affect these enzymes may therefore have an impact on the pharmacological profile of bortezomib. This study evaluated the effects of co-administration of a potent CYP3A4 inducer (rifampicin [rifampin]) and a weak CYP3A4 inducer (dexamethasone) on the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety profiles of bortezomib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma received intravenous bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2, administered on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of a 21-day cycle, for 3 cycles. In stage 1, patients were randomized (1 : 1) to receive bortezomib alone or in combination with oral rifampicin 600 mg once daily on days 4-10 during cycle 3 only. If the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of bortezomib was reduced by ≥30% during rifampicin co-administration, then stage 2 was initiated, in which patients received bortezomib with dexamethasone 40 mg once daily on days 1-4 and days 9-12 during cycle 3 only. Blood samples were collected on days 11 through 14 of cycles 2 and 3 before and after bortezomib administration, at prespecified time points, for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (proteasome inhibition) assessments. RESULTS: Twelve patients in the bortezomib-alone arm, six patients in the bortezomib plus rifampicin arm and seven patients in the bortezomib plus dexamethasone arm were included in the pharmacokinetics-evaluable set. Rifampicin reduced the mean AUC from 0 to 72 hours (AUC(72h)) of bortezomib by approximately 45% (223 ng · h/mL in cycle 2 vs 123 ng · h/mL in cycle 3), while dexamethasone had no effect (mean AUC(72h): 179 ng · h/mL in cycle 2 vs 170 ng · h/mL in cycle 3). Proteasome inhibition parameters in peripheral blood were unaffected by rifampicin or dexamethasone. Safety profiles were similar across the treatment arms and consistent with previous experience of bortezomib. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, co-administration of rifampicin decreased the exposure to bortezomib but did not affect the proteasome inhibition or safety profiles; co-administration of dexamethasone did not affect the exposure to bortezomib, proteasome inhibition or safety profiles. Concomitant administration of bortezomib with strong CYP3A4 inducers such as rifampicin is not recommended, as it may result in a reduction of the clinical effect, whereas concomitant administration of weak CYP3A4 inducers such as dexamethasone does not affect the pharmacological profile of bortezomib.
Authors: B D Cheson; S J Horning; B Coiffier; M A Shipp; R I Fisher; J M Connors; T A Lister; J Vose; A Grillo-López; A Hagenbeek; F Cabanillas; D Klippensten; W Hiddemann; R Castellino; N L Harris; J O Armitage; W Carter; R Hoppe; G P Canellos Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Surasak Phuphanich; Jeffrey G Supko; Kathryn A Carson; Stuart A Grossman; L Burt Nabors; Tom Mikkelsen; Glenn Lesser; Steve Rosenfeld; Serena Desideri; Jeffrey J Olson Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2010-03-08 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Michel Delforge; Joan Bladé; Meletios A Dimopoulos; Thierry Facon; Martin Kropff; Heinz Ludwig; Antonio Palumbo; Philip Van Damme; Jesús F San-Miguel; Pieter Sonneveld Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Martin H Kropff; Guido Bisping; Doris Wenning; Sarah Volpert; Joëlle Tchinda; Wolfgang E Berdel; Joachim Kienast Journal: Leuk Res Date: 2005-01-15 Impact factor: 3.156
Authors: Sven de Vos; André Goy; Shaker R Dakhil; Mansoor N Saleh; Peter McLaughlin; Robert Belt; Christopher R Flowers; Mark Knapp; Lowell Hart; Dipti Patel-Donnelly; Martha Glenn; Stephanie A Gregory; Charles Holladay; Tracy Zhang; Anthony L Boral Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-09-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Nassr Nassr; Andreas Huennemeyer; Rolf Herzog; Oliver von Richter; Robert Hermann; Manuela Koch; Kevin Duffy; Karl Zech; Gezim Lahu Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: S Jagannath; B Barlogie; J Berenson; D Siegel; D Irwin; P G Richardson; R Niesvizky; R Alexanian; S A Limentani; M Alsina; J Adams; M Kauffman; D-L Esseltine; D P Schenkein; K C Anderson Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: G R Tundo; D Sbardella; A M Santoro; A Coletta; F Oddone; G Grasso; D Milardi; P M Lacal; S Marini; R Purrello; G Graziani; M Coletta Journal: Pharmacol Ther Date: 2020-05-19 Impact factor: 12.310
Authors: Philippe Moreau; Ievgenii I Karamanesht; Natalia Domnikova; Maryna Y Kyselyova; Kateryna V Vilchevska; Vadim A Doronin; Alexander Schmidt; Cyrille Hulin; Xavier Leleu; Dixie-Lee Esseltine; Karthik Venkatakrishnan; Donna Skee; Huaibao Feng; Suzette Girgis; Andrew Cakana; Helgi van de Velde; William Deraedt; Thierry Facon Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Mrinal M Gounder; Lakshmi Nayak; Solmaz Sahebjam; Alona Muzikansky; Armando J Sanchez; Serena Desideri; Xiaobu Ye; S Percy Ivy; L Burt Nabors; Michael Prados; Stuart Grossman; Lisa M DeAngelis; Patrick Y Wen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-08-17 Impact factor: 44.544