Literature DB >> 22087661

Intact proteome fractionation strategies compatible with mass spectrometry.

Alan A Doucette1, John C Tran, Mark J Wall, Shayla Fitzsimmons.   

Abstract

Proteome fractionation refers to separation at the level of intact proteins. Proteome fractionation may precede sample digestion and subsequent peptide-level separation and detection (i.e., bottom-up mass spectrometry [MS]). For top-down MS, proteome fractionation acts as a stand-alone separation platform, since intact proteins are directly analyzed by the mass spectrometer. Regardless of the MS identification strategy, separation of intact proteins has clear benefits as a result of decreasing sample complexity. However, this stage of the workflow also creates considerable challenges, which are generally absent from the counterpart peptide separation experiment. For example, maintaining protein solubility is a key concern before, during and after separation. To this end, surfactants such as sodium dodecyl sulfate may be employed during fractionation, so long as they are eliminated prior to MS. In this article, current strategies for proteome fractionation in a MS-compatible format are reviewed, illustrating the challenges and outlooks on this important aspect of proteomics.
© 2011 Expert Reviews Ltd

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22087661     DOI: 10.1586/epr.11.67

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics        ISSN: 1478-9450            Impact factor:   3.940


  19 in total

1.  Online matrix removal platform for coupling gel-based separations to whole protein electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Ki Hun Kim; Philip D Compton; John C Tran; Neil L Kelleher
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 4.466

2.  Top-Down Proteomics of Large Proteins up to 223 kDa Enabled by Serial Size Exclusion Chromatography Strategy.

Authors:  Wenxuan Cai; Trisha Tucholski; Bifan Chen; Andrew J Alpert; Sean McIlwain; Takushi Kohmoto; Song Jin; Ying Ge
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 3.  Top-down proteomics in health and disease: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Zachery R Gregorich; Ying Ge
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.984

4.  Online Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry for Top-Down Proteomics.

Authors:  Bifan Chen; Ying Peng; Santosh G Valeja; Lichen Xiu; Andrew J Alpert; Ying Ge
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Ultrahigh pressure fast size exclusion chromatography for top-down proteomics.

Authors:  Xin Chen; Ying Ge
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 3.984

6.  Three dimensional liquid chromatography coupling ion exchange chromatography/hydrophobic interaction chromatography/reverse phase chromatography for effective protein separation in top-down proteomics.

Authors:  Santosh G Valeja; Lichen Xiu; Zachery R Gregorich; Huseyin Guner; Song Jin; Ying Ge
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 7.  Identification and Quantification of Proteoforms by Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Leah V Schaffer; Robert J Millikin; Rachel M Miller; Lissa C Anderson; Ryan T Fellers; Ying Ge; Neil L Kelleher; Richard D LeDuc; Xiaowen Liu; Samuel H Payne; Liangliang Sun; Paul M Thomas; Trisha Tucholski; Zhe Wang; Si Wu; Zhijie Wu; Dahang Yu; Michael R Shortreed; Lloyd M Smith
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 8.  Top-down Proteomics: Technology Advancements and Applications to Heart Diseases.

Authors:  Wenxuan Cai; Trisha M Tucholski; Zachery R Gregorich; Ying Ge
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.940

Review 9.  Analysis of protein isoforms: can we do it better?

Authors:  Miroslava Stastna; Jennifer E Van Eyk
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 10.  Top-Down Proteomics: Ready for Prime Time?

Authors:  Bifan Chen; Kyle A Brown; Ziqing Lin; Ying Ge
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 6.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.