Literature DB >> 22087417

Secondary closure of an extraction socket using the double-membrane guided bone regeneration technique with immediate implant placement.

Jeong-Ho Yun1, Choong Man Jun, Nam-Sik Oh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Immediate implantation presents challenges regarding site healing, osseointegration, and obtaining complete soft-tissue coverage of the extraction socket, especially in the posterior area. This last issue is addressed herein using the double-membrane (collagen membrane+high-density polytetrafluoroethylene [dPTFE] membrane) technique in two clinical cases of posterior immediate implant placement.
METHODS: An implant was placed immediately after atraumatically extracting the maxillary posterior tooth. The gap between the coronal portion of the fixture and the adjacent bony walls was filled with allograft material. In addition, a collagen membrane (lower) and dPTFE membrane (upper) were placed in a layer-by-layer manner to enable the closure of the extraction socket without a primary flap closure, thus facilitating the preservation of keratinized mucosa. The upper dPTFE membrane was left exposed for 4 weeks, after which the membrane was gently removed using forceps without flap elevation.
RESULTS: There was considerable plaque deposition on the outer surface of the dPTFE membrane but not on the inner surface. Moreover, scanning electron microscopy of the removed membrane revealed only a small amount of bacteria on the inner surface of the membrane. The peri-implant tissue was favorable both clinically and radiographically after a conventional dental-implant healing period.
CONCLUSIONS: Secondary closure of the extraction socket and immediate guided bone regeneration using the double-membrane technique may produce a good clinical outcome after immediate placement of a dental implant in the posterior area.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone regeneration; Dental implantation; Tooth socket

Year:  2011        PMID: 22087417      PMCID: PMC3213237          DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2011.41.5.253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci        ISSN: 2093-2278            Impact factor:   2.614


  21 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of porous and non-porous teflon membranes plus a xenograft in the treatment of vertical osseous defects: a clinical reentry study.

Authors:  Stephen P Walters; Henry Greenwell; Margaret Hill; Connie Drisko; Kim Pickman; James P Scheetz
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.993

2.  Evaluation of a high-density polytetrafluoroethylene (n-PTFE) membrane as a barrier material to facilitate guided bone regeneration in the rat mandible.

Authors:  B K Bartee; J A Carr
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Healing of dehiscence-type defects in implants placed together with different barrier membranes: a comparative clinical study.

Authors:  Ofer Moses; Sandu Pitaru; Zvi Artzi; Carlos E Nemcovsky
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  Rationale for socket preservation after extraction of a single-rooted tooth when planning for future implant placement.

Authors:  Tassos Irinakis
Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.316

5.  Soft and hard tissue assessment of immediate implant placement: a case series.

Authors:  Gintaras Juodzbalys; Hom-Lay Wang
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.977

6.  Immediate transmucosal implants using the principle of guided tissue regeneration (II). A cross-sectional study comparing the clinical outcome 1 year after immediate to standard implant placement.

Authors:  U Brägger; C H Hämmerle; N P Lang
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.977

7.  The use of high-density polytetrafluoroethylene membrane to treat osseous defects: clinical reports.

Authors:  B K Bartee
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.454

8.  Guided tissue regeneration: comparison of bioabsorbable and non-bioabsorbable membranes. Histologic and histometric study in dogs.

Authors:  R G Caffesse; C E Nasjleti; E C Morrison; R Sanchez
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 6.993

9.  Preservation of alveolar bone in extraction sockets using bioabsorbable membranes.

Authors:  V Lekovic; P M Camargo; P R Klokkevold; M Weinlaender; E B Kenney; B Dimitrijevic; M Nedic
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.993

10.  Using a dense PTFE membrane without primary closure to achieve bone and tissue regeneration.

Authors:  H Dexter Barber; John Lignelli; Brian M Smith; Barry K Bartee
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.895

View more
  2 in total

1.  Vertical Guided Bone Regeneration using Titanium-reinforced d-PTFE Membrane and Prehydrated Corticocancellous Bone Graft.

Authors:  Alessandro Cucchi; Paolo Ghensi
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2014-11-14

2.  Bacterial Growth on Three Non-Resorbable Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) Membranes-An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Helena Zelikman; Gil Slutzkey; Ofir Rosner; Shifra Levartovsky; Shlomo Matalon; Ilan Beitlitum
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 3.748

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.