| Literature DB >> 22087153 |
Pipat Luksamijarulkul1, Pittaya Piroonamornpun, Somporn Kantharadussadee Triamchaisri.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Married couples constitute a target group for reducing the risk of infections with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV).Entities:
Keywords: HCV antibodies; Risk behaviors; Sex; Spouses
Year: 2011 PMID: 22087153 PMCID: PMC3206700
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hepat Mon ISSN: 1735-143X Impact factor: 0.660
Sociodemographic characteristics of study couples (No. = 114 couples)
| 2 (1.75) | 19 (16.7) | < 0.001 | |
| 66 (57.9) | 81 (71.1) | ||
| 46 (40.4) | 14 (12.3) | ||
| 28.2 ± 6.2 | 22.1±5.9 | ||
| 39 (34.2) | 54 (47.4) | 0.109 | |
| 45 (39.5) | 39 (34.2) | ||
| 30 (26.3) | 21 (18.4) | ||
| 4 (3.5) | 2 (1.8) | < 0.001 | |
| 21 (18.4) | 18 (15.8) | ||
| 48 (42.1) | 40 (35.2) | ||
| 39 (34.2) | 26 (22.8) | ||
| 2 (1.8) | 28 (24.6) | ||
| 33 (28.9) | 70 (61.4) | < 0.001 | |
| 56 (49.1) | 27 (23.6) | ||
| 20 (17.5) | 17 (14.9) | ||
a Statistical significance at α = 0.05
Risk behaviors toward HBV and HCV infection among study couples
| 6 (5.3) | 8 (7.0) | |
| 12 (10.5) | 8 (7.0) | |
| 21 (18.4) | 5 (4.4) | |
| 1 (0.9) | 0 (0.0) | |
| 21 (18.4) | 4 (3.5) | |
| 9 (7.9) | 1 (0.9) | |
| 24 (21.1) | 3 (2.6) | |
| 5 (4.4) | 3 (2.6) | |
| 0.018 |
a Statistical significance at α = 0.05
Prevalence of HBV seromarkers and anti-HCV among study couples
| 114 | 12 (10.5) | 31 (27.2) | 18 (15.8) | 61 (53.5) | 2 (1.8) | |
| 114 | 6 (5.3) | 27 (23.7) | 20 (17.5) | 53 (46.5) | 1 (0.9) | |
| 228 | 18 (7.9) | 58 (25.4) | 38 (16.7) | 114 (50.0) | 3 (1.3) | |
a p-value from x(2)-test = 0.354
b One had regular alcohol consumption and a history of extramarital sex without a condom, and the other had a history of intravenous drug use.
c Had a history of sexual contact before marriage and no history of other risk behaviors
Characteristics of 18 HBsAg-positive subjects and HBV seromarker status in their spouses
| < 1:80 | Female | 32 | Negative | |
| < 1:80 | Female | 59 | Anti-HBs + Anti-HBc | |
| 1:80 | Male | 30 | Anti-HBs + Anti-HBc | |
| 1:80 | Female | 51 | Anti-HBs + Anti-HBc | |
| 1:80 | Female | 36 | Negative | |
| 1:80 | Male | 37 | Negative | |
| 1:320 | Male | 12 | Anti-HBc only | |
| 1:320 | Male | 18 | Anti-HBs + Anti-HBc | |
| 1:640 | Male | 41 | Anti-HBs + Anti-HBc | |
| 1:640 | Male | 52 | Anti-HBs + Anti-HBc | |
| 1:640 | Male | 52 | Anti-HBs + Anti-HBc | |
| 1:1280 | Female | 60 | HBsAg + Anti-HBc | |
| 1:1280 | Male | 24 | Anti-HBc only | |
| 1:2560 | Female | 48 | Anti-HBc only | |
| 1:2560 | Male | 59 | Anti-HBc only | |
| 1:5120 | Male | 48 | Anti-HBs + Anti-HBc | |
| 1:5120 | Male | 60 | HBsAg + Anti-HBc | |
| 1:10240 | Male | 54 | Anti-HBc only |
a Both husband and wife were positive for HBsAg and anti-HBc