Literature DB >> 22087030

Evaluation of two devices for point-of-care testing of haemoglobin in neonatal pigs.

Annette P N Kutter1, Jacqueline Y Mauch, Barbara Riond, Olga Martin-Jurado, Nelly Spielmann, Markus Weiss, Regula Bettschart-Wolfensberger.   

Abstract

In veterinary medicine, point-of-care testing (POCT) techniques have become popular, since they provide immediate results and only small amounts of blood are needed. However, their accuracy is controversial. Pigs are often used for research purposes and accurate measurement of haemoglobin (Hb) is important during invasive procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate two different Hb POCT devices in neonatal pigs. A prospective study with 57 pigs of 3-6 weeks of age, weighing 4.1-6.2 kg (median 5.1 kg) was performed. Fifty-seven blood samples were analysed for Hb using a conductivity-based and a photometrical POCT device and compared with a photometrical reference method. Statistical analysis was performed with Bland-Altman analysis, Spearman correlation and Passing-Bablok regression analysis. Hb values ranged from 32 to 108 g/L (median 80 g/L) using the reference method. The bias of the photometrical method (HemoCue(®)) to the reference method was -1 g/L, with limits of agreement (LOA) of -7 to 6 g/L. The conductivity-based method (i-STAT(®)) had a bias of -15 g/L with LOA from -24 to -6 g/L. There was a significant association between protein values and the bias of i-STAT versus CellDyn (r(2) = 0.27, P < 0.05) but not with the bias of HemoCue versus CellDyn (r(2) = 0.001, P = 0.79). The lower the protein values were, the lower the Hb values were measured by the i-STAT. The conductivity-based measurement of Hb constantly underestimated Hb values, whereas the photometrical method demonstrated a better accuracy and is therefore more reliable for on-site measurement of Hb in pigs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22087030     DOI: 10.1258/la.2011.011086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Anim        ISSN: 0023-6772            Impact factor:   2.471


  3 in total

1.  Engineering a simple lateral flow device for animal blood coagulation monitoring.

Authors:  Hua Li; Daewoo Han; Giovanni M Pauletti; Andrew J Steckl
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Calibration of the HemoCue point-of-care analyser for determining haemoglobin concentration in a lizard and a fish.

Authors:  Sarah J Andrewartha; Suzanne L Munns; Ashley Edwards
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 3.079

3.  Blood parameters as biomarkers in a Salmonella spp. disease model of weaning piglets.

Authors:  Emili Barba-Vidal; Victor Fernando Buttow Roll; Edgar Garcia Manzanilla; Carlos Torrente; José Antonio Moreno Muñoz; José Francisco Pérez; Susana María Martín-Orúe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.