Literature DB >> 22085738

On the meaning and estimation of plasmid transfer rates for surface-associated and well-mixed bacterial populations.

Xue Zhong1, Jason Droesch, Randal Fox, Eva M Top, Stephen M Krone.   

Abstract

Conjugative plasmid transfer is key to the ability of bacteria to rapidly adapt to new environments, but there is no agreement on a single quantitative measure of the rate of plasmid transfer. Some studies derive estimates of transfer rates from mass-action differential equation models of plasmid population biology. The often-used 'endpoint method' is such an example. Others report measures of plasmid transfer efficiency that simply represent ratios of plasmid-bearing and plasmid-free cell densities and do not correspond to parameters in any mathematical model. Unfortunately, these quantities do not measure the same thing - sometimes differing by orders of magnitude - and their use is often clouded by a lack of specificity. Moreover, they do not distinguish between bulk transfer rates that are only relevant in well-mixed populations and the 'intrinsic' rates between individual cells. This leads to problems for surface-associated populations, which are not well-mixed but spatially structured. We used simulations of a spatially explicit mathematical model to evaluate the effectiveness of these various plasmid transfer efficiency measures when they are applied to surface-associated populations. The simulation results, supported by some experimental findings, showed that these measures can be affected by initial cell densities, donor-to-recipient ratios and initial cell cluster size, and are therefore flawed as universal measures of plasmid transfer efficiency. The simulations also allowed us to formulate some guiding principles on when these estimates are appropriate for spatially structured populations and how to interpret the results. While we focus on plasmid transfer, the general lessons of this study should apply to any measures of horizontal spread (e.g., infection rates in epidemiology) that are based on simple mass-action models (e.g., SIR models in epidemiology) but applied to spatial settings.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22085738      PMCID: PMC3346278          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.10.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  30 in total

1.  Phenotypic plasticity in bacterial plasmids.

Authors:  Paul E Turner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Plasmid donor affects host range of promiscuous IncP-1beta plasmid pB10 in an activated-sludge microbial community.

Authors:  Leen De Gelder; Frederik P J Vandecasteele; Celeste J Brown; Larry J Forney; Eva M Top
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Estimating the rate of plasmid transfer: an end-point method.

Authors:  L Simonsen; D M Gordon; F M Stewart; B R Levin
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1990-11

4.  Mathematical Model of Plasmid Transfer between Strains of Streptomycetes in Soil Microcosms.

Authors:  L J Clewlow; N Cresswell; E M Wellington
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Unconstrained bacterial promiscuity: the Tn916-Tn1545 family of conjugative transposons.

Authors:  D B Clewell; S E Flannagan; D D Jaworski
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 17.079

6.  Effect of bacterial distribution and activity on conjugal gene transfer on the phylloplane of the bush bean (Phaseolus vulgaris).

Authors:  B Normander; B B Christensen; S Molin; N Kroer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Inactivation of antibiotics and the dissemination of resistance genes.

Authors:  J Davies
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-04-15       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Chromosome transfer and R-prime plasmid formation mediated by plasmid pULB113 (RP4::mini-Mu) in Alcaligenes eutrophus CH34 and Pseudomonas fluorescens 6.2.

Authors:  P Lejeune; M Mergeay; F Van Gijsegem; M Faelen; J Gerits; A Toussaint
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  The 64 508 bp IncP-1beta antibiotic multiresistance plasmid pB10 isolated from a waste-water treatment plant provides evidence for recombination between members of different branches of the IncP-1beta group.

Authors:  A Schlüter; H Heuer; R Szczepanowski; L J Forney; C M Thomas; A Pühler; E M Top
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.777

10.  Experimental and mathematical models of Escherichia coli plasmid transfer in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  R Freter; R R Freter; H Brickner
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 3.441

View more
  17 in total

1.  The Conjugation Window in an Escherichia coli K-12 Strain with an IncFII Plasmid.

Authors:  Brendan Headd; Scott A Bradford
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Genetic drift suppresses bacterial conjugation in spatially structured populations.

Authors:  Peter D Freese; Kirill S Korolev; José I Jiménez; Irene A Chen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Harmful behaviour through plasmid transfer: a successful evolutionary strategy of bacteria harbouring conjugative plasmids.

Authors:  Célia P F Domingues; João S Rebelo; Francisca Monteiro; Teresa Nogueira; Francisco Dionisio
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Invasion of E. coli biofilms by antibiotic resistance plasmids.

Authors:  Jaroslaw E Król; Andrzej J Wojtowicz; Linda M Rogers; Holger Heuer; Kornelia Smalla; Stephen M Krone; Eva M Top
Journal:  Plasmid       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.466

5.  Mathematical modelling to study the horizontal transfer of antimicrobial resistance genes in bacteria: current state of the field and recommendations.

Authors:  Quentin J Leclerc; Jodi A Lindsay; Gwenan M Knight
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  In situ monitoring of IncF plasmid transfer on semi-solid agar surfaces reveals a limited invasion of plasmids in recipient colonies.

Authors:  Andreas Reisner; Heimo Wolinski; Ellen L Zechner
Journal:  Plasmid       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 3.466

7.  Sensitivity analysis of Repast computational ecology models with R/Repast.

Authors:  Antonio Prestes García; Alfonso Rodríguez-Patón
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Predictive Modeling of a Batch Filter Mating Process.

Authors:  Akshay Malwade; Angel Nguyen; Peivand Sadat-Mousavi; Brian P Ingalls
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Effect of donor-recipient relatedness on the plasmid conjugation frequency: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jesse B Alderliesten; Sarah J N Duxbury; Mark P Zwart; J Arjan G M de Visser; Arjan Stegeman; Egil A J Fischer
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  Antibiotic resistance shaping multi-level population biology of bacteria.

Authors:  Fernando Baquero; Ana P Tedim; Teresa M Coque
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.