Literature DB >> 22085228

Brief review of models of ectopic bone formation.

Michelle A Scott1, Benjamin Levi, Asal Askarinam, Alan Nguyen, Todd Rackohn, Kang Ting, Chia Soo, Aaron W James.   

Abstract

Ectopic bone formation is a unique biologic entity--distinct from other areas of skeletal biology. Animal research models of ectopic bone formation most often employ rodent models and have unique advantages over orthotopic (bone) environments, including a relative lack of bone cytokine stimulation and cell-to-cell interaction with endogenous (host) bone-forming cells. This allows for relatively controlled in vivo experimental bone formation. A wide variety of ectopic locations have been used for experimentation, including subcutaneous, intramuscular, and kidney capsule transplantation. The method, benefits and detractions of each method are summarized in the following review. Briefly, subcutaneous implantation is the simplest method. However, the most pertinent concern is the relative paucity of bone formation in comparison to other models. Intramuscular implantation is also widely used and relatively simple, however intramuscular implants are exposed to skeletal muscle satellite progenitor cells. Thus, distinguishing host from donor osteogenesis becomes challenging without cell-tracking studies. The kidney capsule (perirenal or renal capsule) method is less widely used and more technically challenging. It allows for supraphysiologic blood and nutrient resource, promoting robust bone growth. In summary, ectopic bone models are extremely useful in the evaluation of bone-forming stem cells, new osteoinductive biomaterials, and growth factors; an appropriate choice of model, however, will greatly increase experimental success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22085228      PMCID: PMC3295855          DOI: 10.1089/scd.2011.0517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells Dev        ISSN: 1547-3287            Impact factor:   3.272


  100 in total

Review 1.  Heterotopic ossification following combat-related trauma.

Authors:  Benjamin K Potter; Jonathan A Forsberg; Thomas A Davis; Korboi N Evans; Jason S Hawksworth; Doug Tadaki; Trevor S Brown; Nicole J Crane; Travis C Burns; Frederick P O'Brien; Eric A Elster
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Odontogenic capability: bone marrow stromal stem cells versus dental pulp stem cells.

Authors:  Jinhua Yu; Yijing Wang; Zhihong Deng; Liang Tang; Yuanfei Li; Junnan Shi; Yan Jin
Journal:  Biol Cell       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.458

3.  Acute skeletal injury is necessary for human adipose-derived stromal cell-mediated calvarial regeneration.

Authors:  Benjamin Levi; Aaron W James; Emily R Nelson; Michelle Peng; Derrick C Wan; George W Commons; Min Lee; Benjamin Wu; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Dura mater stimulates human adipose-derived stromal cells to undergo bone formation in mouse calvarial defects.

Authors:  Benjamin Levi; Emily R Nelson; Shuli Li; Aaron W James; Jeong S Hyun; Daniel T Montoro; Min Lee; Jason P Glotzbach; George W Commons; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 6.277

5.  Calcium phosphates compounds in conjunction with hydrogel as carrier for BMP-2: a study on ectopic bone formation in rats.

Authors:  Gry Hulsart-Billström; Qinghong Hu; Kristoffer Bergman; Kenneth B Jonsson; Jonas Åberg; Ruikang Tang; Sune Larsson; Jöns Hilborn
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 8.947

6.  Combined effects of porous hydroxyapatite and demineralized bone matrix on bone induction: in vitro and in vivo study using a nude rat model.

Authors:  Jae Hyup Lee; Kyung-Mee Lee; Hae-Ri Baek; Soo-Jeong Jang; Ji-Ho Lee; Hyun-Seung Ryu
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 3.715

7.  Analysis of the soluble human tooth proteome and its ability to induce dentin/tooth regeneration.

Authors:  So Young Chun; Hyo Jung Lee; Young Ae Choi; Kyung Min Kim; Sang Heum Baek; Hyo Sang Park; Jae-Young Kim; Jung-Mo Ahn; Je-Yeol Cho; Dong-Woo Cho; Hong-In Shin; Eui Kyun Park
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 3.845

8.  COMP-Ang1, a chimeric form of Angiopoietin 1, enhances BMP2-induced osteoblast differentiation and bone formation.

Authors:  Byung-Chul Jeong; Hyun-Joo Kim; In-Ho Bae; Kkot-Nim Lee; Kwang-Youl Lee; Won-Mann Oh; Sun-Hun Kim; In-Chol Kang; Shee-Eun Lee; Gou-Young Koh; Kyung-Keun Kim; Jeong-Tae Koh
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Bone tissue formation in sheep muscles induced by a biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic and fibrin glue composite.

Authors:  Damien Le Nihouannen; Afchine Saffarzadeh; Olivier Gauthier; Françoise Moreau; Paul Pilet; Reiner Spaethe; Pierre Layrolle; Guy Daculsi
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Progressive osseous heteroplasia in a 10-year-old male child.

Authors:  Girish K Singh; Vikas Verma
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.251

View more
  49 in total

1.  Direct Mouse Trauma/Burn Model of Heterotopic Ossification.

Authors:  Jonathan R Peterson; Shailesh Agarwal; R Cameron Brownley; Shawn J Loder; Kavitha Ranganathan; Paul S Cederna; Yuji Mishina; Stewart C Wang; Benjamin Levi
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 2.  Stem cells and heterotopic ossification: Lessons from animal models.

Authors:  John B Lees-Shepard; David J Goldhamer
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Inhibition of osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by copper supplementation.

Authors:  S Li; M Wang; X Chen; S-F Li; J Li-Ling; H-Q Xie
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 6.831

4.  Rational design of hydrogels to enhance osteogenic potential.

Authors:  Soyon Kim; Min Lee
Journal:  Chem Mater       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 9.811

5.  Effects of aging on osteogenic response and heterotopic ossification following burn injury in mice.

Authors:  Jonathan R Peterson; Oluwatobi N Eboda; R Cameron Brownley; Katherine E Cilwa; Lauren E Pratt; Sara De La Rosa; Shailesh Agarwal; Steven R Buchman; Paul S Cederna; Michael D Morris; Stewart C Wang; Benjamin Levi
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.272

6.  In-vivo evaluation of subcutaneously implanted cell-loaded apatite microcarriers for osteogenic potency.

Authors:  Poon Nian Lim; Jason Feng; Zuyong Wang; Mark Chong; Toshiisa Konishi; Lay Geok Tan; Jerry Chan; Eng San Thian
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  A thermoresponsive, citrate-based macromolecule for bone regenerative engineering.

Authors:  Simona Morochnik; Yunxiao Zhu; Chongwen Duan; Michelle Cai; Russell R Reid; Tong-Chuan He; Jason Koh; Igal Szleifer; Guillermo A Ameer
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 4.396

8.  The Paracrine Role of Endothelial Cells in Bone Formation via CXCR4/SDF-1 Pathway.

Authors:  Tal Tamari; Rawan Kawar-Jaraisy; Ofri Doppelt; Ben Giladi; Nadin Sabbah; Hadar Zigdon-Giladi
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 6.600

9.  Influence of Bone and Muscle Injuries on the Osteogenic Potential of Muscle Progenitors: Contribution of Tissue Environment to Heterotopic Ossification.

Authors:  Jeremy Molligan; Reed Mitchell; Lew Schon; Samuel Achilefu; Talal Zahoor; Young Cho; Jeffery Loube; Zijun Zhang
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 6.940

10.  Functional cartilage repair capacity of de-differentiated, chondrocyte- and mesenchymal stem cell-laden hydrogels in vitro.

Authors:  L Rackwitz; F Djouad; S Janjanin; U Nöth; R S Tuan
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 6.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.