Literature DB >> 22084861

Nanotechnology risk perceptions and communication: emerging technologies, emerging challenges.

Nick Pidgeon1, Barbara Harthorn, Terre Satterfield.   

Abstract

Nanotechnology involves the fabrication, manipulation, and control of materials at the atomic level and may also bring novel uncertainties and risks. Potential parallels with other controversial technologies mean there is a need to develop a comprehensive understanding of processes of public perception of nanotechnology uncertainties, risks, and benefits, alongside related communication issues. Study of perceptions, at so early a stage in the development trajectory of a technology, is probably unique in the risk perception and communication field. As such it also brings new methodological and conceptual challenges. These include: dealing with the inherent diversity of the nanotechnology field itself; the unfamiliar and intangible nature of the concept, with few analogies to anchor mental models or risk perceptions; and the ethical and value questions underlying many nanotechnology debates. Utilizing the lens of social amplification of risk, and drawing upon the various contributions to this special issue of Risk Analysis on Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions and Communication, nanotechnology may at present be an attenuated hazard. The generic idea of "upstream public engagement" for emerging technologies such as nanotechnology is also discussed, alongside its importance for future work with emerging technologies in the risk communication field.
© 2011 Society for Risk Analysis.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22084861     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01738.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  4 in total

1.  Pharmaceuticals released from senior residences: occurrence and risk evaluation.

Authors:  Silvia Lacorte; Silvia Luis; Cristian Gómez-Canela; Teresa Sala-Comorera; Audrey Courtier; Benoit Roig; Ana Maria Oliveira-Brett; Claire Joannis-Cassan; Juan Ignacio Aragonés; Lucia Poggio; Thierry Noguer; Luisa Lima; Carlos Barata; Carole Calas-Blanchard
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Perceptions of risk from nanotechnologies and trust in stakeholders: a cross sectional study of public, academic, government and business attitudes.

Authors:  Adam Capon; James Gillespie; Margaret Rolfe; Wayne Smith
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Framework for the analysis of nanotechnologies' impacts and ethical acceptability: basis of an interdisciplinary approach to assessing novel technologies.

Authors:  Johane Patenaude; Georges-Auguste Legault; Jacques Beauvais; Louise Bernier; Jean-Pierre Béland; Patrick Boissy; Vanessa Chenel; Charles-Étienne Daniel; Jonathan Genest; Marie-Sol Poirier; Danielle Tapin
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Consumer acceptance of and willingness to pay for food nanotechnology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Emma L Giles; Sharron Kuznesof; Beth Clark; Carmen Hubbard; Lynn J Frewer
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 2.253

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.