Literature DB >> 22084849

The needle in the haystack: international consortia and the return of individual research results.

Susan E Wallace1.   

Abstract

Returning individual results to participants in research studies is gaining acceptance and policy guidance is now available for investigators to develop a plan for returning results at the local level. However, returning results discovered through the work of an international scientific research consortium presents additional ethical and procedural difficulties. No general guidance is available for international consortia that wish to consider this issue, but there are examples of internal policies that are being used by consortia such as the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) and the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium (T1DGC). This paper presents the policy stance these studies have adopted regarding returning individual research results and their reasons behind it, and gives specific examples from their policy documents and project consent materials. Finally, it suggests an oversight mechanism these and other international consortia can use to ensure that this important issue is addressed appropriately.
© 2011 American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22084849     DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00630.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Law Med Ethics        ISSN: 1073-1105            Impact factor:   1.718


  5 in total

1.  Utilizing Focus Groups with Potential Participants and Their Parents: An Approach to Inform Study Design in a Large Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Sandeep Kadimpati; Jennifer B McCormick; Yichen Chiu; Ashley B Parker; Aliya Z Iftikhar; Randall P Flick; David O Warner
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2014-01-01

2.  DataSHIELD: taking the analysis to the data, not the data to the analysis.

Authors:  Amadou Gaye; Yannick Marcon; Julia Isaeva; Philippe LaFlamme; Andrew Turner; Elinor M Jones; Joel Minion; Andrew W Boyd; Christopher J Newby; Marja-Liisa Nuotio; Rebecca Wilson; Oliver Butters; Barnaby Murtagh; Ipek Demir; Dany Doiron; Lisette Giepmans; Susan E Wallace; Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne; Carsten Oliver Schmidt; Paolo Boffetta; Mathieu Boniol; Maria Bota; Kim W Carter; Nick deKlerk; Chris Dibben; Richard W Francis; Tero Hiekkalinna; Kristian Hveem; Kirsti Kvaløy; Sean Millar; Ivan J Perry; Annette Peters; Catherine M Phillips; Frank Popham; Gillian Raab; Eva Reischl; Nuala Sheehan; Melanie Waldenberger; Markus Perola; Edwin van den Heuvel; John Macleod; Bartha M Knoppers; Ronald P Stolk; Isabel Fortier; Jennifer R Harris; Bruce H R Woffenbuttel; Madeleine J Murtagh; Vincent Ferretti; Paul R Burton
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  Population studies: return of research results and incidental findings Policy Statement.

Authors:  Bartha Maria Knoppers; Mylène Deschênes; Ma'n H Zawati; Anne Marie Tassé
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Returning findings within longitudinal cohort studies: the 1958 birth cohort as an exemplar.

Authors:  Susan E Wallace; Neil M Walker; Jane Elliott
Journal:  Emerg Themes Epidemiol       Date:  2014-08-04

5.  Governance of research consortia: challenges of implementing Responsible Research and Innovation within Europe.

Authors:  Michael Morrison; Miranda Mourby; Heather Gowans; Sarah Coy; Jane Kaye
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2020-11-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.