Literature DB >> 22084207

Determination of grade and subtype of meningiomas by using histogram analysis of diffusion-tensor imaging metrics.

Sumei Wang1, Sungheon Kim, Yu Zhang, Lu Wang, Edward B Lee, Peter Syre, Harish Poptani, Elias R Melhem, John Y K Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether histogram analysis of diffusion-tensor (DT) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging metrics, including tensor shape measurements, can help determine the grades and subtypes of meningiomas.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant study. Nine atypical, three anaplastic, and 39 typical meningiomas were retrospectively studied. The 39 typical meningiomas included one secretory meningioma and 11 fibroblastic, 11 transitional, 14 meningothelial, and two angiomatous meningiomas. DT imaging metrics, including fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, linear anisotropy coefficient, planar anisotropy coefficient (CP), spherical anisotropy coefficient (CS), and eigenvalue skewness (SK), as well as normalized signal intensity from contrast-enhanced T1- and T2-weighted images, were measured from the enhancing region of the tumor. Mean, variance, skewness, and kurtosis were extracted from the histograms. A two-level decision tree was designed, and a multivariate logistic regression analysis was used at each level to determine the best model for classification.
RESULTS: Histogram skewness of SK and kurtosis of SK were significantly higher in atypical and anaplastic meningiomas than in typical meningiomas (P<.01). Among typical meningiomas, significant differences in histogram measures of CP and CS between fibroblastic meningiomas and other subtypes were observed (P<.01). The best model for differentiating atypical and anaplastic meningiomas from typical meningiomas consisted of mean and skewness of SK and kurtosis of T1 signal intensity, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.946. The best model for differentiating fibroblastic meningiomas from other subtypes consisted of skewness of T2 signal intensity and kurtosis of CP (AUC, 0.970).
CONCLUSION: Histogram analysis of DT imaging metrics can help determine the grades and subtypes of meningiomas, which can better assist in surgical planning. © RSNA, 2011

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22084207     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11110576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  25 in total

1.  Diffusion tensor imaging tensor shape analysis for assessment of regional white matter differences.

Authors:  Dana M Middleton; Jonathan Y Li; Hui J Lee; Steven Chen; Patricia I Dickson; N Matthew Ellinwood; Leonard E White; James M Provenzale
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2017-06-20

2.  The diagnostic value of using combined MR diffusion tensor imaging parameters to differentiate between low- and high-grade meningioma.

Authors:  Kerim Aslan; Hediye Pinar Gunbey; Leman Tomak; Lutfi Incesu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Diagnostic utility of diffusion tensor imaging in differentiating glioblastomas from brain metastases.

Authors:  S Wang; S J Kim; H Poptani; J H Woo; S Mohan; R Jin; M R Voluck; D M O'Rourke; R L Wolf; E R Melhem; S Kim
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis imaging derived maps may distinguish between low and high grade gliomas before surgery.

Authors:  Xi-Xun Qi; Da-Fa Shi; Si-Xie Ren; Su-Ya Zhang; Long Li; Qing-Chang Li; Li-Ming Guan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Assessment of angiographic vascularity of meningiomas with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion-weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  C H Toh; K-C Wei; C N Chang; Y-W Peng; S-H Ng; H-F Wong; C-P Lin
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  The histogram analysis of diffusion-weighted intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging for differentiating the gleason grade of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yu-Dong Zhang; Qing Wang; Chen-Jiang Wu; Xiao-Ning Wang; Jing Zhang; Hui Liu; Xi-Sheng Liu; Hai-Bin Shi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Imaging and diagnostic advances for intracranial meningiomas.

Authors:  Raymond Y Huang; Wenya Linda Bi; Brent Griffith; Timothy J Kaufmann; Christian la Fougère; Nils Ole Schmidt; Jöerg C Tonn; Michael A Vogelbaum; Patrick Y Wen; Kenneth Aldape; Farshad Nassiri; Gelareh Zadeh; Ian F Dunn
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 12.300

8.  The link between diffusion MRI and tumor heterogeneity: Mapping cell eccentricity and density by diffusional variance decomposition (DIVIDE).

Authors:  Filip Szczepankiewicz; Danielle van Westen; Elisabet Englund; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Freddy Ståhlberg; Jimmy Lätt; Pia C Sundgren; Markus Nilsson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 9.  Variants of meningiomas: a review of imaging findings and clinical features.

Authors:  Akira Kunimatsu; Natsuko Kunimatsu; Kouhei Kamiya; Masaki Katsura; Harushi Mori; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 2.374

10.  Radiomics and machine learning may accurately predict the grade and histological subtype in meningiomas using conventional and diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Yae Won Park; Jongmin Oh; Seng Chan You; Kyunghwa Han; Sung Soo Ahn; Yoon Seong Choi; Jong Hee Chang; Se Hoon Kim; Seung-Koo Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.