Literature DB >> 22083596

Stool DNA testing for the detection of pancreatic cancer: assessment of methylation marker candidates.

John B Kisiel1, Tracy C Yab, William R Taylor, Suresh T Chari, Gloria M Petersen, Douglas W Mahoney, David A Ahlquist.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer (PanC) presents at late stage with high mortality. Effective early detection methods are needed. Aberrantly methylated genes are unexplored as markers for noninvasive detection by stool testing. The authors aimed to select discriminant methylated genes and to assess accuracy of these and mutant KRAS in stool to detect PanC.
METHODS: Nine target genes were assayed by real-time methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) in bisulfite-treated DNA from microdissected frozen specimens of 24 PanC cases and 30 normal colon controls. Archived stools from 58 PanC cases and 65 controls matched on sex, age, and smoking were analyzed. Target genes from fecal supernatants were enriched by hybrid capture, bisulfite-treated, and assayed by MSP. KRAS mutations were assayed using the QuARTS technique.
RESULTS: Areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUCs) for tissue BMP3, NDRG4, EYA4, UCHL1, MDFI, Vimentin, CNTNAP2, SFRP2, and TFPI2 were 0.90, 0.79, 0.78, 0.78, 0.77, 0.77, 0.69, 0.67, and 0.66, respectively. The top 4 markers and mutant KRAS were evaluated in stool. BMP3 was the most discriminant methylation marker in stool. At 90% specificity, methylated BMP3 alone detected 51% of PanCs, mutant KRAS detected 50%, and combination detected 67%. AUCs for methylated BMP3, mutant KRAS, and combination in stool were 0.73, 0.75, and 0.85, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that stool assay of a methylated gene marker can detect PanC. Among candidate methylated markers discriminant in tissue, BMP3 alone performed well in stool. Combining methylated BMP3 and mutant KRAS increased stool detection over either marker alone.
Copyright © 2011 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22083596      PMCID: PMC3292683          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  38 in total

Review 1.  Next-generation stool DNA testing: expanding the scope.

Authors:  David A Ahlquist
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2009-04-18       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Familial risk of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  M Schenk; A G Schwartz; E O'Neal; M Kinnard; J K Greenson; J P Fryzek; G S Ying; D H Garabrant
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-04-18       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Aberrant methylation of preproenkephalin and p16 genes in pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Noriyoshi Fukushima; Norihiro Sato; Takashi Ueki; Christophe Rosty; Kimberly M Walter; Robb E Wilentz; Charles J Yeo; Ralph H Hruban; Michael Goggins
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Aberrant methylation of the 5' CpG island of TSLC1 is common in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and is first manifest in high-grade PanlNs.

Authors:  Marnix Jansen; Noriyoshi Fukushima; Christophe Rosty; Kim Walter; Renee Altink; Tjarda Van Heek; Ralph Hruban; Johan G Offerhaus; Michael Goggins
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.742

5.  Islet amyloid polypeptide is not a satisfactory marker for detecting pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  S T Chari; G G Klee; L J Miller; M Raimondo; E P DiMagno
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 6.  Familial pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  A P Klein; R H Hruban; K A Brune; G M Petersen; M Goggins
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.360

7.  Prognostic factors in resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: analysis of actual 5-year survivors.

Authors:  Sean P Cleary; Robert Gryfe; Maha Guindi; Paul Greig; Lloyd Smith; Robert Mackenzie; Steven Strasberg; Sherif Hanna; Bryce Taylor; Bernard Langer; Steven Gallinger
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Bone morphogenetic protein 3B silencing in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Zunyan Dai; Anthony P Popkie; Wei-Guo Zhu; Cynthia D Timmers; Aparna Raval; Sarah Tannehill-Gregg; Carl D Morrison; Herbert Auer; Robert A Kratzke; Gloria Niehans; Stefan Amatschek; Wolfgang Sommergruber; Gustavo W Leone; Thomas Rosol; Gregory A Otterson; Christoph Plass
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  Cost-effectiveness of pancreatic cancer screening in familial pancreatic cancer kindreds.

Authors:  Stephen J Rulyak; Michael B Kimmey; David L Veenstra; Teresa A Brentnall
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Detection of K-ras mutations in the stool of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and pancreatic ductal hyperplasia.

Authors:  C Caldas; S A Hahn; R H Hruban; M S Redston; C J Yeo; S E Kern
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1994-07-01       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  55 in total

Review 1.  Fecal DNA testing for colorectal cancer screening: Molecular targets and perspectives.

Authors:  Amaninder Dhaliwal; Panagiotis J Vlachostergios; Katerina G Oikonomou; Yitzchak Moshenyat
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-10-15

Review 2.  The Triple-Code Model for Pancreatic Cancer: Cross Talk Among Genetics, Epigenetics, and Nuclear Structure.

Authors:  Gwen A Lomberk; Raul Urrutia
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 3.  Non-invasive biomarkers in pancreatic cancer diagnosis: what we need versus what we have.

Authors:  Marta Herreros-Villanueva; Luis Bujanda
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-04

4.  Hypermethylation of TFPI2 correlates with cervical cancer incidence in the Uygur and Han populations of Xinjiang, China.

Authors:  Yuling Dong; Qiufen Tan; Lin Tao; Xiaolin Pan; Lijuan Pang; Weihua Liang; Wei Liu; Wenjie Zhang; Feng Li; Wei Jia
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-02-01

5.  Vimentin DNA methylation predicts survival in breast cancer.

Authors:  Jacob Ulirsch; Cheng Fan; George Knafl; Ming Jing Wu; Brett Coleman; Charles M Perou; Theresa Swift-Scanlan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Fecal Recovery of Ingested Cellular DNA: Implications for Noninvasive Detection of Upper Gastrointestinal Neoplasms.

Authors:  Benjamin B Strauss; Tracy C Yab; Helen M O'Connor; William R Taylor; Douglas W Mahoney; Julie A Simonson; John Christensen; Suresh T Chari; David A Ahlquist
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Nataliya Razumilava; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Multi-target stool DNA test: a new high bar for noninvasive screening.

Authors:  David A Ahlquist
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Polymorphisms in bone morphogenetic protein 3 and the risk of papillary thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Young Ock Kim; Il Ki Hong; Young Gyu Eun; Seong-Su Nah; Soojeong Lee; Su-Hak Heo; Hyung-Kee Kim; Ho-Yeon Song; Hak-Jae Kim
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Patient perceptions of stool DNA testing for pan-digestive cancer screening: a survey questionnaire.

Authors:  Dennis Yang; Shauna L Hillman; Ann M Harris; Pamela S Sinicrope; Mary E Devens; David A Ahlquist
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.