BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer (PanC) presents at late stage with high mortality. Effective early detection methods are needed. Aberrantly methylated genes are unexplored as markers for noninvasive detection by stool testing. The authors aimed to select discriminant methylated genes and to assess accuracy of these and mutant KRAS in stool to detect PanC. METHODS: Nine target genes were assayed by real-time methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) in bisulfite-treated DNA from microdissected frozen specimens of 24 PanC cases and 30 normal colon controls. Archived stools from 58 PanC cases and 65 controls matched on sex, age, and smoking were analyzed. Target genes from fecal supernatants were enriched by hybrid capture, bisulfite-treated, and assayed by MSP. KRAS mutations were assayed using the QuARTS technique. RESULTS: Areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUCs) for tissue BMP3, NDRG4, EYA4, UCHL1, MDFI, Vimentin, CNTNAP2, SFRP2, and TFPI2 were 0.90, 0.79, 0.78, 0.78, 0.77, 0.77, 0.69, 0.67, and 0.66, respectively. The top 4 markers and mutant KRAS were evaluated in stool. BMP3 was the most discriminant methylation marker in stool. At 90% specificity, methylated BMP3 alone detected 51% of PanCs, mutant KRAS detected 50%, and combination detected 67%. AUCs for methylated BMP3, mutant KRAS, and combination in stool were 0.73, 0.75, and 0.85, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that stool assay of a methylated gene marker can detect PanC. Among candidate methylated markers discriminant in tissue, BMP3 alone performed well in stool. Combining methylated BMP3 and mutant KRAS increased stool detection over either marker alone.
BACKGROUND:Pancreatic cancer (PanC) presents at late stage with high mortality. Effective early detection methods are needed. Aberrantly methylated genes are unexplored as markers for noninvasive detection by stool testing. The authors aimed to select discriminant methylated genes and to assess accuracy of these and mutant KRAS in stool to detect PanC. METHODS: Nine target genes were assayed by real-time methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) in bisulfite-treated DNA from microdissected frozen specimens of 24 PanC cases and 30 normal colon controls. Archived stools from 58 PanC cases and 65 controls matched on sex, age, and smoking were analyzed. Target genes from fecal supernatants were enriched by hybrid capture, bisulfite-treated, and assayed by MSP. KRAS mutations were assayed using the QuARTS technique. RESULTS: Areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUCs) for tissue BMP3, NDRG4, EYA4, UCHL1, MDFI, Vimentin, CNTNAP2, SFRP2, and TFPI2 were 0.90, 0.79, 0.78, 0.78, 0.77, 0.77, 0.69, 0.67, and 0.66, respectively. The top 4 markers and mutant KRAS were evaluated in stool. BMP3 was the most discriminant methylation marker in stool. At 90% specificity, methylated BMP3 alone detected 51% of PanCs, mutant KRAS detected 50%, and combination detected 67%. AUCs for methylated BMP3, mutant KRAS, and combination in stool were 0.73, 0.75, and 0.85, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that stool assay of a methylated gene marker can detect PanC. Among candidate methylated markers discriminant in tissue, BMP3 alone performed well in stool. Combining methylated BMP3 and mutant KRAS increased stool detection over either marker alone.
Authors: M Schenk; A G Schwartz; E O'Neal; M Kinnard; J K Greenson; J P Fryzek; G S Ying; D H Garabrant Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2001-04-18 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Noriyoshi Fukushima; Norihiro Sato; Takashi Ueki; Christophe Rosty; Kimberly M Walter; Robb E Wilentz; Charles J Yeo; Ralph H Hruban; Michael Goggins Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Marnix Jansen; Noriyoshi Fukushima; Christophe Rosty; Kim Walter; Renee Altink; Tjarda Van Heek; Ralph Hruban; Johan G Offerhaus; Michael Goggins Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2002 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Sean P Cleary; Robert Gryfe; Maha Guindi; Paul Greig; Lloyd Smith; Robert Mackenzie; Steven Strasberg; Sherif Hanna; Bryce Taylor; Bernard Langer; Steven Gallinger Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Zunyan Dai; Anthony P Popkie; Wei-Guo Zhu; Cynthia D Timmers; Aparna Raval; Sarah Tannehill-Gregg; Carl D Morrison; Herbert Auer; Robert A Kratzke; Gloria Niehans; Stefan Amatschek; Wolfgang Sommergruber; Gustavo W Leone; Thomas Rosol; Gregory A Otterson; Christoph Plass Journal: Oncogene Date: 2004-04-29 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Jacob Ulirsch; Cheng Fan; George Knafl; Ming Jing Wu; Brett Coleman; Charles M Perou; Theresa Swift-Scanlan Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2012-12-13 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Benjamin B Strauss; Tracy C Yab; Helen M O'Connor; William R Taylor; Douglas W Mahoney; Julie A Simonson; John Christensen; Suresh T Chari; David A Ahlquist Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2015-08-22 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Young Ock Kim; Il Ki Hong; Young Gyu Eun; Seong-Su Nah; Soojeong Lee; Su-Hak Heo; Hyung-Kee Kim; Ho-Yeon Song; Hak-Jae Kim Journal: Oncol Lett Date: 2012-10-10 Impact factor: 2.967
Authors: Dennis Yang; Shauna L Hillman; Ann M Harris; Pamela S Sinicrope; Mary E Devens; David A Ahlquist Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-05-07 Impact factor: 5.742