Literature DB >> 22083055

Cost-effectiveness of general anesthesia vs spinal anesthesia in fast-track abdominal benign hysterectomy.

Ninnie Borendal Wodlin1, Lena Nilsson, Per Carlsson, Preben Kjølhede.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to compare total costs for hospital stay and postoperative recovery for 2 groups of women who underwent fast-track abdominal benign hysterectomy: 1 group under general anesthesia; 1 group under spinal anesthesia. Costs were evaluated in relation to health-related quality of life. STUDY
DESIGN: Costs of treatment were analyzed retrospectively with data from a randomized multicenter study at 5 hospitals in Sweden. Of 180 women who were scheduled for benign abdominal hysterectomy, 162 women were assigned randomly for the study: 80 women allocated to general anesthesia and 82 women to spinal anesthesia.
RESULTS: Total costs (hospital costs plus cost-reduced productivity costs) were lower for the spinal anesthesia group. Women who had spinal anesthesia had a faster recovery that was measured by health-related quality of life and quality adjusted life-years gained in postoperative month 1.
CONCLUSION: The use of spinal anesthesia for fast-track benign abdominal hysterectomy was more cost-effective than general anesthesia.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22083055     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.05.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  7 in total

1.  Risk Scores to Improve Quality and Realize Health Economic Gains in Perioperative Care.

Authors:  Karsten Bartels; Robert L Lobato; Cathy J Bradley
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy under epidural anesthesia versus general anesthesia: A randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Manzoor Ahmad Dar; Sajad Ahmad Malik; Yaser Ahmed Dar; Prince Muzafer Wani; Mohammad Saleem Wani; Arif Hamid; Abdul Rouf Khawaja; Khalid Parvez Sofi
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2021-07-14

3.  Effect of Two Different Doses of Dexmedetomidine as Adjuvant in Bupivacaine Induced Subarachnoid Block for Elective Abdominal Hysterectomy Operations: A Prospective, Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Anjan Das; Susanta Halder; Surajit Chattopadhyay; Parthajit Mandal; Subinay Chhaule; Rezina Banu
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2015-07

4.  The Effect of Spinal and General Anesthesia on Serum Lipid Peroxides and Total Antioxidant Capacity in Diabetic Patients with Lower Limb Amputation Surgery.

Authors:  Arash Peivandi Yazdi; Alireza Bameshki; Maryam Salehi; Gholamhosein Kazemzadeh; Majid Sharifian Razavi; Shaghayegh Rahmani; Seyed Isaac Hashemy
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2018-07

5.  Using critical care physicians to deliver anesthesia and boost surgical caseload in austere environments: the Critical Care General Anesthesia Syllabus (CC GAS).

Authors:  Quincy K Tran; Natalie M Mark; Lia I Losonczy; Michael T McCurdy; James H Lantry; Marc E Augustin; Lovely N Colas; Richard Skupski; Arthur S Toth; Bhavesh M Patel; Donald F Zimmer; Rebecca Tracy; Mark Walsh
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-06-18

6.  Comparison of Fentanyl and Dexmedetomidine as Intrathecal Adjuvants to Spinal Anaesthesia for Abdominal Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Binod Gautam; Sushila Tabdar; Ujma Shrestha
Journal:  JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.406

7.  Intravenous magnesium sulfate for postoperative analgesia after abdominal hysterectomy under spinal anesthesia: a randomized, double-blind trial.

Authors:  Márcio Luiz Benevides; Danielle Carvalho Fialho; Daiane Linck; Ana Luiza Oliveira; Dennis Henrique Vieira Ramalho; Marília Marquioreto Benevides
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-03-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.