Literature DB >> 22082440

Phenylbutazone and flunixin meglumine used singly or in combination in experimental lameness in horses.

J H Foreman1, R Ruemmler.   

Abstract

REASON FOR PERFORMING STUDY: Using an adjustable heart bar shoe model of foot pain, the objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that the combined use of phenylbutazone (PBZ) and flunixin meglumine (FM) would prove more efficacious in alleviating lameness than either drug alone.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hour after induction of lameness at weekly intervals, 8 healthy adult Thoroughbred horses randomly underwent one of 4 i.v. treatments: saline (SAL) placebo (1 ml/45 kg bwt), PBZ (4.4 mg/kg bwt), FM (1.1 mg/kg bwt) or PBZ+FM (at the same dosages as given individually). Heart rate (HR) and lameness score (LS) responses were assessed in a blinded manner every 20 min for 5 h after lameness induction and then hourly for 12 h after treatment. Jugular venous blood samples were obtained at -1, 0, 0.05, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 h and subsequently analysed for drug concentrations. Repeated measures ANOVA and post hoc Tukey's test were used to identify analgesic effects at a significance level of P<0.05.
RESULTS: Heart rate was lower in all nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-treated trials from 2 h to 10 h post treatment (P<0.05). Analgesic effects of FM and PBZ+FM, as evidenced by decreases in HR, lasted for 12 h post treatment (P<0.05). Lameness score decreased earlier in PBZ and PBZ+FM trials than in FM trials (P<0.05) and the analgesic effect on LS lasted for 12 h post treatment for all NSAID trials (P<0.05). Peak PBZ plasma concentration was 73.7 ± 6.0 and 77.9 ± 5.5 µg/ml. Peak FM concentration was 12.0 ± 0.8 and 13.7 ± 1.0 µg/ml.
CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that the combination of PBZ+FM was not more effective than either PBZ or FM alone. These data do not support the hypothesis that the combination is more efficacious at these dosages than either drug alone in this model of acute foot pain.
© 2011 EVJ Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22082440     DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00485.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Equine Vet J Suppl


  3 in total

1.  Comparative efficacy of oral meloxicam and phenylbutazone in 2 experimental pain models in the horse.

Authors:  Heidi Banse; Alastair E Cribb
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.008

Review 2.  Pain assessment in animal models: do we need further studies?

Authors:  Carmelo Gigliuto; Manuela De Gregori; Valentina Malafoglia; William Raffaeli; Christian Compagnone; Livia Visai; Paola Petrini; Maria Antonietta Avanzini; Carolina Muscoli; Jacopo Viganò; Francesco Calabrese; Tommaso Dominioni; Massimo Allegri; Lorenzo Cobianchi
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 3.  Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in equine orthopaedics.

Authors:  Carrie C Jacobs; Lauren V Schnabel; C Wayne McIlwraith; Anthony T Blikslager
Journal:  Equine Vet J       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.