Literature DB >> 22082422

Photoreactivity of the occipital cortex measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging-blood oxygenation level dependent in migraine patients and healthy volunteers: pathophysiological implications.

Helena Martín1, Margarita Sánchez del Río, Carlos López de Silanes, Juan Álvarez-Linera, Juan Antonio Hernández, Juan A Pareja.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The brain of migraineurs is hyperexcitable, particularly the occipital cortex, which is probably hypersensitive to light. Photophobia or hypersensitivity to light may be accounted for by an increased excitability of trigeminal, the visual pathways, and the occipital cortex.
OBJECTIVE: To study light sensitivity and photophobia by assessing the response to light stimuli with functional magnetic resonance imaging-blood oxygenation level dependent (fMRI-BOLD) of the occipital cortex in migraineurs and in controls. Also, to try to decipher the contribution of the occipital cortex to photophobia and whether the cortical reactivity of migraineurs may be part of a constitutional (defensive) mechanism or represents an acquired (sensitization) phenomenon.
METHODS: Nineteen patients with migraine (7 with aura and 12 without aura) and 19 controls were studied with fMRI-BOLD during 4 increasing light intensities. Eight axial image sections of 0.5 cm that covered the occipital cortex were acquired for each intensity. We measured the extension and the intensity of activation for every light stimuli. Photophobia was estimated according to a 0 to 3 semiquantitative scale of light discomfort.
RESULTS: Migraineurs had a significantly higher number of fMRI-activated voxels at low (320.4 for migraineurs [SD = 253.9] and 164.3 for controls [SD = 102.7], P = .027) and medium-low luminance levels (501.2 for migraineurs [SD = 279.5] and 331.1 for controls [SD = 194.3], P = .034) but not at medium-high (579.5 for migraineurs [SD = 201.4] and 510.2 for controls [SD = 239.5], P = .410) and high light stimuli (496.2 for migraineurs [SD = 216.2] and 394.7 for controls [SD = 240], P = .210). No differences were found with respect to the voxel activation intensity (amplitude of the BOLD wave) between migraineurs and controls (8.98 [SD = 2.58] vs 7.99 [SD = 2.57], P = .25; 10.82 [SD = 3.27] vs 9.81 [SD = 3.19], P = .31; 11.90 [SD = 3.18] vs 11.06 [SD = 2.56], P = .62; 11.45 [SD = 2.65] vs 10.25 [SD = 2.22], P = .16). Light discomfort was higher in the group of migraineurs at all the intensities tested, but there was no correlation with the number of activated voxels in the occipital cortex and photophobia. Repetitive light stimuli failed to demonstrate a lack of habituation in migraineurs.
CONCLUSIONS: Migraineurs during interictal periods showed hyperxcitability of the visual cortex with a wider photoresponsive area, the underlying mechanism probably being dual: constitutional-defensive and acquired-sensitizating.
© 2011 American Headache Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22082422     DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2011.02013.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Headache        ISSN: 0017-8748            Impact factor:   5.887


  26 in total

Review 1.  Shedding light on photophobia.

Authors:  Kathleen B Digre; K C Brennan
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Dysregulation of multisensory processing stands out from an early stage of migraine: a study in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Roberta Messina; Maria A Rocca; Bruno Colombo; Paola Valsasina; Alessandro Meani; Andrea Falini; Massimo Filippi
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 3.  Physiopathology of Migraine: What Have We Learned from Functional Imaging?

Authors:  Antonio Russo; Marcello Silvestro; Gioacchino Tedeschi; Alessandro Tessitore
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 4.  Photophobia in primary headaches.

Authors:  Heather L Rossi; Ana Recober
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 5.887

Review 5.  Functional imaging and migraine: new connections?

Authors:  Todd J Schwedt; Catherine D Chong
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.710

6.  Interictal cortical hyperresponsiveness in migraine is directly related to the presence of aura.

Authors:  Ritobrato Datta; Geoffrey K Aguirre; Siyuan Hu; John A Detre; Brett Cucchiara
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 6.292

Review 7.  Closing remarks: what future prospects can we expect in migraine management?

Authors:  R A Purdy
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 8.  Advanced Imaging in the Evaluation of Migraine Headaches.

Authors:  Benjamin M Ellingson; Chelsea Hesterman; Mollie Johnston; Nicholas R Dudeck; Andrew C Charles; Juan Pablo Villablanca
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 9.  Structural and Functional Brain Changes in Migraine.

Authors:  Sait Ashina; Enrico Bentivegna; Paolo Martelletti; Katharina Eikermann-Haerter
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2021-02-16

10.  Synergistic but separable sensory changes in postural tachycardia syndrome and chronic migraine.

Authors:  Melissa M Cortez; Leah Millsap; K C Brennan
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 4.435

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.