BACKGROUND: Better outcome of advanced ovarian cancer after centralized surgery has led to the recommendation for centralized surgery in a Norwegian health region. Whether the practice pattern has changed according to this recommendation has not been examined. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the referral practice and treatment of ovarian cancer in a Norwegian health region after the introduction of centralized surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective, population-based study, including all women undergoing surgery for primary ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancer between 2000 and 2005, in Health Region IV of Norway. Clinical data and data regarding treatment and 5-year follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 279 cases of ovarian, peritoneal, and tubal cancer were included. Eighty-four percent underwent primary surgery at the teaching hospital and 16% at the nonteaching hospitals. After an immediate rise in the number of cases undergoing primary surgery at the teaching hospital after the introduction of centralization in 1995, the percentage distribution between the teaching and nonteaching hospitals was stable during the study period. The women who underwent surgery at the nonteaching hospitals had a higher percentage of early-stage disease and were at higher risk of reoperation for comprehensive staging. CONCLUSIONS: Centralization of ovarian cancer surgery has been successfully accomplished in a health region in Norway. The referral practice of assumed advanced ovarian cancer cases shows satisfactory compliance with centralization at 10 years after the implementation of centralized surgery.
BACKGROUND: Better outcome of advanced ovarian cancer after centralized surgery has led to the recommendation for centralized surgery in a Norwegian health region. Whether the practice pattern has changed according to this recommendation has not been examined. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the referral practice and treatment of ovarian cancer in a Norwegian health region after the introduction of centralized surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective, population-based study, including all women undergoing surgery for primary ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancer between 2000 and 2005, in Health Region IV of Norway. Clinical data and data regarding treatment and 5-year follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 279 cases of ovarian, peritoneal, and tubal cancer were included. Eighty-four percent underwent primary surgery at the teaching hospital and 16% at the nonteaching hospitals. After an immediate rise in the number of cases undergoing primary surgery at the teaching hospital after the introduction of centralization in 1995, the percentage distribution between the teaching and nonteaching hospitals was stable during the study period. The women who underwent surgery at the nonteaching hospitals had a higher percentage of early-stage disease and were at higher risk of reoperation for comprehensive staging. CONCLUSIONS: Centralization of ovarian cancer surgery has been successfully accomplished in a health region in Norway. The referral practice of assumed advanced ovarian cancer cases shows satisfactory compliance with centralization at 10 years after the implementation of centralized surgery.
Authors: Renee A Cowan; Roisin E O'Cearbhaill; Ginger J Gardner; Douglas A Levine; Kara Long Roche; Yukio Sonoda; Oliver Zivanovic; William P Tew; Evis Sala; Yulia Lakhman; Hebert A Vargas Alvarez; Debra M Sarasohn; Svetlana Mironov; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Dennis S Chi Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2015-10-28 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Anna B Beckmeyer-Borowko; Caryn E Peterson; Katherine C Brewer; Mary A Otoo; Faith G Davis; Kent F Hoskins; Charlotte E Joslin Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2016-09-02 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: William A Cliby; Matthew A Powell; Noor Al-Hammadi; Ling Chen; J Philip Miller; Phillip Y Roland; David G Mutch; Robert E Bristow Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2014-10-29 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Richard G Moore; Alexandra Blackman; M Craig Miller; Katina Robison; Paul A DiSilvestro; Elizabeth E Eklund; Robert Strongin; Geralyn Messerlian Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2019-04-13 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Charles H Norell; John Butler; Rhonda Farrell; Alon Altman; James Bentley; Citadel J Cabasag; Paul A Cohen; Scott Fegan; Michael Fung-Kee-Fung; Charlie Gourley; Neville F Hacker; Louise Hanna; Claus Kim Høgdall; Gunnar Kristensen; Janice Kwon; Orla McNally; Gregg Nelson; Andy Nordin; Dearbhaile O'Donnell; Tine Schnack; Peter H Sykes; Ewa Zotow; Samantha Harrison Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2020-08-11 Impact factor: 3.437