Literature DB >> 22080878

Prognostic significance of lymphovascular space invasion and nodal involvement in intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer patients treated with curative intent using surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy.

Kailash Narayan1, Pearly Khaw, David Bernshaw, Linda Mileshkin, Srinivas Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess whether lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) and nodal status provide adequate prognostic information in comparison with the entire set of traditional prognostic factors in intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer patients treated and staged with primary surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy.
METHODS: Three hundred twenty-four previously untreated high-intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer patients with FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage I to IIIC; endometrioid, serous, or clear cell histology; diagnosed between November 1995 and December 2006; who presented to Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre for adjuvant radiotherapy were included in these analyses. All traditionally recognized prognostic factors and newly created 4 pairs of combination of LVSI and nodal status were studied with respect to survival and patterns of failure.
RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 4.8 years. Five-year failure-free survival for all patients according to FIGO stage I, II, and III were 87.4%, 89.0%, and 62.4 %, respectively. In multivariable analysis for relapse, positive LVSI had a hazard ratio of 4.9 (P = 0.000), which increased to 8.8 (P = 0.004) in the presence of positive nodes. For overall survival, only LVSI was significant, with a hazard ratio of 3.02 (P = 0.003). In particular, in the presence of LVSI and nodes, histological type, grade, and myometrial invasion were not significant prognosticators for relapse or overall survival.
CONCLUSIONS: This model enables the separation of good prognosis patients even among poorly differentiated endometrioid, serous, and clear cell carcinoma patients and can be used in simplifying the staging of endometrial cancer and for selecting patients for high-risk endometrial cancer studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22080878     DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e318230c264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  11 in total

1.  Lymphovascular and perineural invasion as selection criteria for adjuvant therapy in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institution analysis.

Authors:  Sarah B Fisher; Sameer H Patel; David A Kooby; Sharon Weber; Mark Bloomston; Clifford Cho; Ioannis Hatzaras; Carl Schmidt; Emily Winslow; Charles A Staley; Shishir K Maithel
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Lymphovascular Space Invasion Portends Poor Prognosis in Low-Risk Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Ricardo dos Reis; Jennifer K Burzawa; Audrey T Tsunoda; Masayoshi Hosaka; Michael Frumovitz; Shannon N Westin; Mark F Munsell; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 3.  Lymphovascular Space Invasion as a Risk Factor in Early Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Azmat H Sadozye; Rosie L Harrand; Nick S Reed
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 4.  Does the mobilization of circulating tumour cells during cancer therapy cause metastasis?

Authors:  Olga A Martin; Robin L Anderson; Kailash Narayan; Michael P MacManus
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Prognostic significance of lymphovascular space invasion in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Ming Chen; Ying Jin; Yalan Bi; Yan Li; Ying Shan; Lingya Pan
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  The survival outcome and patterns of failure in node positive endometrial cancer patients treated with surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy with curative intent.

Authors:  Chrishanthi Rajasooriyar; David Bernshaw; Srinivas Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan; Linda Mileshkin; Kailash Narayan
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 4.401

7.  Risk group criteria for tailoring adjuvant treatment in patients with endometrial cancer: a validation study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group criteria.

Authors:  Tae Wook Kong; Suk Joon Chang; Jiheum Paek; Yonghee Lee; Mison Chun; Hee Sug Ryu
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 4.401

8.  Associations between lymphovascular space invasion, nodal recurrence, and survival in patients with surgical stage I endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ashley E Veade; Jonathan Foote; Jessie Ehrisman; Gloria Broadwater; Brittany A Davidson; Paula S Lee; Angeles Alvarez Secord; Andrew Berchuck; Laura J Havrilesky
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Predictive and prognostic factors in definition of risk groups in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Bengt Sorbe
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11-14

10.  Surgical treatment of endometrial cancer in developing countries: reasons to consider systematic two-step surgical treatment.

Authors:  Cristina Anton; Giovanni Mastrantonio di Fávero; Christhardt Köhler; Filomena Marino Carvalho; Edmund Chada Baracat; Jesus Paula Carvalho
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.