Literature DB >> 22080871

Image-guided robotic surgery: update on research and potential applications in urologic surgery.

S Duke Herrell1, Robert L Galloway, Li-Ming Su.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: New methods of imaging and image-guidance technology have the potential to provide surgeons with spatially accurate three-dimensional information about the location and anatomical relationships of critical subsurface structures and instrument position updated and displayed during the performance of surgery. Robotic platforms and technology in various forms continues to revolutionize surgery and will soon incorporate image guidance. RECENT RESEARCH: Image-guided surgery (IGS) for abdominal and urologic interventions presents complex engineering and surgical challenges along with potential benefits to surgeons and patients. Key concepts such as registration, localization, accuracy, and targeting error are necessary for surgeons to understand and utilize the potential of IGS. Standard robotic surgeries, such as partial nephrectomy and radical prostatectomy may soon incorporate IGS.
SUMMARY: Research continues to explore the potential for combining image guidance and robotics to augment and improve a variety of surgical interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22080871     DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32834d4ce5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  10 in total

1.  Semi-autonomous image-guided brain tumour resection using an integrated robotic system: A bench-top study.

Authors:  Danying Hu; Yuanzheng Gong; Eric J Seibel; Laligam N Sekhar; Blake Hannaford
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 2.547

2.  Initial experience with image-guided surgical navigation in transoral surgery.

Authors:  Joseph A Paydarfar; Xiaotian Wu; Ryan J Halter
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2018-12-16       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 3.  Robotic Surgical System for Radical Prostatectomy: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2017-07-07

4.  Quantifying Anatomic Deformations During Laryngoscopy.

Authors:  Xiaotian Wu; Joseph A Paydarfar; Ryan J Halter
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 5.  Status and Prospects of Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Our Experience and a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Sejin Lee; Taeil Son; Hyoung-Il Kim; Woo Jin Hyung
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 6.  New imaging technologies for robotic kidney cancer surgery.

Authors:  Stefano Puliatti; Ahmed Eissa; Enrico Checcucci; Pietro Piazza; Marco Amato; Stefania Ferretti; Simone Scarcella; Juan Gomez Rivas; Mark Taratkin; Josè Marenco; Ines Belenchon Rivero; Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Giovanni Cacciamani; Ahmed El-Sherbiny; Ahmed Zoeir; Abdelhamid M El-Bahnasy; Ruben De Groote; Alexandre Mottrie; Salvatore Micali
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2022-06-01

7.  Bridging 3D Slicer and ROS2 for Image-Guided Robotic Interventions.

Authors:  Laura Connolly; Anton Deguet; Simon Leonard; Junichi Tokuda; Tamas Ungi; Axel Krieger; Peter Kazanzides; Parvin Mousavi; Gabor Fichtinger; Russell H Taylor
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 3.847

8.  A framework for deformable image registration validation in radiotherapy clinical applications.

Authors:  Raj Varadhan; Grigorios Karangelis; Karthik Krishnan; Susanta Hui
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 9.  Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Current evidence.

Authors:  Rana M Alhossaini; Abdulaziz A Altamran; Won Jun Seo; Woo Jin Hyung
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2017-07-28

Review 10.  The age of robotic surgery - Is laparoscopy dead?

Authors:  Hartwig Schwaibold; Felix Wiesend; Christian Bach
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2018-07-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.