OBJECTIVE: Early assessment of neurologic recovery is often challenging in survivors of cardiac arrest. Further, little is known about when to assess neurologic status in comatose, postarrest patients receiving therapeutic hypothermia. We sought to evaluate timing of prognostication in cardiac arrest survivors who received therapeutic hypothermia. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review of consecutive postarrest patients receiving therapeutic hypothermia (protocol: 24-hr maintenance at target temperature followed by rewarming over 8 hrs). Data were abstracted from the medical chart, including documentation during the first 96 hrs post arrest of "poor" prognosis, diagnostic tests for neuroprognostication, consultations used for determination of prognosis, and outcome at discharge. SETTING: Two academic urban emergency departments. PATIENTS: A total of 55 consecutive patients who underwent therapeutic hypothermia were reviewed between September 2005 and April 2009. INTERVENTION: None. RESULTS: Of our cohort of comatose postarrest patients, 59% (29 of 49) were male, and the mean age was 56 ± 16 yrs. Chart documentation of "poor" or "grave" prognosis occurred "early": during induction, maintenance of cooling, rewarming, or within 15 hrs after normothermia in 57% (28 of 49) of cases. Of patients with early documentation of poor prognosis, 25% (seven of 28) had care withdrawn within 72 hrs post arrest, and 21% (six of 28) survived to discharge with favorable neurologic recovery. In the first 96 hrs post arrest: 88% (43 of 49) of patients received a head computed tomography, 90% (44 of 49) received electroencephalography, 2% (one of 49) received somatosensory evoked potential testing, and 71% (35 of 49) received neurology consultation. CONCLUSIONS: Documentation of "poor prognosis" occurred during therapeutic hypothermia in more than half of patients in our cohort. Premature documentation of poor prognosis may contribute to early decisions to withdraw care. Future guidelines should address when to best prognosticate in postarrest patients receiving therapeutic hypothermia.
OBJECTIVE: Early assessment of neurologic recovery is often challenging in survivors of cardiac arrest. Further, little is known about when to assess neurologic status in comatose, postarrest patients receiving therapeutic hypothermia. We sought to evaluate timing of prognostication in cardiac arrest survivors who received therapeutic hypothermia. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review of consecutive postarrest patients receiving therapeutic hypothermia (protocol: 24-hr maintenance at target temperature followed by rewarming over 8 hrs). Data were abstracted from the medical chart, including documentation during the first 96 hrs post arrest of "poor" prognosis, diagnostic tests for neuroprognostication, consultations used for determination of prognosis, and outcome at discharge. SETTING: Two academic urban emergency departments. PATIENTS: A total of 55 consecutive patients who underwent therapeutic hypothermia were reviewed between September 2005 and April 2009. INTERVENTION: None. RESULTS: Of our cohort of comatose postarrestpatients, 59% (29 of 49) were male, and the mean age was 56 ± 16 yrs. Chart documentation of "poor" or "grave" prognosis occurred "early": during induction, maintenance of cooling, rewarming, or within 15 hrs after normothermia in 57% (28 of 49) of cases. Of patients with early documentation of poor prognosis, 25% (seven of 28) had care withdrawn within 72 hrs post arrest, and 21% (six of 28) survived to discharge with favorable neurologic recovery. In the first 96 hrs post arrest: 88% (43 of 49) of patients received a head computed tomography, 90% (44 of 49) received electroencephalography, 2% (one of 49) received somatosensory evoked potential testing, and 71% (35 of 49) received neurology consultation. CONCLUSIONS: Documentation of "poor prognosis" occurred during therapeutic hypothermia in more than half of patients in our cohort. Premature documentation of poor prognosis may contribute to early decisions to withdraw care. Future guidelines should address when to best prognosticate in postarrest patients receiving therapeutic hypothermia.
Authors: Laurie J Morrison; Charles D Deakin; Peter T Morley; Clifton W Callaway; Richard E Kerber; Steven L Kronick; Eric J Lavonas; Mark S Link; Robert W Neumar; Charles W Otto; Michael Parr; Michael Shuster; Kjetil Sunde; Mary Ann Peberdy; Wanchun Tang; Terry L Vanden Hoek; Bernd W Böttiger; Saul Drajer; Swee Han Lim; Jerry P Nolan Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-10-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Stephen A Bernard; Timothy W Gray; Michael D Buist; Bruce M Jones; William Silvester; Geoff Gutteridge; Karen Smith Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-02-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mary Ann Peberdy; William Kaye; Joseph P Ornato; Gregory L Larkin; Vinay Nadkarni; Mary Elizabeth Mancini; Robert A Berg; Graham Nichol; Tanya Lane-Trultt Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Tamarah Suys; Pierre Bouzat; Pedro Marques-Vidal; Nathalie Sala; Jean-François Payen; Andrea O Rossetti; Mauro Oddo Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Maximilian Mulder; Haley G Gibbs; Stephen W Smith; Ramnik Dhaliwal; Nathaniel L Scott; Mark D Sprenkle; Romergryko G Geocadin Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Patrick J Coppler; Kelly N Sawyer; Chun Song Youn; Seung Pill Choi; Kyu Nam Park; Young-Min Kim; Joshua C Reynolds; David F Gaieski; Byung Kook Lee; Joo Suk Oh; Won Young Kim; Hyung Jun Moon; Benjamin S Abella; Jonathan Elmer; Clifton W Callaway; Jon C Rittenberger Journal: Ther Hypothermia Temp Manag Date: 2016-07-15 Impact factor: 1.286
Authors: Alexis Topjian; Benjamin French; Robert M Sutton; Thomas Conlon; Vinay Nadkarni; Frank W Moler; J Michael Dean; Robert A Berg Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Teresa L May; David B Seder; Gilles L Fraser; Philip Stone; Barbara McCrum; Richard R Riker Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 3.210