| Literature DB >> 22080572 |
Julie M Clarke1, Graeme P Young, David L Topping, Anthony R Bird, Lynne Cobiac, Benjamin L Scherer, Jessica G Winkler, Trevor J Lockett.
Abstract
Animal studies show that increasing large bowel butyrate concentration through ingestion of butyrylated or resistant starches opposes carcinogen-induced tumorigenesis, which is consistent with population data linking greater fiber consumption with lowered colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. Butyrate has been shown to regulate the apoptotic response to DNA damage. This study examined the impact of increasing large bowel butyrate concentration by dietary butyrylated starch on the colonic epithelium of rats treated with the genotoxic carcinogen azoxymethane (AOM). Four groups of 10 male rats were fed AIN-93G based-diets containing either low amylose maize starch (LAMS), LAMS with 3% tributyrin, 10% high amylose maize starch (HAMS) or 10% butyrylated HAMS (HAMSB). HAMS and HAMSB starches were cooked by heating in water. After 4 weeks, rats were injected once with AOM and killed 6 h later. Rates of apoptosis and proliferation were measured in colonic epithelium. Short-chain fatty acid concentrations in large bowel digesta and hepatic portal venous plasma were higher in HAMSB than all other groups. Apoptotic rates in the distal colon were increased by HAMSB and correlated with luminal butyrate concentrations but cellular proliferation rates were unaffected by diet. The increase in apoptosis was most marked in the base and proliferative zone of the crypt. Regulation of luminal butyrate using HAMSB increases the rates of apoptotic deletion of DNA-damaged colonocytes. We propose this pro-apoptotic function of butyrate plays a major role reducing tumour formation in the AOM-treated rat and that these data support a potential protective role of butyrate in CRC.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22080572 PMCID: PMC3276328 DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgr254
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Carcinogenesis ISSN: 0143-3334 Impact factor: 4.944
Final measures of rats fed diets for 28 days containing LAMS, LAMS with 3% tributyrin (LAMST), HAMS and HAMSB
| LAMS | LAMST | HAMS | HAMSB | |
| Body weight(g) | 383 ± 11 | 385 ± 9 | 382 ± 9 | 378 ± 6 |
| Caecal tissue weight (g) | 0.66 ± 0.03a | 0.64 ± 0.03a | 0.78 ± 0.02a | 1.11 ± 0.08b |
| Digesta weight (g) | ||||
| Caecum (g) | 1.24 ± 0.10a | 1.30 ± 0.08a | 1.48 ± 0.16a | 2.43 ± 0.31b |
| Proximal colon (g) | 0.22 ± 0.07 | 0.13 ± 0.04 | 0.39 ± 0.12 | 0.37 ± 0.09 |
| Distal colon (g) | 0.55 ± 0.10 | 0.39 ± 0.06 | 0.48 ± 0.08 | 0.74 ± 0.14 |
| Digesta pH | ||||
| Caecum | 7.19 ± 0.07ac | 7.37 ± 0.07a | 7.00 ± 0.06c | 6.45 ± 0.10b |
| Proximal colon | 7.28 ± 0.08ac | 7.30 ± 0.05a | 6.94 ± 0.09c | 6.57 ± 0.06b |
| Distal colon | 6.93 ± 0.07ac | 7.03 ± 0.06a | 6.74 ± 0.06c | 6.38 ± 0.04b |
Values are mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 9–10). Means with a different superscript within each row are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Fig. 1.Apoptotic index of the colonic epithelium of rats fed LAMS, LAMS with 3% tributyrin (LAMST), HAMS and HAMSB 6 h after AOM injection as determined by (A) morphological assessment of the distal colon, (B) caspase-3 immunohistochemistry of distal colon and (C) morphological assessment of the proximal colon. Data are mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 9–10). Means with a different superscript are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Fig. 2.Crypt cell position of AOM-induced apoptosis measured by morphological assessment of distal colonic epithelium. Data are mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 10). aLAMS significantly different to HAMSB; bLAMST significantly different to HAMSB; cHAMS significantly different to HAMSB (P < 0.05).
Fig. 3.(A) Cell proliferation rates in the distal colon as measured by Ki67 immunohistochemistry 6 h after AOM injection in rats fed diets containing LAMS, LAMS with tributyrin (LAMST), HAMS and HAMSB. Data are mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 10). Means with a different superscript are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Digesta (μmol/g) and hepatic portal (μM) SCFA concentrations of rats fed diets containing LAMS, LAMS with 3% tributyrin (LAMST), HAMS and HAMSB
| LAMS | LAMST | HAMS | HAMSB | |
| Caecum | ||||
| Acetate | 56.0 ± 3.3 | 44.6 ± 5.9 | 51.1 ± 4.4 | 47.3 ± 5.7 |
| Propionate | 16.8 ± 0.9a | 15.5 ± 1.8a | 19.4 ± 2.0a | 28.2 ± 3.1b |
| Butyrate | 14.0 ± 1.3a | 11.0 ± 1.4a | 13.3 ± 1.4a | 32.1 ± 3.7b |
| Total | 91.1 ± 5.1ab | 75.6 ± 9.3a | 88.2 ± 7.3ab | 111.0 ± 11.5b |
| Proximal colon | ||||
| Acetate | 48.2 ± 3.2 | 29.5 ± 4.3 | 41.8 ± 5.0 | 39.3 ± 5.7 |
| Propionate | 12.9 ± 0.7a | 9.1 ± 1.3a | 16.2 ± 2.0ab | 22.3 ± 2.7b |
| Butyrate | 12.5 ± 1.8a | 7.3 ± 2.1a | 11.9 ± 2.1a | 28.4 ± 5.0b |
| Total | 77.2 ± 5.3ab | 48.6 ± 7.7a | 73.8 ± 8.8ab | 93.1 ± 13.0b |
| Distal colon | ||||
| Acetate | 46.6 ± 5.1 | 31.2 ± 4.6 | 43.2 ± 4.0 | 38.1 ± 3 |
| Propionate | 9.8 ± 1.5ab | 8.6 ± 1.5b | 15.4 ± 1.8a | 24.1 ± 2.0c |
| Butyrate | 12.4 ± 2.2a | 9.3 ± 2.1a | 12.0 ± 2.2a | 29.8 ± 3.0b |
| Total | 71.6 ± 8.8a | 2.2 ± 8.4a | 74.6 ± 7.2ab | 95.4 ± 8.0b |
| Hepatic portal venous plasma | ||||
| Acetate | 631 ± 60 | 466 ± 49 | 558 ± 39 | 681 ± 75 |
| Propionate | 123 ± 33a | 59 ± 8a | 107 ± 10a | 251 ± 38b |
| Butyrate | 50 ± 9a | 102 ± 27ab | 51 ± 8a | 201 ± 47b |
Values are mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 9–10, except proximal colon n = 6–8). Means with a different superscript within each row are significantly different (P < 0.05).