Literature DB >> 22079919

Efficacy and safety of procedural sedation and analgesia for burn wound care.

Elaine M Thompson1, David D Andrews, Cheryl Christ-Libertin.   

Abstract

The study aim was to quantify efficacy and patient safety of registered nurse-administered procedural sedation and analgesia in a regional burn center. The investigators conducted a review of procedural sedation forms for all pediatric and adult patients admitted to this burn center from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2005, for demographic and clinical data including patient age, gender, body weight, TBSA, dates of burn injury and wound care procedures, length of procedure, pre- and postprocedural pain assessment, procedural sedation/analgesia medications and doses, adverse drug events, and related interventions. During the 12-month study period, a total of 328 burn patients received 1293 procedural sedation procedures; child subjects (≤ 18 years) received 356 procedures and adult subjects (19-87 years) received 937 procedures. The mean (SD) length of the procedure was 60.1 (22.49) minutes with a range of 10 to 170 minutes. The mean subject age was 34.2 years (range: 6 weeks to 87 years), 67% were male, and the mean TBSA was 17% (0.5-68%). Ninety-four percent received fentanyl for analgesia and 85% received midazolam for anxiolysis and amnesia. The mean preprocedural pain score was 3.2 and the mean postprocedural pain score was 2 (t = 14.795; df = 1243; P < .001). Ten adverse events, all respiratory related, were documented in eight patients, two of whom experienced a second adverse event for an overall adverse event rate of 0.77%. No patient required intubation. Procedural sedation administered by a registered nurse competent in administration and monitoring in a burn center provided safe and effective pain management during wound care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22079919     DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e318236fe4f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Res        ISSN: 1559-047X            Impact factor:   1.845


  6 in total

Review 1.  Physical rehabilitation of pediatric burns.

Authors:  B Atiyeh; H H Janom
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2014-03-31

2.  Procedural Sedation Practice: A Review of Current Nursing Standards.

Authors:  Nancy Crego
Journal:  J Nurs Regul       Date:  2015-07-22

3.  EMLA anaesthetic cream for debridement of burns: a study of plasma concentrations of lidocaine and prilocaine and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Stefan Lillieborg; Leif Aanderud
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2017-10-25

4.  Projector-based virtual reality dome environment for procedural pain and anxiety in young children with burn injuries: a pilot study.

Authors:  Christelle Khadra; Ariane Ballard; Johanne Déry; David Paquin; Jean-Simon Fortin; Isabelle Perreault; David R Labbe; Hunter G Hoffman; Stéphane Bouchard; Sylvie LeMay
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.133

5.  Early non-excisional debridement of paediatric burns under general anaesthesia reduces time to re-epithelialisation and risk of skin graft.

Authors:  Bronwyn Griffin; Anjana Bairagi; Lee Jones; Zoe Dettrick; Maleea Holbert; Roy Kimble
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Considerations for pediatric burn sedation and analgesia.

Authors:  Alice Fagin; Tina L Palmieri
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2017-10-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.