Literature DB >> 22079678

Predictors of resolution of complex atypical hyperplasia or grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma in premenopausal women treated with progestin therapy.

Kristine R Penner1, Oliver Dorigo, Chisa Aoyama, Nora Ostrzega, Bonnie L Balzer, Jianyu Rao, Christine S Walsh, Ilana Cass, Christine H Holschneider.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify clinical and pathologic predictors of response to progestin treatment in premenopausal women with complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH) and Grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma (Grade 1 EA).
METHODS: Forty premenopausal patients with Grade 1 EA or CAH who underwent progestin therapy for a minimum of 8 weeks were retrospectively identified. Patient characteristics and histopathologic features of pretreatment and first follow-up endometrial specimens were evaluated as predictors of resolution, defined as absence of hyperplasia or carcinoma.
RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated 63% resolution at 18 months of follow-up. Multivariate classification analysis showed that resolution rates were higher in individuals with a low pre-treatment qualitative abnormal architecture score and a BMI <35 (Standardized Resolution Ratio (SRR)=1.48, p=0.03). The diagnosis of benign endometrium or simple hyperplasia on the first follow-up specimen was highly predictive of resolution (SRR=2.25, p=0.002). Resolution rates were lower among subjects with a high pre-treatment qualitative abnormal architecture score (SRR=0.37, p<0.03) and lowest in subjects whose first follow-up specimen showed persistent complexity, atypia, or carcinoma with adjacent stromal decidualization (SRR=0.24, p=0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and pathologic parameters can predict response to progestin therapy in premenopausal women with CAH and Grade 1 EA. A low likelihood of resolution is predicted by an unfavorable pre-treatment architectural score and lack of pathological response in the first specimen, despite adjacent stromal decidualization.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22079678     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  10 in total

1.  Endoplasmic reticulum stress in complex atypical hyperplasia as a possible predictor of occult carcinoma and progestin response.

Authors:  Katherine E Tierney; Lingyun Ji; Shannon S Dralla; Eunjeong Yoo; Annie Yessaian; Huyen Q Pham; Lynda Roman; Richard Sposto; Paulette Mhawech-Fauceglia; Yvonne G Lin
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  MPA alters metabolic phenotype of endometrial cancer-associated fibroblasts from obese women via IRS2 signaling.

Authors:  Intan Sofia Omar; Amira Hajirah Abd Jamil; Noor Azmi Mat Adenan; Ivy Chung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  A Prospective Cohort Study of Metformin as an Adjuvant Therapy for Infertile Women With Endometrial Complex Hyperplasia/Complex Atypical Hyperplasia and Their Subsequent Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes.

Authors:  Wei-Ya Kong; Zheng-Ai Liu; Na Zhang; Xue Wu; Xing-Bo Zhao; Lei Yan
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 6.055

Review 4.  Preserving fertility in young patients with endometrial cancer: current perspectives.

Authors:  Eleftheria Kalogera; Sean C Dowdy; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-07-29

5.  Conservative treatment for atypical endometrial hyperplasia: what is the most effective therapeutic method?

Authors:  Mi Kyoung Kim; Seok Ju Seong
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  Conservative therapy with metformin plus megestrol acetate for endometrial atypical hyperplasia.

Authors:  Weiwei Shan; Chao Wang; Zhenbo Zhang; Chao Gu; Chengcheng Ning; Xuezhen Luo; Qiongjie Zhou; Xiaojun Chen
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 4.401

7.  Fertility-preserving treatment in complex atypical hyperplasia and early endometrial cancer in young women with oral progestin: Is it effective?

Authors:  Ji Sun Baek; Wan Ho Lee; Woo Dae Kang; Seok Mo Kim
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2016-01-15

Review 8.  Comparison among fertility-sparing therapies for well differentiated early-stage endometrial carcinoma and complex atypical hyperplasia.

Authors:  Qing Zhang; Gonghua Qi; Margaux J Kanis; Ruifen Dong; Baoxia Cui; Xingsheng Yang; Beihua Kong
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-03

9.  Assessing Post-Treatment Pathologic Tumor Response in Female Genital Tract Carcinomas: An Update.

Authors:  Frediano Inzani; Damiano Arciuolo; Giuseppe Angelico; Angela Santoro; Antonio Travaglino; Nicoletta D'Alessandris; Giulia Scaglione; Michele Valente; Federica Cianfrini; Antonio Raffone; Gian Franco Zannoni
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Fertility-Sparing Treatment for Endometrial Cancer or Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia Patients With Obesity.

Authors:  Junyu Chen; Dongyan Cao; Jiaxin Yang; Mei Yu; Huimei Zhou; Ninghai Cheng; Jinhui Wang; Ying Zhang; Peng Peng; Keng Shen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 6.244

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.