Literature DB >> 22079648

Early detection and treatment of severe sepsis in the emergency department: identifying barriers to implementation of a protocol-based approach.

Mara Burney1, Joseph Underwood, Shayna McEvoy, Germaine Nelson, Amy Dzierba, Vepuka Kauari, David Chong.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Despite evidence to support efficacy of early goal-directed therapy for resuscitation of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department, implementation remains incomplete. To identify and address specific barriers at our institution and maximize benefits of a planned sepsis treatment initiative, a baseline assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding detection and treatment of severe sepsis was performed.
METHODS: An online survey was offered to nurses and physicians in the emergency department of a major urban academic medical center. The questionnaire was designed to assess (1) baseline knowledge and self-reported confidence in identification of systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis; (2) current practices in treatment; (3) difficulties encountered in managing sepsis cases; (4) perceived barriers to implementation of a clinical pathway based on early quantitative resuscitation goals; and (5) to elicit suggestions for improvement of sepsis treatment within the department.
RESULTS: Respondents (n = 101) identified barriers to a quantitative resuscitation protocol for sepsis. These barriers included the inability to perform central venous pressure/central venous oxygen saturation monitoring, limited physical space in the emergency department, and lack of sufficient nursing staff. Among nurses, the greatest perceived contributor to delays in treatment was a delay in diagnosis by physicians; among physicians, a delay in availability of ICU beds and nursing delays were the greatest barriers. Despite these issues, respondents indicated that a written protocol would be helpful to them. DISCUSSION: Knowledge gaps and procedural hurdles identified by the survey will inform both educational and process components of an initiative to improve sepsis care in the emergency department.
Copyright © 2012 Emergency Nurses Association. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22079648     DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2011.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Nurs        ISSN: 0099-1767            Impact factor:   1.836


  7 in total

1.  Barriers to referral for elevated blood pressure in the emergency department and differences between provider type.

Authors:  Kimberly Souffront; Deborah Chyun; Christine Kovner
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.738

2.  Knowledge about systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis: a survey among Dutch emergency department nurses.

Authors:  L C van den Hengel; T Visseren; P E Meima-Cramer; P P M Rood; S C E Schuit
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-07-15

3.  Sepsis assessment and management in critically Ill adults: A systematic review.

Authors:  Mohammad Rababa; Dania Bani Hamad; Audai A Hayajneh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Visualization of three-dimensional microcirculation of rodents' retina and choroid for studies of critical illness using optical coherence tomography angiography.

Authors:  Jang Ryul Park; ByungKun Lee; Min Ji Lee; Kyuseok Kim; Wang-Yuhl Oh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Predictors of unattempted central venous catheterization in septic patients eligible for early goal-directed therapy.

Authors:  David R Vinson; Dustin W Ballard; Matthew D Stevenson; Dustin G Mark; Mary E Reed; Adina S Rauchwerger; Uli K Chettipally; Steven R Offerman
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-02

6.  Early identification of sepsis in hospital inpatients by ward nurses increases 30-day survival.

Authors:  Malvin Torsvik; Lise Tuset Gustad; Arne Mehl; Inger Lise Bangstad; Liv Jorun Vinje; Jan Kristian Damås; Erik Solligård
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 7.  Clinicians' experience of providing care: a rapid review.

Authors:  Maha Pervaz Iqbal; Elizabeth Manias; Laurel Mimmo; Stephen Mears; Briony Jack; Liz Hay; Reema Harrison
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.