Literature DB >> 22078258

INbreast: toward a full-field digital mammographic database.

Inês C Moreira1, Igor Amaral, Inês Domingues, António Cardoso, Maria João Cardoso, Jaime S Cardoso.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: Computer-aided detection and diagnosis (CAD) systems have been developed in the past two decades to assist radiologists in the detection and diagnosis of lesions seen on breast imaging exams, thus providing a second opinion. Mammographic databases play an important role in the development of algorithms aiming at the detection and diagnosis of mammary lesions. However, available databases often do not take into consideration all the requirements needed for research and study purposes. This article aims to present and detail a new mammographic database.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Images were acquired at a breast center located in a university hospital (Centro Hospitalar de S. João [CHSJ], Breast Centre, Porto) with the permission of the Portuguese National Committee of Data Protection and Hospital's Ethics Committee. MammoNovation Siemens full-field digital mammography, with a solid-state detector of amorphous selenium was used.
RESULTS: The new database-INbreast-has a total of 115 cases (410 images) from which 90 cases are from women with both breasts affected (four images per case) and 25 cases are from mastectomy patients (two images per case). Several types of lesions (masses, calcifications, asymmetries, and distortions) were included. Accurate contours made by specialists are also provided in XML format.
CONCLUSION: The strengths of the actually presented database-INbreast-relies on the fact that it was built with full-field digital mammograms (in opposition to digitized mammograms), it presents a wide variability of cases, and is made publicly available together with precise annotations. We believe that this database can be a reference for future works centered or related to breast cancer imaging.
Copyright © 2012 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22078258     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  54 in total

1.  Can Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Increase or Predict the Success Rate of Testicular Sperm Aspiration in Patients With Azoospermia?

Authors:  Heng Xue; Shou-Yang Wang; Li-Gang Cui; Kai Hong
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Automatic breast mass detection in mammograms using density of wavelet coefficients and a patch-based CNN.

Authors:  Behrouz NiroomandFam; Alireza Nikravanshalmani; Madjid Khalilian
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Integrative blockwise sparse analysis for tissue characterization and classification.

Authors:  Keni Zheng; Chelsea E Harris; Rachid Jennane; Sokratis Makrogiannis
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 5.326

4.  Automatic Pectoral Muscle Region Segmentation in Mammograms Using Genetic Algorithm and Morphological Selection.

Authors:  Rongbo Shen; Kezhou Yan; Fen Xiao; Jia Chang; Cheng Jiang; Ke Zhou
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 5.  CAD and AI for breast cancer-recent development and challenges.

Authors:  Heang-Ping Chan; Ravi K Samala; Lubomir M Hadjiiski
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Automatic mass detection in mammograms using deep convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Richa Agarwal; Oliver Diaz; Xavier Lladó; Moi Hoon Yap; Robert Martí
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-02-20

7.  Classification of Mammographic ROI for Microcalcification Detection Using Multifractal Approach.

Authors:  Nadia Kermouni Serradj; Mahammed Messadi; Sihem Lazzouni
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.903

8.  An evaluation of image descriptors combined with clinical data for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Daniel C Moura; Miguel A Guevara López
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  Spatially localized sparse representations for breast lesion characterization.

Authors:  Keni Zheng; Chelsea Harris; Predrag Bakic; Sokratis Makrogiannis
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 4.589

Review 10.  Adoption of artificial intelligence in breast imaging: evaluation, ethical constraints and limitations.

Authors:  Sarah E Hickman; Gabrielle C Baxter; Fiona J Gilbert
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.