Literature DB >> 22078183

Choice of birth control methods among European women and the role of partners and providers.

Jokin de Irala1, Alfonso Osorio, Silvia Carlos, Cristina Lopez-del Burgo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The choice of a birth control method is influenced by sociocultural and personal factors. We explored the perceived influences in women's choice of a birth control method in five European countries (Germany, France, the UK, Romania and Sweden), where contraception is widely used. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional study of 1137 randomly selected women aged 18-49 years. An anonymous, 31-item questionnaire related to birth control methods was used. Logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with partner participation in choice of a contraceptive.
RESULTS: Oral contraceptives were mainly used in Germany (54.3%), France (50.5%) and Sweden (34.6%) and condoms in the UK (29.6%) and Romania (22.9%). Sweden showed the highest use of intrauterine devices (IUD, 19%). Romania had the lowest use of contraception. Oral contraceptives and IUDs use were frequently suggested by providers instead of by women. Choosing the method with the partner was associated with age [odds ratio (OR)=0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94-0.99], being a university graduate (OR=1.59, 95% CI 1.01-2.29), married (OR=1.52, 95% CI 1.01-2.29) and with using a method that requires partner's cooperation (OR=8.18, 95% CI 5.46-12.27).
CONCLUSIONS: Hormonal contraceptives and IUDs are commonly recommended by providers rather than requested by women. Partner preferences are taken into account when his cooperation in the use of the method is needed. As fertility care is a male and female issue, there is still more room for actively involving both women and men in their choice of a birth control method.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22078183     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  13 in total

Review 1.  Provider and lay perspectives on intra-uterine contraception: a global review.

Authors:  Marina A S Daniele; John Cleland; Lenka Benova; Moazzam Ali
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 3.223

2.  Reasons for hormonal contraceptive use in a cohort of African-American women living in the Detroit area.

Authors:  Sarah R Hoffman; Wanda K Nicholson; Jennifer S Smith; Michele Jonsson Funk; Michael G Hudgens; Charles Poole; Donna D Baird; Quaker E Harmon
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Opinions and Attitudes About Vasectomy of Married Couples Living in Turkey.

Authors:  Sezer Kısa; Esen Savaş; Simge Zeyneloğlu; Sevgül Dönmez
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2015-12-03

4.  Knowledge and factors determining choice of contraception among Singaporean women.

Authors:  Arundhati Gosavi; Yueyun Ma; Hungchew Wong; Kuldip Singh
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 1.858

5.  Contraceptive practices adopted by women attending an urban health centre.

Authors:  S S Prateek; R S Saurabh
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.927

6.  Determinants of vitamin D status in young adults: influence of lifestyle, sociodemographic and anthropometric factors.

Authors:  Rune Tønnesen; Peter Hambak Hovind; Lars Thorbjørn Jensen; Peter Schwarz
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of a low-dose contraceptive levonorgestrel intrauterine system in Sweden.

Authors:  Nathaniel Henry; Charlie Hawes; Julia Lowin; Ingrid Lekander; Anna Filonenko; Helena K Kallner
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  Observational, prospective, multicentre study to evaluate the effects of counselling on the choice of combined hormonal contraceptives in Italy--the ECOS (Educational COunselling effectS) study.

Authors:  Alessandro Gambera; Fedela Corda; Rosetta Papa; Carlo Bastianelli; Sandra Bucciantini; Salvatore Dessole; Pasquale Scagliola; Nadia Bernardini; Daniela de Feo; Fabiola Beligotti
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.809

9.  Contextual determinants of induced abortion: a panel analysis.

Authors:  Mar Llorente-Marrón; Montserrat Díaz-Fernández; Paz Méndez-Rodríguez
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.106

10.  Impact of pay for performance on prescribing of long-acting reversible contraception in primary care: an interrupted time series study.

Authors:  Myat E Arrowsmith; Azeem Majeed; John Tayu Lee; Sonia Saxena
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.