Literature DB >> 22077974

Accuracy of two-dimensional echocardiography in determining aortic valve structure in patients >50 years of age having aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.

Ramy Fouad Ayad1, Paul Arthur Grayburn, Jong Mi Ko, Giovanni Filardo, William Clifford Roberts.   

Abstract

We sought to measure the accuracy of 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography in determining aortic valve structure in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR). Few studies have compared aortic valve structure determined by echocardiogram to that determined by examination of the operatively excised stenotic aortic valve. Two-dimensional echocardiograms were reviewed and interpreted by an expert echocardiographer in blinded fashion in 100 patients >50 years of age (mean 70) who had undergone AVR for isolated AS ± aortic regurgitation and the aortic valve structure (unicuspid, bicuspid, tricuspid) was compared to that from examination of the operatively excised stenotic valve. After excluding 14 cases in which echocardiograms were uninterpretable because of heavy calcium and/or poor image quality, congenitally malformed valves were present in 44 patients (51%) and tricuspid valves in 42 of the 86 patients (49%). Ten of the 14 patients (71%) with uninterpretable echocardiograms had congenitally malformed valves. Valve structure by echocardiogram was concordant with morphologic interpretation in 57 of 86 patients (66% accuracy, kappa = 0.33). Accuracy trended toward improvement as degree of AS decreased. In patients with valve areas similar to those enrolled in the recent transcatheter aortic valve implantation trial (PARTNER; 0.7 ± 0.2 cm(2)), aortic valve structure was accurately determined by echocardiography in 21 of 35 patients (60%). In conclusion, aortic valve structure was interpretable by transthoracic echocardiogram in 86 of 100 patients and accurate in 57 of these 86 patients (66%).
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22077974     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

Review 1.  Current management of calcific aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Brian R Lindman; Robert O Bonow; Catherine M Otto
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 17.367

2.  Circulating soluble receptor for advanced glycation end product identifies patients with bicuspid aortic valve and associated aortopathies.

Authors:  Emanuela Branchetti; Joseph E Bavaria; Juan B Grau; Richard E Shaw; Paolo Poggio; Eric K Lai; Nimesh D Desai; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman; Giovanni Ferrari
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 8.311

3.  Additive Value of CT to Age, Aortic Diameter, and Echocardiography in Diagnosis and Classification of Bicuspid Aortic Valve in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Hidenobu Takagi; Michiko Yoshizawa; Makoto Orii; Akiko Kumagai; Atsushi Tashiro; Takuya Chiba; Hajime Kin; Ryoichi Tanaka; Kunihiro Yoshioka
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2021-02-04

4.  Bicuspid aortic valve disease: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Ify Mordi; Nikolaos Tzemos
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 1.866

5.  Reducing Morbidity and Mortality in Patients With Coarctation Requires Systematic Differentiation of Impacts of Mixed Valvular Disease on Coarctation Hemodynamics.

Authors:  Reza Sadeghi; Benjamin Tomka; Seyedvahid Khodaei; Julio Garcia; Javier Ganame; Zahra Keshavarz-Motamed
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 6.106

Review 6.  Imaging of cardiovascular risk in patients with Turner's syndrome.

Authors:  A Marin; J R Weir-McCall; D J Webb; E J R van Beek; S Mirsadraee
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 2.350

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.