OBJECTIVE: A practical methodological issue for diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) researchers is determining what to do about incidental findings, such as white matter hyperintensities (WMHI). The purpose of this study was to compare healthy control subjects with or without WMHIs on whole brain DTI. METHOD: Participants were 30 subjects (age = 37.7, SD = 11.3, Range = 18-60; 70% female) who had no known developmental, general medical, neurological or psychiatric condition that could have had an adverse affect on brain morphology. RESULTS: MRI (3 Tesla) revealed, at minimum, a WMHI in eight subjects (26.7%). Fractional anisotropy (FA) was calculated for 19 regions of interest (ROI). Frequency distributions of FA scores for the 19 ROIs were calculated. The 10th percentile for each ROI was selected as a cut-off score. Having four or more low FA scores occurred in 16.7%. More subjects with incidental findings met criterion for low FA scores (37.5%), compared to 9.1% of subjects with no findings. When subjects with minor WMHIs were retained and only those with multiple incidental findings were excluded, 8.3% of the retained subjects met criterion for low FA scores compared to 50.0% of the excluded subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The decision to include or exclude subjects who have incidental findings can influence the results of a study.
OBJECTIVE: A practical methodological issue for diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) researchers is determining what to do about incidental findings, such as white matter hyperintensities (WMHI). The purpose of this study was to compare healthy control subjects with or without WMHIs on whole brain DTI. METHOD:Participants were 30 subjects (age = 37.7, SD = 11.3, Range = 18-60; 70% female) who had no known developmental, general medical, neurological or psychiatric condition that could have had an adverse affect on brain morphology. RESULTS: MRI (3 Tesla) revealed, at minimum, a WMHI in eight subjects (26.7%). Fractional anisotropy (FA) was calculated for 19 regions of interest (ROI). Frequency distributions of FA scores for the 19 ROIs were calculated. The 10th percentile for each ROI was selected as a cut-off score. Having four or more low FA scores occurred in 16.7%. More subjects with incidental findings met criterion for low FA scores (37.5%), compared to 9.1% of subjects with no findings. When subjects with minor WMHIs were retained and only those with multiple incidental findings were excluded, 8.3% of the retained subjects met criterion for low FA scores compared to 50.0% of the excluded subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The decision to include or exclude subjects who have incidental findings can influence the results of a study.
Authors: A A Willette; C L Coe; A C Birdsill; B B Bendlin; R J Colman; A L Alexander; D B Allison; R H Weindruch; S C Johnson Journal: Age (Dordr) Date: 2013-03-06
Authors: Ullamari Hakulinen; Antti Brander; Pertti Ryymin; Juha Öhman; Seppo Soimakallio; Mika Helminen; Prasun Dastidar; Hannu Eskola Journal: BMC Med Imaging Date: 2012-10-11 Impact factor: 1.930
Authors: Sri C Kanchibhotla; Karen A Mather; Anbupalam Thalamuthu; Lin Zhuang; Peter R Schofield; John B J Kwok; David Ames; Margaret J Wright; Julian N Trollor; Wei Wen; Perminder S Sachdev Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-12-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sudheer Giddaluru; Thomas Espeseth; Alireza Salami; Lars T Westlye; Anders Lundquist; Andrea Christoforou; Sven Cichon; Rolf Adolfsson; Vidar M Steen; Ivar Reinvang; Lars Göran Nilsson; Stéphanie Le Hellard; Lars Nyberg Journal: Brain Struct Funct Date: 2016-02-06 Impact factor: 3.270
Authors: Emma A Webb; Lucy Elliott; Dominic Carlin; Martin Wilson; Kirsty Hall; Jennifer Netherton; Julie Reed; Tim G Barrett; Vijay Salwani; Jon D Clayden; Wiebke Arlt; Nils Krone; Andrew C Peet; Amanda G Wood Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2018-04-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Daniel Svärd; Markus Nilsson; Björn Lampinen; Jimmy Lätt; Pia C Sundgren; Erik Stomrud; Lennart Minthon; Oskar Hansson; Danielle van Westen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: William J Panenka; Rael T Lange; Sylvain Bouix; Jason R Shewchuk; Manraj K S Heran; Jeffrey R Brubacher; Ryan Eckbo; Martha E Shenton; Grant L Iverson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 3.240