Literature DB >> 22077472

Cervical decompression and reconstruction without intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.

Vincent C Traynelis1, Kingsley O Abode-Iyamah, Katie M Leick, Sarah M Bender, Jeremy D W Greenlee.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The primary goal of this study was to review the immediate postoperative neurological function in patients surgically treated for symptomatic cervical spine disease without intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. The secondary goal was to assess the economic impact of intraoperative monitoring (IOM) in this patient population.
METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of 720 consecutively treated patients who underwent cervical spine procedures. The patients were identified and the data were collected by individuals who were not involved in their care.
RESULTS: A total of 1534 cervical spine levels were treated in 720 patients using anterior, posterior, and combined (360°) approaches. Myelopathy was present preoperatively in 308 patients. There were 185 patients with increased signal intensity within the spinal cord on preoperative T2-weighted MR images, of whom 43 patients had no clinical evidence of myelopathy. Three patients (0.4%) exhibited a new neurological deficit postoperatively. Of these patients, 1 had a preoperative diagnosis of radiculopathy, while the other 2 were treated for myelopathy. The new postoperative deficits completely resolved in all 3 patients and did not require additional treatment. The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for IOM during cervical decompression include 95925 and 95926 for somatosensory evoked potential monitoring of the upper and lower extremities, respectively, as well as 95928 and 95929 for motor evoked potential monitoring of the upper and lower extremities. In addition to the charge for the baseline [monitoring] study, patients are charged hourly for ongoing electrophysiology testing and monitoring using the CPT code 95920. Based on these codes and assuming an average of 4 hours of monitoring time per surgical case, the savings realized in this group of patients was estimated to be $1,024,754.
CONCLUSIONS: With the continuing increase in health care costs, it is our responsibility as providers to minimize expenses when possible. This should be accomplished without compromising the quality of care to patients. This study demonstrates that decompression and reconstruction for symptomatic cervical spine disease without IOM may reduce the cost of treatment without adversely impacting patient safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22077472     DOI: 10.3171/2011.10.SPINE11199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  19 in total

1.  Indication and technical implementation of the intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgeries-a transnational survey in the German-speaking countries.

Authors:  Sebastian Siller; Constance Raith; Stefan Zausinger; Joerg-Christian Tonn; Andrea Szelenyi
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 2.  Commentary : The value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring: evidence, equipoise and outcomes.

Authors:  R N Holdefer; S A Skinner
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Comparison of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring outcomes between cervical and thoracic spine surgery.

Authors:  Shujie Wang; Yuan Tian; Xiangquan Lin; Zhifu Ren; Yu Zhao; Jiliang Zhai; Xiaojuan Zhang; Yanwei Zhao; Yingyue Dong; Congran Zhao; Ye Tian
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  [Intraoperative neuromonitoring in cervical deformity surgery].

Authors:  E Shiban; B Meyer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Spinal intradural extramedullary tumors: the value of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring on surgical outcome.

Authors:  Ran Harel; David Schleifer; Shmuel Appel; Moshe Attia; Zvi R Cohen; Nachshon Knoller
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Intraoperative Spinal Cord Monitoring Does Not Decrease New Postoperative Neurological Deficits in Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy or Spondylotic Myelopathy Undergoing One or Two Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy And Fusion.

Authors:  Brandon G Wilkinson; Justin T Chang; Natalie A Glass; Cassim M Igram
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2021

7.  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A two decade experience.

Authors:  Robert F Heary; Anna MacDowall; Nitin Agarwal
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 8.  Intraoperative Neuromonitoring for Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: What Is the Evidence?

Authors:  Remi M Ajiboye; Stephen D Zoller; Akshay Sharma; Gina M Mosich; Austin Drysch; Jesse Li; Tara Reza; Sina Pourtaheri
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.241

9.  Motor evoked potentials in 43 high risk spine deformities.

Authors:  Mirza Biscevic; Sejla Biscevic; Farid Ljuca; Barbara Ur Smrke; Cagatay Ozturk; Merita Tiric-Campara
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2014-10-15

10.  Routine Use of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring During ACDFs for the Treatment of Spondylotic Myelopathy and Radiculopathy Is Questionable: A Review of 15,395 Cases.

Authors:  Remi M Ajiboye; Anthony D'Oro; Adedayo O Ashana; Rafael A Buerba; Elizabeth L Lord; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang; Sina Pourtaheri
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.